General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is NOT a Democracy it's a Republic
Last edited Thu Sep 19, 2013, 08:13 PM - Edit history (1)
Congressman Doug Collins of Georgia??
Al Sharpton to Collins: I'll send you a tape of you saying that to play for your people back home
Here's the whole segment which should make more sense
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)dictionary and read up on what "Republic" means.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)They're proud of the willful ignorance.
Graybeard
(6,996 posts)I like that Sharpton has RWers on his show. He exposes them as frauds and then they say insane things that Rev Al calls them on immediately.
.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Watch the heads explode.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)We the People. That means democracy. Not that there is a necessary contradiction between the concept of democracy and that of a republic. Not that either has ever really existed in unconditional form.
The people are mentioned eight times in the US constitution, I believe, and a republic only twice.
However, the "Republic" fanatics do highlight an important reality: The 55 Federalists of 1787 wrote their Constitution with the intent of rolling back the more democratic system that had already existed under the Continental Congress since 1774. They were the ruling class of the time, and wanted to keep themselves in power. Thus the separately elected president as commander in chief, a Senate, an Electoral College, lifetime appointments to the high court, 3/5 clause and protection of slavery, ability of states to determine who is allowed to vote, and other anti-democratic features. And the democratic forces of the time resisted this plan, and at least forced the passage of a Bill of Rights. I call them the Founding People, and would have stood with them and not the Framers. Assuming of course I was even among the white males of the time, and had any say in the matter.
Republicans unfortunately have an ugly point about the Constitution of 1787. Luckily, it was open enough to allow some evolution of the democracy since then. But since the 1980s it's been going backward.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Who came from a far more aristocratic society than the Northern states who wanted a more democratic model.
I suspect this will be of interest to you
Oops forgot link
http://www.amazon.com/American-Nations-History-Regional-Cultures/dp/0143122029
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)At least, as opposed to the South.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Read a few academic articles on this. He does a good job.
I know you like to read
SamKnause
(13,101 posts)The facts show that the U.S. is neither a Democracy, or Republic.
The U.S. is an OLIGARCHY !!!!
The coup is almost complete.
kentuck
(111,080 posts)In reality, it is something else entirely.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)with occasional outbreaks of People Power. Man, do we need one today.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,409 posts)and what point are the people saying trying to make exactly? I don't get it.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I remember seeing a bumper sticker back in the late '60s that said "This is a REPUBLIC, NOT a democracy. Let's keep it that way!" People who believed like that were called "birchers" back then.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,409 posts)but what exactly is supposed to be the message?
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)It didn't make any sense to me then, it doesn't make any sense to me now
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,409 posts)I can only guess that they are using it to suggest that us peons somehow don't count and that THEY are (or will be) the ones making the decisions for the rest of us and that if we don't like we should just STFU. That's the only theory I have.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)What makes me scratch my head is that that bumper sticker was attached to a beat-up station wagon that was parked at a low-rent duplex, so I'm pretty sure the owner wasn't among the decision-making elite.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,409 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 20, 2013, 08:38 AM - Edit history (1)
somehow
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Or worse, democracy equals "Democrat Party."
So when someone says, "It's a republic, not a democracy," it's an easy way for that (RW) person to "win" by claiming superiority.
What I have encountered is that the people who say that are morons. Ask them how the US differs from the republic of Iran, or the Congo, or the People's Republic of North Korea.
But, Benghazi!
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... roughly speaking.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The republic=representative democracy idea came from Madison.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... roughly speaking, though, when reactionaries say this is a Republic, yes, it's not a monarchy, and then they can hear it from their hero that a Republic is essentially a representative democracy.
Then I can say, in my Ben Franklin accent, that we couldn't keep it!
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Representative government with democratic elections.
Democracy is 51% rules, which could have no reserved rights for the minority.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Hence, the "roughly" in my post.
earthside
(6,960 posts)That's the problem with a 'republic'.
The PRC is certainly a 'republic' ... however, there is only one party so only Communist Party members can ever be elected to government office; they do have elections in 'Red' China so it is a 'republic'.
So, the two terms are not exclusive of one another as some right-wingers would have us believe.
You can have a 'republic' that is an elected dictatorship because sovereignty is held by one party or one clique of powerful people -- not a democracy.
Or you can have a genuine 'democratic republic' where the sovereignty resides with all of the people.
I think that theoretically, as we were all taught in eighth grade civics, the USA is a democratic republic.
Whenever I hear this "we are a republic, not a democracy' line come-up, I know immediately that I'm dealing with a John Bircher or some other sundry right-wing fanatic.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)My point was that they are not mutually exclusive, and that while they can take separate forms, as it applies to the United States, we are essentially a representative democracy, or Republic (and as grantcart stated, more specifically, a constitutional Republic to preserve rights for the minority.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)nt
no_hypocrisy
(46,086 posts)The purpose of a Constitutional Republic is to place limits on the tyranny of the majority.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Constitutional_Republic
malaise
(268,951 posts)What an awful human being.
I'd have shut him up much earlier
gopiscrap
(23,757 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)Some words are beloved by debaters, deniers, and equivocators. Equivocation, for the naive, is taking advantage of a word with multiple definitions for rhetorical advantage.
In this case, it's something like:
republic; n.
- any government that's not a monarchy, as in Soviet, Chinese, French, etc.
- a representative democracy, as opposed to a direct democracy
Most right wingers like to deny the democratic aspects of this country.
--imm
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)It's like claiming an animal isn't dog because it's a Chihuahua. This is what happens when stupid people try to play lawyer and parse language.