General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn the Subject of Diapers, How about Diaperless Child-Rearing?
Check this out:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/nyregion/babys-latest-going-diaperless-at-home-or-even-in-the-park.html
When Jada Shapiro decided to raise her daughter from birth without diapers, for the most part, not everyone was amused. Ms. Shapiro scattered little bowls around the house to catch her daughters offerings, and her sister insisted that she use a big, dark marker to mark the bowls so that they could never find their way back to the kitchen.
But elimination communication, as the diaper-free method of child-rearing is called, is finding an audience in the hipper precincts of New York City.
Ms. Shapiro, who is a doula, a birth and child-rearing coach, says it is practically now a job qualification to at least be able to offer diaper-free training as an option to clients. Caribou Baby, an eco-friendly maternity, baby and lifestyle store on the border of artsy Greenpoint and Williamsburg, has been drawing capacity crowds to its diaper-free Meetups, where parents exchange tips like how to get a baby to urinate on the street between parked cars.
Eww....just Eww! But, do read the entire article to get the whole story.
Your comments?
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)for most families, however.
And I'm not too thrilled about the idea of people training their children to go to the bathroom in the street.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)Unless one lived in a hut on the plains, it doesn't seem practical to me. Especially not in an urban area.
As a dog owner, picking up the blessings it deposits on our walks is tedious enough. I do it, though, to prevent dog feces from contaminating the environment. I haven't figured out what to do with the pee, though, so there it stays.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)Truly.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)I suspect that's a rule honored mostly in the breach.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)Even at the water line, a "lady" insisted she curb her dog, even tho' it was only pee.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)antiquie
(4,299 posts)ignore because it's natural and pretend it doesn't exist?
lumpy
(13,704 posts)She spent most of her day on baby toilet checking. That was the only occupation/interest she appeared to have. It was such a pain, not too many people wanted her visiting. Poor soul.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)MineralMan
(146,287 posts)from New Jersey.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Seriously though, sometimes it's as if NY is competing with San Fran in a smug off.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)So there!
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)and lick her offspring's butt clean.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...with a drain in the floor.
Just hose 'em down every two hours or so, and they do fine.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)And here I thought I was the only one...
antiquie
(4,299 posts)Yes, cloth diapers are a nuisance, but there is little diaper-rash (duh, you change them more often) and you aren't contributing to the mountains of disposables. Disposables should be a travel convenience. End granny rant.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)How many disposables are in landfills already? I wish I had a dollar for every one. If people must breed, they should at least be responsible about it.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)But their laundry situation makes it cost prohibitive. My sister's apt complex charges $6 to wash and dry one load of laundry, so it's cheaper for them to use disposables.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)I know laundromats are expensive but I thought diapers were even more so.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)My niece celebrated her 1st birthday a few weeks ago. I know that for the first few months of her life, she was fine on diapers because it was the default shower gift.
I think my sister orders them through Amazon's subscribe and save program and has them delivered.
If she had her own washer/dryer, she would probably use cloth. I've seen on other forums saying that for a first child, the costs are about the same and cloth is cheaper after the 2nd child (assuming you save the diapers from the 1st child). Knowing my sister, she probably made a spreadsheet with diaper costs to figure out her decision.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)TV a month or two ago where young women were drying out disposable diapers for re-use, or leaving their kids in them longer before changing because they are so expensive.
Their excuse for not using cloth diapers is that many don't have washers and dryers and laundromats don't allow dirty diapers.
I have no sympathy for them now after asking my mom how she dealt with my diapers 60 years ago when she and my dad lived in a crummy little two room apartment.
She washed my diapers by hand. In the bathtub. With a washboard and bleach, then hung them outside.
Just like her mother did for her...and her mother's mother...etc.
And when my own kids were young, I also had to do laundry in the bathtub, only I was lucky and had an extra room where I could dry it all.
I think maybe young people today do not want to piss and moan about how hard they have it when so many generations of women did what they had to do because they had no other choice.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)That's all it is.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)Therefore I don't have a dog in this fight. But in case you didn't notice, the world has changed in the last 60 years.
I personally line dry all my laundry (my skin reacts to dryer sheets) or use a drying rack, but most of the time it is indoors because I (as of 2 weeks, I was just transferred to another city for work) ago lived in an apartment complex without a yard (on the 3rd floor). There are many communities where you can't hang laundry (many HOA forbit it, which I think is insane). She lives in a major city and outside drying is unrealistic. I've seen older movies where clotheslines were between high rise buildings, but I think that would be illegal today. Laundry (let alone diapers) hanging outside is considered an eyesore today.
