Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:56 AM Sep 2013

On the Subject of Diapers, How about Diaperless Child-Rearing?

Check this out:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/nyregion/babys-latest-going-diaperless-at-home-or-even-in-the-park.html

Baby’s Latest: Going Diaperless

When Jada Shapiro decided to raise her daughter from birth without diapers, for the most part, not everyone was amused. Ms. Shapiro scattered little bowls around the house to catch her daughter’s offerings, and her sister insisted that she use a big, dark marker to mark the bowls so that they could never find their way back to the kitchen.

But “elimination communication,” as the diaper-free method of child-rearing is called, is finding an audience in the hipper precincts of New York City.

Ms. Shapiro, who is a doula, a birth and child-rearing coach, says it is practically now a job qualification to at least be able to offer diaper-free training as an option to clients. Caribou Baby, an “eco-friendly maternity, baby and lifestyle store” on the border of artsy Greenpoint and Williamsburg, has been drawing capacity crowds to its diaper-free “Meetups,” where parents exchange tips like how to get a baby to urinate on the street between parked cars.


Eww....just Eww! But, do read the entire article to get the whole story.

Your comments?
134 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the Subject of Diapers, How about Diaperless Child-Rearing? (Original Post) MineralMan Sep 2013 OP
That might be just fine for an at-home parent with unlimited time. It's not realistic pnwmom Sep 2013 #1
I'd think it wouldn't be realistic for almost anyone, really. MineralMan Sep 2013 #4
In Laguna, you would bag the beach sand. antiquie Sep 2013 #7
Seriously? MineralMan Sep 2013 #9
My sister lived there for 40 years. antiquie Sep 2013 #21
What do they do with the fish pee in the water? jberryhill Sep 2013 #28
Not certain, antiquie Sep 2013 #30
About 50 years ago I met a mother who was using the no diaper method. God awful method. lumpy Sep 2013 #99
New York, our smugness will soon be viewable from space. JaneyVee Sep 2013 #2
And, perhaps, noticeable from its odor MineralMan Sep 2013 #6
NJ smells like a diaper-less child. JaneyVee Sep 2013 #11
LOL! My baby's more natural than your baby! MineralMan Sep 2013 #15
Then the mother in the OP should do like the mama cat in my shed Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #95
Yeah, we had a ceramic floor and a hose in the nursery.... jberryhill Sep 2013 #3
There ya go! MineralMan Sep 2013 #8
That's what we do with Grandpa! tazkcmo Sep 2013 #27
No baby bottoms on pubic toilet seats in my family! antiquie Sep 2013 #5
I agree, travel convenience. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #25
I know people who would use cloth tabbycat31 Sep 2013 #52
Do coupons make disposables affordable? antiquie Sep 2013 #53
I'm not sure her exact situation tabbycat31 Sep 2013 #55
I saw something on pipi_k Sep 2013 #77
It's excuses Aerows Sep 2013 #87
Many people are living beyond their means for convenience sake. lumpy Sep 2013 #101
I have no kids tabbycat31 Sep 2013 #115
If money is not an issue antiquie Sep 2013 #126
Day care is the problem Freddie Sep 2013 #120
That's terrible. I hope they help potty train. antiquie Sep 2013 #129
Many, many years ago when my kids were babies, RebelOne Sep 2013 #109
I was a single mom HappyMe Sep 2013 #54
Moms of twins get special dispensation to use whatever works. antiquie Sep 2013 #56
Thanks. HappyMe Sep 2013 #59
I'm with you. Without a washing machine I used boiling method ( excellent sterilization), lumpy Sep 2013 #98
"baby gets used to being dry" antiquie Sep 2013 #127
Stupid hipster new-age nonsense. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #10
Yup. MineralMan Sep 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author badtoworse Sep 2013 #18
You got it. MicaelS Sep 2013 #19
I agree. HappyMe Sep 2013 #24
New-age hipster nonsense? Ever stop to consider just how the majority of the rest of the world cleanhippie Sep 2013 #32
I've seen it in action. It won't work in an urban setting. MineralMan Sep 2013 #36
I've seen it in action, too. It worked as advertised right here in our little slice of urban heaven. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #45
If both parents have to work, HappyMe Sep 2013 #40
What does that have to do with this wing called "new-age hipster nonsense"? cleanhippie Sep 2013 #43
If both parents have to work, HappyMe Sep 2013 #47
Again, what does any of that have to do with this method of dealing with poop and pee cleanhippie Sep 2013 #58
I didn't come up with that phrase. HappyMe Sep 2013 #60
Yet you responded to my questioning that label with an unrelated question. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #63
Obviously I agree. HappyMe Sep 2013 #64
I expected the child-care provider to care for my child in the appropriate way. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #65
I'm 55 so there are no babies in my future. HappyMe Sep 2013 #66
Sure you did, you just chose not to utilize them. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #69
Just curious, but how did you manage this when both of you were working? Gormy Cuss Sep 2013 #73
why not? discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2013 #62
Some women with children making minimum wage have decided they could save money by staying lumpy Sep 2013 #110
In some of those countries people have no other choice. We do have choices in this country lumpy Sep 2013 #103
It seems that you really just don't understand what's actually going on with this. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #104
And I don't need to know lumpy Sep 2013 #111
I know a real life case. Children now fully grown Xipe Totec Sep 2013 #13
All of that is because of "communication elimination"? cleanhippie Sep 2013 #42
It's a pattern. Xipe Totec Sep 2013 #44
You seem to be lumping not-using-diapers in with a whole range if other alternative parenting cleanhippie Sep 2013 #46
