Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 11:33 AM Sep 2013

Is anyone sad to see Larry Summers withdraw his name for Fed chairman?

Given his advocacy for bank deregulation not just for the US but every other country in the world during the Clinton years, and his strong arming of Brooksley Born, an financial regulator who was actually trying to enforce the fews laws and regs that remained, it is hard to think of someone worse for the job.

Larry Summers was a slug in the garden of our battered democracy, and I for one am glad that he salted himself and melt his own political career.

But I'm curious what the defense is that could possibly have been given for him in the corridors of power, other than that he did exactly what Wall Street bankers told him to do.

Can someone make the case that bank deregulation was GOOD for the US and the world?

Or that intimidating a regulator from doing their jobs was somehow GOOD for America and the world?

Are you sad to see Jabba the Summers go?


16 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
NO--thanks Larry for lancing the corrupt boil that you are on the body politic
16 (100%)
YES--Larry made key contributions in the Clinton years and during the Obama admin
0 (0%)
OTHER
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
3. I don't think this is a fair poll.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 11:39 AM
Sep 2013

Trying to associate scum like Summers with a lovable character like Jabba--

Oh, wait, that's Rush.

Nevermind.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
7. I should have added, "no offense meant to slugs, boils, or Jabba"
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:08 PM
Sep 2013

A standard disclaimer I used to use for Bush insults like nitwit (no offense nits).

elleng

(130,834 posts)
4. A friend told me he'd read comments to NYTimes story about this yesterday,
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 11:42 AM
Sep 2013

and there wasn't ONE pro-Summers! So at least this is ONE good decision he made!

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
9. Dick Cheney might be more popular--I would really like to know what the hell Obama was saying in his
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:08 PM
Sep 2013

defense

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. IF the president really was going to nominate Summers he owes the people
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:10 PM
Sep 2013

who torpedoed this nomination a huge debt.

It was/would have been a stupid f@cking nomination from the beginning. Anyone outside his bubble would know that.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
13. where are our DLC friends? did they sleep in? take the day off for Joe Lieberman's birthday?
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 12:44 PM
Sep 2013

can say show up and boat and put some minimal defense up for this guy?

you know we're on the winning side of an issue when they don't even
try

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
14. Somebody, Somewhere, at Some time must have liked Larry Summers ...a lot.
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 02:06 PM
Sep 2013

[font size=5]
The DLC New Team
[/font]

(Screen Capped from the DLC Website)

Birds of a Feather.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
19. The Republicans made him choose those people!
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 12:07 PM
Sep 2013

Plus, that was ALL a part of the Secret Plan to get Putin to step in and stop the US from bombing Syria.
SEE?
We ALL got "played".

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
17. You bet I am pissed off about it for the same reason I'm pissed that we are not bombing Syria
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 02:12 AM
Sep 2013

I wanted so much to have something more to bash Obama for

pampango

(24,692 posts)
18. My only reservation - CNBC: "If it's Yellen, Wall Street gets the Fed chief it wanted, not expected"
Tue Sep 17, 2013, 06:30 AM
Sep 2013

Wall Street looks set to get who it wants as Federal Reserve chairman, but definitely not who it expected.

The CNBC September Fed Survey, conducted Thursday and Friday, found Wall Street participants by a 2-to-1 margin believed President Barack Obama would nominate former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers to be the next Fed Chairman. But by about a 5-to-1 margin, they wanted current Vice Chairwoman Janet Yellen to accede to the top post over Summers.

Among the reasons for the preference of Yellen over Summers: The survey of 47 top economists, Wall Street strategists and investment managers found that most perceived Summers to be more hawkish than Yellen—that is, they believed he would be less likely to continue the current easy monetary policy of current Chairman Ben Bernanke.

The survey found that participants believed Yellen was substantially more concerned about unemployment than Summers, and that Summers had greater concern about inflation. ... Market participants gave Bernanke the highest overall score. Yellen came in a close second. But even Kohn beat Summers, who finished last among the four in the eyes of Wall Street.

http://t.nbcnews.com/business/if-its-yellen-wall-street-gets-fed-chief-it-wanted-8C11166978

It is interesting that stock markets all over the world were up today. They did not seem sorry to see Summers bite the dust.

Krugman posted his support for Yellen. It is always a weird day when "Wall Street participants" agree with Krugman and a largest portion of DU, including me, who prefer Yellen over Summers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is anyone sad to see Larr...