And my sister's apartment does not have a bathtub, it just has shower. I don't think I've ever seen a washboard in person (just in movies and TV).
I never thought I'd be defending my (staunchly Republican, married into money) sister on this board (money is not an issue for them), but I guess I am (I barely get along with her, but I maintain a relationship with her so I can have a relationship with my 1 year old niece).
I'll get off your lawn now.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)diaper service works. Rethinking, staunch Republicans may think land fills are good things.
Freddie
(9,259 posts)Very few if any day-care centers will allow cloth diapers.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)I was lucky enough to work evenings while my dad watched my son so I was able to stay home with him days until he was three.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)disposable diapers did not exist. I used a diaper service. I dumped the baby shit in the toilet and put the dirty diapers in a diaper pail provided by the service, which they picked up, and then delivered clean diapers the next day. I doubt that diaper services exist now.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)of twin boys with a 9-5 job. Just when the hell was I supposed to wash all those diapers?
I used disposable ones. I would rather my evening be spent with the boys rather than dragging them to the laundromat.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)I was a single mom at 15, put the diaper pail on the back of the stroller, put my son in the seat, the rest of the laundry on top of the stroller and walked three blocks to the laundramat every other day. But it was only one. I am in awe of all mothers of multiples who keep it together.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Once you get into the groove (and get used to little sleep) it's wasn't too bad. My laundromat was was about 2 blocks away. I had one of those 2 wheeled grocery carts. I would push the stroller with one hand and drag the cart behind me with the other.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Changing diapers often when wet makes the whole process easier and baby gets used to being dry/happier.
Washing machine was a snap, used bleach, soap. No dryer, hung in sun or on racks. Very little diaper rash, didn't need powder or ointments, happier bottom. The cleaning diaper process was not that time consuming for me. I worked out methods that worked for me.
Letting the baby get sopping wet is a nono; changing often is important. All 4 kids were potty trained by year and a half. I have known babies using disposables that have nasty diaper rash. I suspect they need changing more often.
I would probably use cloth dipes if I were raising babies. All those dirty diapers in land fills, plastic that doesn't degrade, the expense. Wow
antiquie
(4,299 posts)You are so right about this making it easier to potty train.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Let your kid shit all over your house so that you can be all smug and superior towards the other parents down at the natural organic wholefood cooperative.
Diapers were invented for a reason.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)So I judge, also.
Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #10)
badtoworse This message was self-deleted by its author.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)I thought that Indigo Children / Crystal children bullshit was the height of Woo-Woo stupidity, but this tops that.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Even worse is letting the kid crap and piss all over somebody elses house. They would be shown the door after they thoroughly cleaned up their little darling's mess.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Manages to raise their kids without diapers? This is the way much of the planet has done it, and how everyone did it before diapers came along, a relatively new invention.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)Truly.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Truly.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)what happens then?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)would you expect the babysitter, day care worker or whoever to follow the kid around waiting for the dearie to gift them with a bodily function?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Being labeled as "new-age hipster nonsense"?
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I see you have no answer to my question.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Do you agree or disagree that it is accurate to label it as "new-age hipster nonsense"?
Of course it may not be the best solution for working parents, but it can work. My wife is a school teacher an I work full time and we managed to do it.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Since that is what I posted in response to NB's post.
I assume you expected the day care person to follow your kid around with a bowl? Or did you diaper when you weren't there?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I urge you to educate yourself on this method before continuing.
No one need follow a child around with a bowl. It about observing the child and recognizing the signs that a poop or pee may be imminent, and then curing the chd the acknowledge that sensation and go when it is appropriate.
It's funny how when something that costs nothing and wastes nothing meets such resistance from consumers. It's as if we have been programmed to think we need disposable diapers and all the other crap we think we need to raise a child. YMMV.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I was a single mom of twin boys with a 9-5 job. I did not have the luxury of alternative methods.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)That's not a negative, it's just what worked for you. This works for many here in this country, and it works for most everyone else in the rest of the world where Proctor & Gamble products are unaffordable (which is a majority of the planets population).
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Were you second shift or something?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)We have folks with that function now. They're usually called the press corp, usually the ones following that other party.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)home while the spouse works. More time to do their own household necessities and, more importantly, more time for their kids to teach and nurture them. We see kids shuttled to babysitters, wide eyed, confused while in a sea of hurry hurry, hanging on to Mom while she tries to catch up on doing her necessary errands. Children should have the comforts/advantages of a mother or father at home instead of someone else. Children then just become a sideline.