You seem to think that this technique can be adopted in a vacuum Xipe Totec Sep 2013 #50
We used it successfully, and without adopting any other parenting methods that would be cause for cleanhippie Sep 2013 #61
Really? leftynyc Sep 2013 #71
Maybe look a little closer. You may be surprised to find how many 4-6 year olds cleanhippie Sep 2013 #72
All the schools in our area leftynyc Sep 2013 #74
For us, it worked like a charm. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #79
I'm guessing you were able leftynyc Sep 2013 #112
It's called "elimination communication". A type of communication, and NOT a type of elimination. kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #86
Haha, you're right! My dyslexia must be working overtime today! cleanhippie Sep 2013 #92
I'm not interested. I can't stand babies of diaper age. I'm past childbearing age. kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #97
What is The public health hazard? cleanhippie Sep 2013 #102
Disgusting, really disgusting. MicaelS Sep 2013 #14
Yes. That line caught my eye as well. MineralMan Sep 2013 #17
The best quote's near the end. pnwmom Sep 2013 #20
Well, Uff da! That's what I can say about that. MineralMan Sep 2013 #23
It's my party and I'll throw you out for having your baby pee in the punch bowl if I want to! Arugula Latte Sep 2013 #93
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #39
that's to prepare for living in San Francisco, I think. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #75
That is awful. MicaelS Sep 2013 #76
Well, it could get worse, they can starttrading tips on how to get the kid to solid waste bluestate10 Sep 2013 #131
My grandmother did this with my father. Mariana Sep 2013 #16
Look on the bright side. They'll be ready if Occupy starts camping in public parks in the future badtoworse Sep 2013 #22
Not really 'latest' as my oldest is 16 laundry_queen Sep 2013 #26
Thinking outside the Pamper. I like it! JEFF9K Sep 2013 #29
We did this. Elimination communication works as advertised. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #31
There is a middle ground. The Thais use significantly fewer diapers. grantcart Sep 2013 #33
My sons were potty trained when they were 11 months old. HappyMe Sep 2013 #38
I agree but it seems that a lot do. grantcart Sep 2013 #51
You're dead on about the commercial interests. deurbano Sep 2013 #68
Interesting grantcart Sep 2013 #91
Well, thank you VERY much, then! She has brought so much joy to our lives! deurbano Sep 2013 #107
And another is to use significantly MORE diapers, cloth diapers without a waterproof cover. pnwmom Sep 2013 #100
That is the clue, check and change immediately. My 4 were trained at 1-1/2 lumpy Sep 2013 #114
Oh, just use a big litterbox! LiberalEsto Sep 2013 #34
What do you do? Housebreak them like a dog? dem in texas Sep 2013 #35
How many mothers work? HockeyMom Sep 2013 #37
No idea. I suspect that the women doing this MineralMan Sep 2013 #41
I can just see these kids running around shitting all over everything. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #48
A common misconception held by those that do not understand this method. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #80
This is ridiculous. murielm99 Sep 2013 #49
I know that there is a certain school of thought about doing this during potty training Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2013 #57
Except that none of that is true at all. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #82
LOL..."rearing." Iggo Sep 2013 #67
Yes. It does bring new meaning to the word, doesn't it? MineralMan Sep 2013 #70
As long as one has a fenced yard that can be child-proofed... yawnmaster Sep 2013 #78
people come up with the dumbest things d_r Sep 2013 #81
This is what humans have been doing for eternity until diaper companies came along. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #83
If you are a Digo in Africa d_r Sep 2013 #85
You can have your opinion, but it seems to come from ignorance not knowledge. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #90
call me ignorant then d_r Sep 2013 #121
Just to be clear, I'm not calling you ignorant, just your opinion on this subject. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #125
Older isn't always better. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #106
We like to think that we have advanced from using Mother Natures methods of waste control. lumpy Sep 2013 #117
Don't discount Mother Nature. She has been at this much longer that we have. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #119
Way back in the Dark Ages dem in texas Sep 2013 #84
My mom bought us cloth diaper service for our kids... hunter Sep 2013 #88
Uh...how exactly do you do this unless you never leave your child alone? Arkana Sep 2013 #89
That's the point. jeff47 Sep 2013 #118
Adding fuel to the fire: Here's an account of the prevalence of this practice in urban China: Arugula Latte Sep 2013 #94
I think that's something we shouldn't import from China. MineralMan Sep 2013 #96
If people lived in nature where baby waste could just be absorbed into the earth... Avalux Sep 2013 #105
There's a lot of fads designed to exclude working mothers. jeff47 Sep 2013 #108
I suppose so. It's an alien world to me, MineralMan Sep 2013 #113
maybe if I was rentijg or living in a home ileus Sep 2013 #116
are these the same ones who think it's great to give birth in a pool with dolphins JI7 Sep 2013 #122
Well, Mom gets trained - lynne Sep 2013 #123
I let my kids go diaperless much of the time when they were potty training, Blue_In_AK Sep 2013 #124
I have a new agey friend who did this and just HELL NO MadrasT Sep 2013 #128
What your friends child did is NOT Elimination Communication at all. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #132
The wheel we have is round enough Boom Sound 416 Sep 2013 #130
This is the wheel. cleanhippie Sep 2013 #133
The world also used smoke signals Boom Sound 416 Sep 2013 #134

