General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy Name Is Jason, I’m A 35-Yr-Old White Male Combat Veteran…And I’m On Food Stamps
--snip--
Oh, and Im now on food stamps. Since June, as a matter of fact.
Why am I on food stamps?
The same reason everyone on food stamps is on food stamps: because I would very much enjoy not starving.
I mean, if thats okay with you:
Mr. or Mrs. Republican congressman.
Mr. or Mrs. Conservative commentator.
Mr. or Mrs. welfare queen letter-to-the-editor author.
Mr. or Mrs. fiscal conservative, reason-based libertarian.
I do apologize for burdening you on the checkout line with real-life images of American-style poverty. I know you probably believe the only true starving people in the world have flies buzzing around their eyes while they wallow away, near-lifeless in gutters.
Hate to burst the bubble, but those people dont live in this country.
I do. And millions like me. Millions of people in poverty who fall into three categories.
Lets call them the lucky category, since conservatives seem to think people on welfare have hit some sort of jackpot:
Those living paycheck to paycheck? Theyre a little lucky.
Those living unemployment check to unemployment check? Theyre a little luckier.
Those living 2nd of the month to 2nd of the month? *ding* Weve hit the jackpot!
The 2nd of the month being the time when funds gets electronically deposited onto the EBT card, [at least in NY] for those whove never been fortunate enough to hit that $175/month Powerball.
I fall into the latter two categories. But Ive known people recently - soldiers in the Army who were in the first and third. They were off fighting in Afghanistan while their wives were at home, buying food at the on-post commissary with food stamps.
And nobody bats an eye there, because its not uncommon in the military.
Its not uncommon nor is it shameful. It might be shameful how little service-members are paid, but thats a separate issue.
The fact remains anyone at a certain income level can find it difficult from time to time to pay for everything. And when youre poor you learn to make sacrifices. Food shouldnt be one of them.
The whole concept is un-American. People living here, in the greatest country on Earth, with the most abundant resources, should be forced to go hungry because of the intellectual notion of fiscal conservatism and the ideological notion of self-reliance.
Are you fucking kidding me?
I didnt risk my life in Afghanistan so I could come back and watch people go hungry in America. I certainly didnt risk it so *I* could come back and go hungry.
http://thesterlingroad.com/2013/09/19/my-name-is-jason-im-a-35-yr-old-white-male-combat-veteran-and-im-on-food-stamps/
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...."self reliance for SOME"
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Um, no.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Infrastructure is essentially a form of aid to the states as it creates jobs which in turn allows people to be able to pay bills and buy things.
BrainMann1
(460 posts)and by the way I hope you don't lose your job. But then that would make it your business.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)I've been retired for almost six years; no job to lose.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)The Veterans Job Bill was defeated by Conservatives as the last planeloads of soldiers from Afghanistan were arriving at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport in Texas. I was watching a noon news report on ABC Dallas-Fort Worth give a story with video. I waited for the REST of the story, how Texas Senators Cornyn and Hutchinson voted against the Veteran's Job Bill. The story was not given, so I emailed the TV station. They were too cowardly to reply back, or contact me.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/09/19/13966931-senate-republicans-kill-veterans-jobs-bill?lite
G_j
(40,366 posts)and disheartening that the media helped slip it under the radar.
Raster
(20,998 posts)NO ONE, NO ONE, NO ONE should go hungry in this land of plenty. NO ONE. And especially not someone who risked their life for this country.
Thank you for posting. Bless your heart.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)Fighting World hunger should began at home
gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)they can seem to fathom that their ideological bullshit affects real people.
Kablooie
(18,612 posts)They can vote any crazy law at all to please the teapeople but everyone knows it would never pass the Senate and President.
If it had a chance of actually being made law I'll bet it wouldn't have passed the House because a lot of semi-sane Republicans would have voted against it.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Obama has said he will veto the budget if the massive cuts in this program are voted through. The GOP wants to destroy ALL social programs, furlough all workers and bankrupt the country.
People had better put their congress critturs on notice this will not go unpunished. As Obama said, why does anyone vote for unnecessary suffering?
They would break the budget so they can nullify health care, make people so desperate they will give up rights to fair treatment and work for room and board, in the so-called name of freedom and liberty?
Obviously, the libertarian vision of freedom and liberty is only for the wealthy few.