Of course there are those who have no alternatives and struggle with life and are to be applauded for carrying on for their children.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)that other people just might dream about. We don't use twigs to brush our teeth either.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)The article in the OP is very misleading and not a very old example of how this really works.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Raised without limits (in the 1960's).
Short story:
All three kids are now bums, thieves, and drug addicts. A real danger to themselves, their parents, and society. They lived in a huge well-to-do upper class neighborhood. They turned their house into a total sty.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Not using diapers caused that? Really?
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Of letting kids grow "naturally" and find their own way.
This is not new, its a throwback to flower children.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Methods.
Communication elimination alone did not lead to hat happened to those people.
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)As if a decision to use this technique was decoupled and uncorrelated to any general child rearing philosophy.
I would venture to guess that those who adopt this method of toilet training do so as part of a more general child rearing philosophy.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Controversy.
Now we have a happy 4yo that lives in a "normal" household. The only difference is when she goes to school, she is one of the few in her age group that can use the toilet alone, doesn't wear pull-up "big kid" diapers, and sleeps through the night without wetting the bed.
YMMV
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)4 year olds that are not toilet trained? I find it incredibly hard to believe your daughter is "one of the few" that is. Incredibly hard.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Are wearing "pull-up" diapers, just in case they have an accident. Doesn't mean that they are not using the toilet, just that they aren't fully in control of their bodily functions just yet.
Look at the advertising. Diaper companies make diapers for kids up to 7 years old and sell a lot of them!
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)have the rule that the kids must be toilet trained (as do many of the day care facililties). For any child 4+. Some people nurse their children until then so I know there is some weird parenting in the US but regardless of what the parents do, the schools and childcare facilities have those rules in place. My own sister told me when my nephew was 3 that she had to get him toilet trained very soon (and was upset he wasn't already) because he wouldn't be able to start school if he wasn't.
I read your opening post that said that it's a communication thing - that the kids will recognize the feelings of having to go and overcome them. How does that work with a 1-2 year old?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)We started on day 5 of our daughters life, when it had been a couple of hours since he had last peed. I held her from behind and under her knees so whe was in a sitting position and I hovered her over a large Tupperware bowl (conspicuously labeled as her potty bowl) an made a psss psss psss sound and viola! She peed right there! We have a picture of that moment with me looking up at my wife taking the picture and I had this "WTF? This really works?" Look on my face. Priceless!
Soon after, we just started to recognize her gestures that indicated she needed to go, so we would hover her over the toilet and make the sounds and she went! By 6 months, she would sleep through the night without peeing herself. We would have her go before she went to sleep, then a few hours later we would get her up as we were going to bed and put her on the toilet an make the sound an she would pee. She went right back to sleep and didn't need to go again until the morning.
Thinking back, I'm still amazed at how easy it was, how few diapers I actually had to change, and how much money we saved. It was incredible!
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to stay at home with your daughter. It sounds like a great method if you have the time to dedicate to it.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)I happen to think it's BS. If the stay-at-home moms want to do this in their own home, fine. If they try to do that with their darlings in my vet clinic, they will be discouraged. It's a public health hazard.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Good catch, thanks.
As to your othe comments, understanding this better may change your opinion. Learn more about it if you care to, the article in the OP terribly mischarachterizes it.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)And I really do think it's a public health hazard, along with being disgusting.
I have a degree in microbiology. I do know poop.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)The article in the OP is very misleading a d does not accurately represent what is going on.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)MineralMan
(146,287 posts)Amazing...
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)I have absolutely been at parties and witnessed people putting their baby over the sink, she said. One client took her baby and her bowl to a party, held her naked baby over the bowl, and she just did it at this persons party in the corner, but obviously they were close friends, Ms. Shapiro said.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)Not at my party. "Out the door, mom, and don't come back." Amazing.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Response to MicaelS (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)A city where LOTS of people use the street for body waste.
I used to have to put Vicks in my nose every day when I worked there.
Never could figure out why teh Health Dept. did not seem too excited about gutters being used as urinals...
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)You would think a Progressive city like SF would care more about cleanliness.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)between parked cars. Agree the practice is disgusting.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)My dad was born in 1938. I don't think she started from birth, but she had him out of diapers very early using the same techniques. My mom thought the idea was ridiculous and wouldn't do it, and my grandmother gave her a hard time about it.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)and I knew a few parents trying it even then. It wasn't my cup of tea - I tried it but I royally sucked. I caught my baby a few times and held her over the toilet, but I thought holding her over the sink or tub was gross, so I never continued. I can see it working with some babies - some babies ARE predictable. My oldest was but I didn't try it with her, I tried it with my second but she was totally unpredictable, as were my next 2 (but I didn't bother trying it with them).