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
1. That might be just fine for an at-home parent with unlimited time. It's not realistic
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:58 AM
Sep 2013

for most families, however.

And I'm not too thrilled about the idea of people training their children to go to the bathroom in the street.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
4. I'd think it wouldn't be realistic for almost anyone, really.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:01 AM
Sep 2013

Unless one lived in a hut on the plains, it doesn't seem practical to me. Especially not in an urban area.

As a dog owner, picking up the blessings it deposits on our walks is tedious enough. I do it, though, to prevent dog feces from contaminating the environment. I haven't figured out what to do with the pee, though, so there it stays.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
21. My sister lived there for 40 years.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:11 AM
Sep 2013

Even at the water line, a "lady" insisted she curb her dog, even tho' it was only pee.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
99. About 50 years ago I met a mother who was using the no diaper method. God awful method.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:15 PM
Sep 2013

She spent most of her day on baby toilet checking. That was the only occupation/interest she appeared to have. It was such a pain, not too many people wanted her visiting. Poor soul.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
11. NJ smells like a diaper-less child.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:06 AM
Sep 2013

Seriously though, sometimes it's as if NY is competing with San Fran in a smug off.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
3. Yeah, we had a ceramic floor and a hose in the nursery....
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:01 AM
Sep 2013

...with a drain in the floor.

Just hose 'em down every two hours or so, and they do fine.
 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
5. No baby bottoms on pubic toilet seats in my family!
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:01 AM
Sep 2013

Yes, cloth diapers are a nuisance, but there is little diaper-rash (duh, you change them more often) and you aren't contributing to the mountains of disposables. Disposables should be a travel convenience. End granny rant.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
25. I agree, travel convenience.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:14 AM
Sep 2013

How many disposables are in landfills already? I wish I had a dollar for every one. If people must breed, they should at least be responsible about it.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)
52. I know people who would use cloth
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:03 PM
Sep 2013

But their laundry situation makes it cost prohibitive. My sister's apt complex charges $6 to wash and dry one load of laundry, so it's cheaper for them to use disposables.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
53. Do coupons make disposables affordable?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:06 PM
Sep 2013

I know laundromats are expensive but I thought diapers were even more so.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)
55. I'm not sure her exact situation
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:12 PM
Sep 2013

My niece celebrated her 1st birthday a few weeks ago. I know that for the first few months of her life, she was fine on diapers because it was the default shower gift.

I think my sister orders them through Amazon's subscribe and save program and has them delivered.

If she had her own washer/dryer, she would probably use cloth. I've seen on other forums saying that for a first child, the costs are about the same and cloth is cheaper after the 2nd child (assuming you save the diapers from the 1st child). Knowing my sister, she probably made a spreadsheet with diaper costs to figure out her decision.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
77. I saw something on
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:31 PM
Sep 2013

TV a month or two ago where young women were drying out disposable diapers for re-use, or leaving their kids in them longer before changing because they are so expensive.

Their excuse for not using cloth diapers is that many don't have washers and dryers and laundromats don't allow dirty diapers.

I have no sympathy for them now after asking my mom how she dealt with my diapers 60 years ago when she and my dad lived in a crummy little two room apartment.

She washed my diapers by hand. In the bathtub. With a washboard and bleach, then hung them outside.

Just like her mother did for her...and her mother's mother...etc.

And when my own kids were young, I also had to do laundry in the bathtub, only I was lucky and had an extra room where I could dry it all.

I think maybe young people today do not want to piss and moan about how hard they have it when so many generations of women did what they had to do because they had no other choice.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)
115. I have no kids
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

Therefore I don't have a dog in this fight. But in case you didn't notice, the world has changed in the last 60 years.