Uncle Joe
(58,297 posts)Thanks for sharing your story, Jason.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Why would you ever leave the military while the country is in such terrible economic shape. A bad economy (blamed on Obama), no jobs for the foreseeable future, millions leaving the workforce and not being counted on the unemployment roles so the 7 percent number doesn't sound so terrible when it fact it is near 15 percent unemployment, if you count all those that have left the workforce.
So you got out of the military and now you will fester until a republican president gets elected, ends Obamacare, cuts taxes for the rich and creates millions of jobs...
Why don't you go back in the miliatry and earn your keep... instead of sucking off of taxpayers..?
That's what I work with, retired military contractors...
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)I think you forgot the sarcasm deal.
If you arent being sarcastic, then you are in the wrong place.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Response to WooWooWoo (Original post)
Post removed
G_j
(40,366 posts)unpleasant little presentation. And you know this person..how?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Maybe you forgot the sarcasm thingie.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Heroin covers up the smell of napalm and burned flesh. He said it to me in Minot ND in 1977, years later I heard he passed away in the winter.
You seem to have a lot of anger and resentment. I hope you learn to relax.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)What a load of hateful garbage.
hunter
(38,303 posts)I mean you'd trade place with your sister in a second, right?
Maybe take on whatever mental illness or addiction that's holding her down in exchange for food stamps and a life of leisure, right?
With pets! With a cell phone! OMG, the wealth she enjoys!!!
No??? You wouldn't trade?
Why not?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Just to tease out one little part:
Guess what's the cheapest way to buy telephone service? A cell phone. Landlines cost more than the cheapest cell phone options.
People complaining about the poor having cell phones are still living in the world where they got a cell phone as a luxury 20+ years ago and assume it's still a luxury.
Daniel537
(1,560 posts)Because this hero has more of each in one finger nail than you do in your mindless head.
LostOne4Ever
(9,286 posts)We have got to stop the republicans from starving poor people.
These people are evil!
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)During one of my father's tours in Viet Nam, mom and us boys lived in Lehigh Acres Fla. near her parents. We would travel the width of Fla twice a month to shop at the Homestead AFB commissary. I remember her dieting regularly even though she was not fat. I never thought about it until I watched the married guys on the ship scrimp and save to keep their families fed.
I never asked, being scared of her possible answer.
dotymed
(5,610 posts)todays commissaries are more expensive (no taxes though) than average supermarkets.
The quality seems to be much better as does the selection of goods...
When I was young (Army Brat) the commissaries were much less expensive.
With the current profiteering by govt. contractors, greed is the motivating factor.
When our military provided it's own food (purchased through a bidding process), cooked the meals for it's members, built their own buildings, etc.. costs were much more equitable.
Military contracting (cost plus) has made many profiteers very wealthy.
In their services they tend to sub-contract, very many times, each "sub" making a very good profit without doing anything but finding a cheaper sub-contractor.
The original contractors usually realize much more profit.
They sub-contract each contract (usually about a half dozen times) and the company that actually provides the service is motivated to hire unskilled labor, pay them shit, the work is unsafe, but they can at least, realize some profits (compared to the contractor) by employing the Wal-Mart type of workers.
When they contracted and employed Union workers (who earned a living wage and are very well trained), they could still make a profit (not as huge) but they had quality services at a lower price to taxpayers. The workers spent money in the economy also.
It has been a race to the bottom in the govt. contracted building and services scam.
I have watched this over the decades and it is a scale model of how our economy has deteriorated.
Yet the wealthy have gotten wealthier and the people, much more poor.
Much like the way we were taught that the USSR ran it's economy.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)again, it's the destroyer of souls.
sammytko
(2,480 posts)Their goal is to sell items at cost plus 5%.
You are supposed to tip the baggers, but they do an awesome job. The LINE to the registers moves quickly. I wish all stores would implement this system.
Hope this guy has started his VA application for disabled vet pension. And he can also use his 911 GI bill and go to school while drawing a stipend of at least 1400 a month. All tuition and books are covered.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:40 PM - Edit history (1)
has a history of shamefully treating it's soldiers and veterans of wars and 'conflicts' in which they had prosecuted at the behest of 'knowledgeable' leaders. Treated both shamefully and with disrespect. Recently from Rumsfeld sending thousands of troops into harms way WITHOUT proper equipment to that goddamn shrub 'flying' onto the "mission accomplished" flight deck attired in that goddamn leather flying jacket to using depleted uranium in munitions without telling troops we have been treating our soldiers like so much chattel to be treated with disdain and dishonor. The fact that this vet has to write something like this is the end for me. America, you stink! American leaders, you stink. American people don't let this despicable treatment of our vets continue. Show some righteous anger!