I think that if you can hold your child over the toilet or potty, it's no more 'ew' than changing a diaper, emptying a potty or wiping a kid's butt which is something all parents have to do anyway. I'm not a fan of sinks and bowls all over the house though. blech. And on the road? all kinds of wrong....I don't even like it when dogs pee on the sidewalk or street - my dog has a designated spot in the back yard and that's the only place she's supposed to go, unless I order her otherwise.
Oh, and this is totally not doable for people with jobs. And you generally have to 'wear' your baby 24/7 to be successful. And you have to have a predictable baby. So, it CAN work for some, but it's not feasible for most people anyway. If you WANT to do this though - go ahead - the environment will thank you - just keep it in your house TYVM.
JEFF9K
(1,935 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)On our daughters fifth day of life, she peed in a bowl. We never looked back. While we did use a few disposable diapers for when we might be in a place where getting to to go would be inappropriate, and we did use reusable pre-fold diapers at night, we changed very few dirty diapers for her first two years. When she was 25 months old we took the plunge and removed the diapers altogether and she has been using a toilet ever since.
Watching your child for the cues they give when they new to go an responding to those cues is the key.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)From a younger age they will keep diapers on at night but significantly reduce the hours during the day.
If there is an accident the floors are wooden or tile and easily cleaned.
Part of it is based on the past where almost no diapers were used and some on the searing heat that makes them uncomfortable.
The result is that Thai children are potty trained months and months before Americans although the actual process takes longer.
Our daughter stopped wearing diapers during the day on her first birthday.
Thais who see visitors walking around with kids 3,4, and even 5 wearing diapers will stare in amazement.
I am guessing that the prolonged use of diapers in the US is based in part on heavy advertising from commercial interests who want to see the longest possible term for diaper wearing and that the amount of diapers could be reduced by 60-70% if we wanted to.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I just don't think that this no diapers thing would work for families where both parents have to work.
I can't believe that there are kids 3+ that still wear diapers.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)deurbano
(2,894 posts)I remember when my son was young, there was a commercial with Dr. Brazelton about how parents shouldn't "rush" toilet training. I liked that doc, and given his other parenting tips, I'm sure he honestly held that point of view, but his advice was featured within the context of a Pampers commercial! (I believe it was introducing a larger sized pamper for bigger toddlers.)
I think the way Thai children are raised is probably similar to other less Westernized/wealthy countries. I saw toddlers in China squatting on the street. My younger daughter was born in Vietnam, but I didn't notice how the Vietnamese coped with that particular issue. All I know is that in an oppressively hot (for me, coming from San Francisco, anyway!) environment, with high, high humidity, the custom was to wrap young babies (my daughter was only six months old) up like they were in Antarctica when going "outside"! (Outside is in quotes because the orphanage was kind of "open air," anyway.) I have to say she immediately seemed to prefer wearing much less clothing, back in our hotel room with the AC blasting. (I rationalized that I needed to prepare her for her new environment in SF!)
At any rate, I think my son, my younger daughter, my own interests and the environment would have been better served by foregoing Dr. Brazelton's advice in that area.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)BTW if your daughter was born in Vietnam and left on a visa she probably left on the ODP (Orderly Departure Programme)
I started that programme working for the IOM in November 1989.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)My mother says that because she used cloth, she knew the second I was wet and she changed me immediately. Supposedly this meant that I never got used to wet or dirty diapers, and supposedly this is why I was "trained" at about a year old.
Or maybe my mother was just really well trained!
I didn't use her method, though. I just waited till for some warm weather when my kids were around two, explained about the potty and let them run around without any pants or diapers on. It took just one or two accidents before they got the idea.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)It was no big deal.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)dem in texas
(2,674 posts)This is stupid and disgusting. Think of the germs with urine and fecal matter all over the house in open bowls. yuk!
Teaching a child to urinate in the street? It's crazy town!
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)Do they expect Day Care with many kids, a Sitter, or Grandma to do this?
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)don't work. Otherwise, I can't see how it would be possible. How it would be desirable, I don't know, either.
My mother said that I was completely toilet trained by 15 months. Since I was walking everywhere at 12 months, and talking a blue streak, she tells me that she talked me through toilet training, explaining it to me. Apparently, I caught on quickly.
LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)Who would take the job of watching these kids? Probably the wrong kind of person.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)It's not magic. It's not new-age nonsense. It's not naked kids running around pissing and shitting themselves.