I personally line dry all my laundry (my skin reacts to dryer sheets) or use a drying rack, but most of the time it is indoors because I (as of 2 weeks, I was just transferred to another city for work) ago lived in an apartment complex without a yard (on the 3rd floor). There are many communities where you can't hang laundry (many HOA forbit it, which I think is insane). She lives in a major city and outside drying is unrealistic. I've seen older movies where clotheslines were between high rise buildings, but I think that would be illegal today. Laundry (let alone diapers) hanging outside is considered an eyesore today.

And my sister's apartment does not have a bathtub, it just has shower. I don't think I've ever seen a washboard in person (just in movies and TV).

I never thought I'd be defending my (staunchly Republican, married into money) sister on this board (money is not an issue for them), but I guess I am (I barely get along with her, but I maintain a relationship with her so I can have a relationship with my 1 year old niece).

I'll get off your lawn now.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
126. If money is not an issue
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 07:19 PM
Sep 2013

diaper service works. Rethinking, staunch Republicans may think land fills are good things.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
129. That's terrible. I hope they help potty train.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 07:24 PM
Sep 2013

I was lucky enough to work evenings while my dad watched my son so I was able to stay home with him days until he was three.

RebelOne

(30,947 posts)
109. Many, many years ago when my kids were babies,
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

disposable diapers did not exist. I used a diaper service. I dumped the baby shit in the toilet and put the dirty diapers in a diaper pail provided by the service, which they picked up, and then delivered clean diapers the next day. I doubt that diaper services exist now.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
54. I was a single mom
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:09 PM
Sep 2013

of twin boys with a 9-5 job. Just when the hell was I supposed to wash all those diapers?

I used disposable ones. I would rather my evening be spent with the boys rather than dragging them to the laundromat.

 

antiquie

(4,299 posts)
56. Moms of twins get special dispensation to use whatever works.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:13 PM
Sep 2013

I was a single mom at 15, put the diaper pail on the back of the stroller, put my son in the seat, the rest of the laundry on top of the stroller and walked three blocks to the laundramat every other day. But it was only one. I am in awe of all mothers of multiples who keep it together.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
59. Thanks.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:21 PM
Sep 2013


Once you get into the groove (and get used to little sleep) it's wasn't too bad. My laundromat was was about 2 blocks away. I had one of those 2 wheeled grocery carts. I would push the stroller with one hand and drag the cart behind me with the other.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
98. I'm with you. Without a washing machine I used boiling method ( excellent sterilization),
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:04 PM
Sep 2013

Changing diapers often when wet makes the whole process easier and baby gets used to being dry/happier.
Washing machine was a snap, used bleach, soap. No dryer, hung in sun or on racks. Very little diaper rash, didn't need powder or ointments, happier bottom. The cleaning diaper process was not that time consuming for me. I worked out methods that worked for me.
Letting the baby get sopping wet is a nono; changing often is important. All 4 kids were potty trained by year and a half. I have known babies using disposables that have nasty diaper rash. I suspect they need changing more often.
I would probably use cloth dipes if I were raising babies. All those dirty diapers in land fills, plastic that doesn't degrade, the expense. Wow

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
10. Stupid hipster new-age nonsense.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:05 AM
Sep 2013

Let your kid shit all over your house so that you can be all smug and superior towards the other parents down at the natural organic wholefood cooperative.

Diapers were invented for a reason.

Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #10)

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
19. You got it.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:10 AM
Sep 2013

I thought that Indigo Children / Crystal children bullshit was the height of Woo-Woo stupidity, but this tops that.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
24. I agree.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:13 AM
Sep 2013

Even worse is letting the kid crap and piss all over somebody elses house. They would be shown the door after they thoroughly cleaned up their little darling's mess.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
32. New-age hipster nonsense? Ever stop to consider just how the majority of the rest of the world
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:35 AM
Sep 2013

Manages to raise their kids without diapers? This is the way much of the planet has done it, and how everyone did it before diapers came along, a relatively new invention.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
45. I've seen it in action, too. It worked as advertised right here in our little slice of urban heaven.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:53 AM
Sep 2013

Truly.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
47. If both parents have to work,
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:55 AM
Sep 2013

would you expect the babysitter, day care worker or whoever to follow the kid around waiting for the dearie to gift them with a bodily function?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
58. Again, what does any of that have to do with this method of dealing with poop and pee
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:20 PM
Sep 2013

Being labeled as "new-age hipster nonsense"?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
63. Yet you responded to my questioning that label with an unrelated question.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:37 PM
Sep 2013

Do you agree or disagree that it is accurate to label it as "new-age hipster nonsense"?

Of course it may not be the best solution for working parents, but it can work. My wife is a school teacher an I work full time and we managed to do it.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
64. Obviously I agree.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:42 PM
Sep 2013

Since that is what I posted in response to NB's post.

I assume you expected the day care person to follow your kid around with a bowl? Or did you diaper when you weren't there?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
65. I expected the child-care provider to care for my child in the appropriate way.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:49 PM
Sep 2013

I urge you to educate yourself on this method before continuing.

