Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 04:42 PM Sep 2013

Peace with Iran or War with Syria?

That is the question today, after the exchange of letters among the presidents of Iran and the U.S.

We should all be impressed positively with Obama if he answers for peace, given the pressure to go ahead and bomb Syria (and to ignore the Iranian peace overture) from the pro-war neocon and humanitarian imperialist factions of the military-industrial complex. The disturbing thing is that the two former defense secretaries who just slammed Obama for not having bombed Syria yet - the Bush mob's Iran-Contra gangster Robert Gates and the Clintonista Leon Panetta - both ran the Pentagon under the present administration as the president's own choices.

I'm sure most of us will agree these are not issues for "triangulation."

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Peace with Iran or War with Syria? (Original Post) JackRiddler Sep 2013 OP
Tri-An-Goo-Lay-Shun kick JackRiddler Sep 2013 #1
I guess nobody agrees! JackRiddler Sep 2013 #2
Sorry just got here, yes. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2013 #3
Danke. JackRiddler Sep 2013 #4
Sie sind willkommen nt Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2013 #5
Almost final kick. JackRiddler Sep 2013 #6
And final kick for 3 more readers... JackRiddler Sep 2013 #7
"Humanitarian imperialists." That has a nice ring to it. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #8
Thanks, but not my coinage. JackRiddler Sep 2013 #10
Disturbing that they said that now - when it looks like karynnj Sep 2013 #9
We can only have one or the other? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2013 #11
Actually, in this case, yes. JackRiddler Sep 2013 #12
If Obama manages to thread this needle, I will be very impressed. riderinthestorm Sep 2013 #13

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
9. Disturbing that they said that now - when it looks like
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 02:37 PM
Sep 2013

there is a good chance to get rid of the chemical weapons and a fair chance that they could then go to a negotiated political solution.

It does show how strong the pressures on Obama to attack are. I was not happy that Obama in his speech today favored the Syria resolution backed by a military threat - rather than what Kerry and Lavrov negotiated.

Interesting that he listened to Powers, who has never negotiated anything, to state before the world that a resolution without the treat is useless - when it is clear that Russia will not support it.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
13. If Obama manages to thread this needle, I will be very impressed.
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 10:43 PM
Sep 2013

And I may actually become a convert to his version of 11th dimensional chess... (or whatever it is he "plays&quot .

Its still possible he can pull it off. If he does, then his Nobel Peace Prize will have (finally) been truly awarded. I fervently hope there's other discussions happening off camera.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Peace with Iran or War wi...