Stargazer99
(2,576 posts)in their place. Spiritually sick country...due to excessive wealth for some....just exactly what this country was first established to controll....the king and corporations in England when our country was born.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)It's just a catchphrase now. Apparently that's all it takes to support the troops. That way you don't have to actually DO anything.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Saw this after Viet-Nam it really took hold with Reagan and his Welfare Queen tirade
llmart
(15,533 posts)can see the truth in your statement. When my middle-aged children ask me "was it always like this" I tell them, "No, it all started going downhill when Reagan was elected. That's when the emphasis on greed and the "I've got mine" mentality started.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Just does not compute for them. If you are a "troop" there is no way you'd end up on food stamps. They'd probably deflect.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)We were useful to them when we could be sent off to fight whatever war their bloodthirsty campaign donors wanted, and then when our usefulness ran its course, they kick us to the curb.
See the SNAFU that is the 21st century VA if you need further proof of how our elected officials feel about veterans.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)not vicious brigands but 'our bipartisan partners'. The Republicans have great allies among the 'centrists' in the Democratic Party, the Third Way is practically a Republican outreach group. And they hold the poor in great contempt.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)rivegauche
(601 posts)There is something rotten and evil in the Republican soul (if they even have one) that they would take food out of the mouths of the MOST needy people in our country. God damn them.
I have a dear friend, a 60 year-old man who has worked all his life. He lost his job (company takeover) over a year ago thru no fault of his own. He was on unemployment until it ran out, and now he is on food stamps. He barely gets by. Getting hired as a 60-year-old is next to fucking impossible although he tries as hard as he can. I don't know ho wpeopl elike him, decent hardworking peopel in a tough place, are going to survive the Republican fatwa against poor people. I'm so angry I could eat nails.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)People at this age should be eligible for social security and medicare. This would thin out the workforce so that the number of people seeking jobs is less and therefore it should make it easier for these younger folks to find employment. I believe this would save us money in the long run because fewer people needing resources (assuming the jobs they find aren't minimum wage ones that is). How would we pay for the extra people on social security, you ask? we could always raise the cap collecting from more than just the first $110,000 (is that what the amount is?) but we wouldn't want those making more to have to pay on more. I
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)That older people have to struggle so much when there is a simple solution: lower the age for SS eligibility. Since age discrimination is real, especially in a struggling economy, it just makes way too much sense.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)I hope your post will awaken those who do not think that the GOP is the greatest enemy of our country has ever faced!
WoodyD
(215 posts)People living here, in the greatest country on Earth, with the most abundant resources, should be forced to go hungry because of the intellectual notion of fiscal conservatism and the ideological notion of self-reliance.
Are you fucking kidding me?
is amen, sir.
DreamSmoker
(841 posts)stonecutter357
(12,694 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Odd that it was included.
WooWooWoo
(454 posts)because the stereotype of people on welfare is generally female POC.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I actually didn't realize that was the stereotype.
WooWooWoo
(454 posts)mnmoderatedem
(3,722 posts)except for when they don't
golfguru
(4,987 posts)from Univ of Washington...pretty good University.
Actually it is ranked 27th best in the entire world.
Not one of them have found a job in their field of study.
Some are working as waitresses. My daughter signed up
on a project to teach English in Spain. She will get paid
a stipend, 750 euro's/month, barely enough to live on.
There are no jobs in US! Economy sucks!
Response to golfguru (Reply #52)
Name removed Message auto-removed
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)At age 55 if my fucked government would lower the age for SS. Let the younger people work...I am tired.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)WooWooWoo
(454 posts)and btw, yes, that was me on Chris Hayes' show tonight.
well, my photo anyway.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)I didn't realize that was you until now, WooWooWoo. Thanks for serving, and for speaking out.
WooWooWoo
(454 posts)i'm glad the story got out and it seems to have really touched people - I think it's been shared hundreds of thousands of times and the supportive comments have been amazing.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)We need to be paying our soldiers more instead of making them rely on public assistance.