No one need follow a child around with a bowl. It about observing the child and recognizing the signs that a poop or pee may be imminent, and then curing the chd the acknowledge that sensation and go when it is appropriate.

It's funny how when something that costs nothing and wastes nothing meets such resistance from consumers. It's as if we have been programmed to think we need disposable diapers and all the other crap we think we need to raise a child. YMMV.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
66. I'm 55 so there are no babies in my future.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:53 PM
Sep 2013

I was a single mom of twin boys with a 9-5 job. I did not have the luxury of alternative methods.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
69. Sure you did, you just chose not to utilize them.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:56 PM
Sep 2013

That's not a negative, it's just what worked for you. This works for many here in this country, and it works for most everyone else in the rest of the world where Proctor & Gamble products are unaffordable (which is a majority of the planets population).

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
73. Just curious, but how did you manage this when both of you were working?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:11 PM
Sep 2013

Were you second shift or something?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
62. why not?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:26 PM
Sep 2013

We have folks with that function now. They're usually called the press corp, usually the ones following that other party.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
110. Some women with children making minimum wage have decided they could save money by staying
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:00 PM
Sep 2013

home while the spouse works. More time to do their own household necessities and, more importantly, more time for their kids to teach and nurture them. We see kids shuttled to babysitters, wide eyed, confused while in a sea of hurry hurry, hanging on to Mom while she tries to catch up on doing her necessary errands. Children should have the comforts/advantages of a mother or father at home instead of someone else. Children then just become a sideline.
Of course there are those who have no alternatives and struggle with life and are to be applauded for carrying on for their children.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
103. In some of those countries people have no other choice. We do have choices in this country
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:38 PM
Sep 2013

that other people just might dream about. We don't use twigs to brush our teeth either.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
104. It seems that you really just don't understand what's actually going on with this.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:39 PM
Sep 2013

The article in the OP is very misleading and not a very old example of how this really works.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
13. I know a real life case. Children now fully grown
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:07 AM
Sep 2013

Raised without limits (in the 1960's).

Short story:

All three kids are now bums, thieves, and drug addicts. A real danger to themselves, their parents, and society. They lived in a huge well-to-do upper class neighborhood. They turned their house into a total sty.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
44. It's a pattern.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:52 AM
Sep 2013

Of letting kids grow "naturally" and find their own way.

This is not new, its a throwback to flower children.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
46. You seem to be lumping not-using-diapers in with a whole range if other alternative parenting
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:55 AM
Sep 2013

Methods.

Communication elimination alone did not lead to hat happened to those people.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
50. You seem to think that this technique can be adopted in a vacuum
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:59 AM
Sep 2013

As if a decision to use this technique was decoupled and uncorrelated to any general child rearing philosophy.

I would venture to guess that those who adopt this method of toilet training do so as part of a more general child rearing philosophy.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
61. We used it successfully, and without adopting any other parenting methods that would be cause for
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:24 PM
Sep 2013

Controversy.

Now we have a happy 4yo that lives in a "normal" household. The only difference is when she goes to school, she is one of the few in her age group that can use the toilet alone, doesn't wear pull-up "big kid" diapers, and sleeps through the night without wetting the bed.

YMMV

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
71. Really?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:01 PM
Sep 2013

4 year olds that are not toilet trained? I find it incredibly hard to believe your daughter is "one of the few" that is. Incredibly hard.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
72. Maybe look a little closer. You may be surprised to find how many 4-6 year olds
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:05 PM
Sep 2013

Are wearing "pull-up" diapers, just in case they have an accident. Doesn't mean that they are not using the toilet, just that they aren't fully in control of their bodily functions just yet.

Look at the advertising. Diaper companies make diapers for kids up to 7 years old and sell a lot of them!

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
74. All the schools in our area
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:20 PM
Sep 2013

have the rule that the kids must be toilet trained (as do many of the day care facililties). For any child 4+. Some people nurse their children until then so I know there is some weird parenting in the US but regardless of what the parents do, the schools and childcare facilities have those rules in place. My own sister told me when my nephew was 3 that she had to get him toilet trained very soon (and was upset he wasn't already) because he wouldn't be able to start school if he wasn't.

I read your opening post that said that it's a communication thing - that the kids will recognize the feelings of having to go and overcome them. How does that work with a 1-2 year old?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
79. For us, it worked like a charm.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:35 PM
Sep 2013

We started on day 5 of our daughters life, when it had been a couple of hours since he had last peed. I held her from behind and under her knees so whe was in a sitting position and I hovered her over a large Tupperware bowl (conspicuously labeled as her potty bowl) an made a psss psss psss sound and viola! She peed right there! We have a picture of that moment with me looking up at my wife taking the picture and I had this "WTF? This really works?" Look on my face. Priceless!