It's the opposite of all of that.
murielm99
(30,733 posts)We used cloth diapers, even though they were hard to find. The disposables were saved for travel and similar situations.
I found that my babies got more diaper rash with disposables. But everyone has to use common sense. This lacks common sense. It is lacking in courtesy to others, too.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)but it makes no sense for infants and children nowhere near ready for potty training not to mention being EXTREMELY unrealistic!
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)We started on day 5 of our child's life and worked as advertised. YMMV.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)MineralMan
(146,287 posts)yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)it can be done.
Just let the baby run ( or crawl or roll - depending on age) free in the back yard!
An adult (or sibling, perhaps) can move the poop to a specific area when they go out to feed the child.
It would probably be best to bring the child in at night, though.
Maybe put the child in a room with newspaper on the floor? I haven't thought that part out yet.
Oh...in cold weather...I'll have to think about that one, too...
maybe this isn't a good idea.
d_r
(6,907 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)This is how most of the worlds population does it. It's not new, it's old, and it works. What's dumb is paying thousands of dollars for disposable diapers that clog landfills ad harm the environment.
d_r
(6,907 posts)you have different child rearing practices that make perfect sense in your environment and culture. In NYC this is dumb. Sorry, its my opinion.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You seem to actually understand very little about what Elimination Communication really is about. Perhaps if you really understood the concept your opinion would be different.
d_r
(6,907 posts)I'm not argue with you over it. More power to them. Peace.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)And it really just comes down to personal and responsible choices. YMMV
Peace to you as well.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)People did lots of things until sanitation practices became better. I would be interested to know the rates of disease and infection in the majority of countries that still practice this.
lumpy
(13,704 posts)I advocate for cloth diapers if they are not affordable. Doubt if the US is going to go for the bare bottom method.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You may be surprised to find how much more sanitary it is to void one's self into a receptacle and not into a diaper where it's smeared all over the skin and such.
dem in texas
(2,674 posts)Back in the late 1950' and early 60's, I used cloth diapers. Disposable were available but were expensive and really bad, couldn't hold the urine. I only used them when we traveled. I would not start to potty train my kids until they were waking up dry in the mornings. What you did then was put them in the little cotton training pants. The reason was that when they did have accident, it would be unpleasant for them and therefore make it easier to get them to use the potty. it worked very well for my 3 kids, it usually took 2 or 3 week to train them. My daughters did this for their kids as well and now the little cotton training panties have cute designs printed on them and the kids love to wear them. I can't image a 4 year old wear those disposable pants.
hunter
(38,311 posts)... it wasn't something we could afford ourselves.
My wife or I, one or the other, was always home. We let the kids run around naked in the back yard a lot.
I was changing diapers when I was ten years old. That kind of experience will make a teenager pay a whole lot of attention to that birth control stuff...
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Or with someone else?
I mean, seriously, what a goddamn mess.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You can't.
The entire point of this is to show off how much you don't work for a living and how much more you devote your life to your child. It's a way for some parents to "one-up" other parents.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)MineralMan
(146,287 posts)Maybe we can sell them diapers?
Avalux
(35,015 posts)and then the little one could be dunked in a river afterwards, would be great.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)This is one of them.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)frankly. I can't imagine it as part of my life.
ileus
(15,396 posts)I didn't give two shots about.
Glad those years are behind me...
JI7
(89,247 posts)lynne
(3,118 posts)- and that's about it. Mom is turned into an excrement look-out station and, of course, will soon be able to identify when the baby needs to poo/pee. Most all mothers do the same thing except they know it will soon be time to change a diaper and not to go grabbing a cereal bowl for catching. Ewwww . . .
Seems to me that Mom is going to be with the child 24/7 until it's potty trained. I know I wouldn't babysit in that situation!
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)i.e., at around 18 mos.-2 years, for everyone's convenience, but I can't imagine doing it any earlier than that.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)Eight of us were out at brunch and her daughter stood on a chair in the restaurant and peed all over the place.
I was flabbergasted and everybody else was like "no biggie" (or maybe too embarrassed to say anything).
It was fucking DISGUSTING and ruined my meal.
Hell. No.
Fucking hippies. Grrr.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I'm not sure what that was, but EC it was not.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)This is how humans have done this for all of time before diapers came along. Its how most of the rest of the world still does it.
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)And I'm betting those fine folks who crossed the Bering strait and then later built the penthouse on top of Peru probably had their babies wrapped up in something.
And definitely for the first family with four walls and roof which I think was way back in the realm of "all time"