Soon after, we just started to recognize her gestures that indicated she needed to go, so we would hover her over the toilet and make the sounds and she went! By 6 months, she would sleep through the night without peeing herself. We would have her go before she went to sleep, then a few hours later we would get her up as we were going to bed and put her on the toilet an make the sound an she would pee. She went right back to sleep and didn't need to go again until the morning.

Thinking back, I'm still amazed at how easy it was, how few diapers I actually had to change, and how much money we saved. It was incredible!

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
112. I'm guessing you were able
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:07 PM
Sep 2013

to stay at home with your daughter. It sounds like a great method if you have the time to dedicate to it.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
86. It's called "elimination communication". A type of communication, and NOT a type of elimination.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:55 PM
Sep 2013

I happen to think it's BS. If the stay-at-home moms want to do this in their own home, fine. If they try to do that with their darlings in my vet clinic, they will be discouraged. It's a public health hazard.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
92. Haha, you're right! My dyslexia must be working overtime today!
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 02:18 PM
Sep 2013

Good catch, thanks.

As to your othe comments, understanding this better may change your opinion. Learn more about it if you care to, the article in the OP terribly mischarachterizes it.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
97. I'm not interested. I can't stand babies of diaper age. I'm past childbearing age.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:03 PM
Sep 2013

And I really do think it's a public health hazard, along with being disgusting.

I have a degree in microbiology. I do know poop.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
102. What is The public health hazard?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:35 PM
Sep 2013

The article in the OP is very misleading a d does not accurately represent what is going on.

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
14. Disgusting, really disgusting.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:07 AM
Sep 2013
where parents exchange tips like how to get a baby to urinate on the street between parked cars.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
20. The best quote's near the end.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:10 AM
Sep 2013

“I have absolutely been at parties and witnessed people putting their baby over the sink,” she said. One client took her baby and her bowl to a party, held her naked baby over the bowl, “and she just did it at this person’s party in the corner, but obviously they were close friends,” Ms. Shapiro said.

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
23. Well, Uff da! That's what I can say about that.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:12 AM
Sep 2013

Not at my party. "Out the door, mom, and don't come back." Amazing.

Response to MicaelS (Reply #14)

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
75. that's to prepare for living in San Francisco, I think.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:22 PM
Sep 2013

A city where LOTS of people use the street for body waste.
I used to have to put Vicks in my nose every day when I worked there.

Never could figure out why teh Health Dept. did not seem too excited about gutters being used as urinals...

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
131. Well, it could get worse, they can starttrading tips on how to get the kid to solid waste
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 07:49 PM
Sep 2013

between parked cars. Agree the practice is disgusting.

Mariana

(14,854 posts)
16. My grandmother did this with my father.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:08 AM
Sep 2013

My dad was born in 1938. I don't think she started from birth, but she had him out of diapers very early using the same techniques. My mom thought the idea was ridiculous and wouldn't do it, and my grandmother gave her a hard time about it.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
26. Not really 'latest' as my oldest is 16
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:15 AM
Sep 2013

and I knew a few parents trying it even then. It wasn't my cup of tea - I tried it but I royally sucked. I caught my baby a few times and held her over the toilet, but I thought holding her over the sink or tub was gross, so I never continued. I can see it working with some babies - some babies ARE predictable. My oldest was but I didn't try it with her, I tried it with my second but she was totally unpredictable, as were my next 2 (but I didn't bother trying it with them).

I think that if you can hold your child over the toilet or potty, it's no more 'ew' than changing a diaper, emptying a potty or wiping a kid's butt which is something all parents have to do anyway. I'm not a fan of sinks and bowls all over the house though. blech. And on the road? all kinds of wrong....I don't even like it when dogs pee on the sidewalk or street - my dog has a designated spot in the back yard and that's the only place she's supposed to go, unless I order her otherwise.

Oh, and this is totally not doable for people with jobs. And you generally have to 'wear' your baby 24/7 to be successful. And you have to have a predictable baby. So, it CAN work for some, but it's not feasible for most people anyway. If you WANT to do this though - go ahead - the environment will thank you - just keep it in your house TYVM.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
31. We did this. Elimination communication works as advertised.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:31 AM
Sep 2013

On our daughters fifth day of life, she peed in a bowl. We never looked back. While we did use a few disposable diapers for when we might be in a place where getting to to go would be inappropriate, and we did use reusable pre-fold diapers at night, we changed very few dirty diapers for her first two years. When she was 25 months old we took the plunge and removed the diapers altogether and she has been using a toilet ever since.

Watching your child for the cues they give when they new to go an responding to those cues is the key.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
33. There is a middle ground. The Thais use significantly fewer diapers.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:37 AM
Sep 2013


From a younger age they will keep diapers on at night but significantly reduce the hours during the day.

If there is an accident the floors are wooden or tile and easily cleaned.

Part of it is based on the past where almost no diapers were used and some on the searing heat that makes them uncomfortable.

The result is that Thai children are potty trained months and months before Americans although the actual process takes longer.

Our daughter stopped wearing diapers during the day on her first birthday.

Thais who see visitors walking around with kids 3,4, and even 5 wearing diapers will stare in amazement.

I am guessing that the prolonged use of diapers in the US is based in part on heavy advertising from commercial interests who want to see the longest possible term for diaper wearing and that the amount of diapers could be reduced by 60-70% if we wanted to.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
38. My sons were potty trained when they were 11 months old.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:44 AM
Sep 2013

I just don't think that this no diapers thing would work for families where both parents have to work.

I can't believe that there are kids 3+ that still wear diapers.

deurbano

(2,894 posts)
68. You're dead on about the commercial interests.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:54 PM
Sep 2013

I remember when my son was young, there was a commercial with Dr. Brazelton about how parents shouldn't "rush" toilet training. I liked that doc, and given his other parenting tips, I'm sure he honestly held that point of view, but his advice was featured within the context of a Pampers commercial! (I believe it was introducing a larger sized pamper for bigger toddlers.)

I think the way Thai children are raised is probably similar to other less Westernized/wealthy countries. I saw toddlers in China squatting on the street. My younger daughter was born in Vietnam, but I didn't notice how the Vietnamese coped with that particular issue. All I know is that in an oppressively hot (for me, coming from San Francisco, anyway!) environment, with high, high humidity, the custom was to wrap young babies (my daughter was only six months old) up like they were in Antarctica when going "outside"! (Outside is in quotes because the orphanage was kind of "open air," anyway.) I have to say she immediately seemed to prefer wearing much less clothing, back in our hotel room with the AC blasting. (I rationalized that I needed to prepare her for her new environment in SF!)

At any rate, I think my son, my younger daughter, my own interests and the environment would have been better served by foregoing Dr. Brazelton's advice in that area.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
91. Interesting
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 02:14 PM
Sep 2013


BTW if your daughter was born in Vietnam and left on a visa she probably left on the ODP (Orderly Departure Programme)

I started that programme working for the IOM in November 1989.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
100. And another is to use significantly MORE diapers, cloth diapers without a waterproof cover.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:25 PM
Sep 2013

My mother says that because she used cloth, she knew the second I was wet and she changed me immediately. Supposedly this meant that I never got used to wet or dirty diapers, and supposedly this is why I was "trained" at about a year old.

Or maybe my mother was just really well trained!

I didn't use her method, though. I just waited till for some warm weather when my kids were around two, explained about the potty and let them run around without any pants or diapers on. It took just one or two accidents before they got the idea.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
114. That is the clue, check and change immediately. My 4 were trained at 1-1/2
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:15 PM
Sep 2013

It was no big deal.

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
35. What do you do? Housebreak them like a dog?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:39 AM
Sep 2013

This is stupid and disgusting. Think of the germs with urine and fecal matter all over the house in open bowls. yuk!

Teaching a child to urinate in the street? It's crazy town!

MineralMan

(146,287 posts)
41. No idea. I suspect that the women doing this
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:48 AM
Sep 2013

don't work. Otherwise, I can't see how it would be possible. How it would be desirable, I don't know, either.

My mother said that I was completely toilet trained by 15 months. Since I was walking everywhere at 12 months, and talking a blue streak, she tells me that she talked me through toilet training, explaining it to me. Apparently, I caught on quickly.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
48. I can just see these kids running around shitting all over everything.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:55 AM
Sep 2013

Who would take the job of watching these kids? Probably the wrong kind of person.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
80. A common misconception held by those that do not understand this method.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:40 PM
Sep 2013

It's not magic. It's not new-age nonsense. It's not naked kids running around pissing and shitting themselves.

It's the opposite of all of that.

murielm99

(30,733 posts)
49. This is ridiculous.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 11:56 AM
Sep 2013

We used cloth diapers, even though they were hard to find. The disposables were saved for travel and similar situations.

I found that my babies got more diaper rash with disposables. But everyone has to use common sense. This lacks common sense. It is lacking in courtesy to others, too.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,406 posts)
57. I know that there is a certain school of thought about doing this during potty training
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 12:15 PM
Sep 2013

but it makes no sense for infants and children nowhere near ready for potty training not to mention being EXTREMELY unrealistic!

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
82. Except that none of that is true at all.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:42 PM
Sep 2013

We started on day 5 of our child's life and worked as advertised. YMMV.

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
78. As long as one has a fenced yard that can be child-proofed...
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:32 PM
Sep 2013

it can be done.
Just let the baby run ( or crawl or roll - depending on age) free in the back yard!
An adult (or sibling, perhaps) can move the poop to a specific area when they go out to feed the child.
It would probably be best to bring the child in at night, though.
Maybe put the child in a room with newspaper on the floor? I haven't thought that part out yet.

Oh...in cold weather...I'll have to think about that one, too...
maybe this isn't a good idea.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
83. This is what humans have been doing for eternity until diaper companies came along.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:44 PM
Sep 2013

This is how most of the worlds population does it. It's not new, it's old, and it works. What's dumb is paying thousands of dollars for disposable diapers that clog landfills ad harm the environment.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
85. If you are a Digo in Africa
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:50 PM
Sep 2013

you have different child rearing practices that make perfect sense in your environment and culture. In NYC this is dumb. Sorry, its my opinion.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
90. You can have your opinion, but it seems to come from ignorance not knowledge.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 02:11 PM
Sep 2013

You seem to actually understand very little about what Elimination Communication really is about. Perhaps if you really understood the concept your opinion would be different.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
125. Just to be clear, I'm not calling you ignorant, just your opinion on this subject.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 06:51 PM
Sep 2013

And it really just comes down to personal and responsible choices. YMMV

Peace to you as well.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,868 posts)
106. Older isn't always better.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:46 PM
Sep 2013

People did lots of things until sanitation practices became better. I would be interested to know the rates of disease and infection in the majority of countries that still practice this.

lumpy

(13,704 posts)
117. We like to think that we have advanced from using Mother Natures methods of waste control.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:20 PM
Sep 2013

I advocate for cloth diapers if they are not affordable. Doubt if the US is going to go for the bare bottom method.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
119. Don't discount Mother Nature. She has been at this much longer that we have.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:23 PM
Sep 2013

You may be surprised to find how much more sanitary it is to void one's self into a receptacle and not into a diaper where it's smeared all over the skin and such.

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
84. Way back in the Dark Ages
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 01:45 PM
Sep 2013

Back in the late 1950' and early 60's, I used cloth diapers. Disposable were available but were expensive and really bad, couldn't hold the urine. I only used them when we traveled. I would not start to potty train my kids until they were waking up dry in the mornings. What you did then was put them in the little cotton training pants. The reason was that when they did have accident, it would be unpleasant for them and therefore make it easier to get them to use the potty. it worked very well for my 3 kids, it usually took 2 or 3 week to train them. My daughters did this for their kids as well and now the little cotton training panties have cute designs printed on them and the kids love to wear them. I can't image a 4 year old wear those disposable pants.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
88. My mom bought us cloth diaper service for our kids...
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 02:00 PM
Sep 2013

... it wasn't something we could afford ourselves.

My wife or I, one or the other, was always home. We let the kids run around naked in the back yard a lot.

I was changing diapers when I was ten years old. That kind of experience will make a teenager pay a whole lot of attention to that birth control stuff...

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
89. Uh...how exactly do you do this unless you never leave your child alone?
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 02:02 PM
Sep 2013

Or with someone else?

I mean, seriously, what a goddamn mess.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
118. That's the point.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:22 PM
Sep 2013

You can't.

The entire point of this is to show off how much you don't work for a living and how much more you devote your life to your child. It's a way for some parents to "one-up" other parents.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
105. If people lived in nature where baby waste could just be absorbed into the earth...
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:41 PM
Sep 2013

and then the little one could be dunked in a river afterwards, would be great.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
116. maybe if I was rentijg or living in a home
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

I didn't give two shots about.


Glad those years are behind me...

lynne

(3,118 posts)
123. Well, Mom gets trained -
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 06:20 PM
Sep 2013

- and that's about it. Mom is turned into an excrement look-out station and, of course, will soon be able to identify when the baby needs to poo/pee. Most all mothers do the same thing except they know it will soon be time to change a diaper and not to go grabbing a cereal bowl for catching. Ewwww . . .

Seems to me that Mom is going to be with the child 24/7 until it's potty trained. I know I wouldn't babysit in that situation!

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
124. I let my kids go diaperless much of the time when they were potty training,
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 06:24 PM
Sep 2013

i.e., at around 18 mos.-2 years, for everyone's convenience, but I can't imagine doing it any earlier than that.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
128. I have a new agey friend who did this and just HELL NO
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 07:23 PM
Sep 2013

Eight of us were out at brunch and her daughter stood on a chair in the restaurant and peed all over the place.

I was flabbergasted and everybody else was like "no biggie" (or maybe too embarrassed to say anything).

It was fucking DISGUSTING and ruined my meal.

Hell. No.

Fucking hippies. Grrr.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
132. What your friends child did is NOT Elimination Communication at all.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 08:45 PM
Sep 2013

I'm not sure what that was, but EC it was not.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
133. This is the wheel.
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 08:46 PM
Sep 2013

This is how humans have done this for all of time before diapers came along. Its how most of the rest of the world still does it.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
134. The world also used smoke signals
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 09:13 PM
Sep 2013

And I'm betting those fine folks who crossed the Bering strait and then later built the penthouse on top of Peru probably had their babies wrapped up in something.

And definitely for the first family with four walls and roof which I think was way back in the realm of "all time"

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On the Subject of Diapers...