General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA comment I posted to the NY Times editorial, "The March to Anarchy"
This is the text of a comment I posted last night to a very good New York Times editorial, "The March to Anarcy". The comment seems to have struck quite a chord with many readers, so I thought I would share it here.
[font color="gray"]New York, NY[/font]
If the GOP insists on an economic civil war, then I sincerely hope President Obama gives it to them. The notion that a faction within a party that controls only one house of Congress -- and that only by virtue of gerrymandering -- has a right to dictate policy or legislation, when it hasn't been able to be sufficiently successful at the polls to enable it to pass its agenda through legitimate legislative means, by repeatedly engaging in blackmail and extortion, MUST be stopped, whatever the cost. Republicans seem to be under the very mistaken idea that elections only have consequences when Republicans prevail, and that they, and they alone, are entitled to govern. That is in direct conflict with the system of government our founders created. And no, the claim that "both sides have engaged in this sort of thing" is not valid. Sure, both parties have, in the past, engaged in targeted resistance to particular pieces of legislation, or to a particular nominee. But at no other point in this country's history has an opposition party engaged in such total, across-the-board obstruction, nor tried to force its agenda by extorting the country with the threat of deliberately wrecking the nation's economy if they didn't get their way. That dubious distinction goes solely to today's Republican Party. It is nothing less than economic terrorism, and the President should deal with it the way the U.S. government officially deals with terrorists of any kind: by refusing to negotiate.
Sept. 19, 2013 at 7:16 a.m.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)refusing to negotiate with terrorists. We do it all the time....
On second thought I see you said "officially" so, nevermind!
kentuck
(111,079 posts)Thanks!
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)Cheers!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)The Magistrate
(95,244 posts)Well said indeed.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)That's their sole mission, to destroy the USA in order to "save" it.
mick063
(2,424 posts)Japan was utterly destroyed. Whether it was right or wrong, it allowed General MacArthur to shape it's current political structure to our collective will.
This modern US dilemma is the work of the 1%. They cannot impose complete and total plutocracy without destroying the last vestiges of representative Democracy.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Great sentiment and excellent writing.
I once took a writing class from a woman who's written in both the Times and the Boston Globe. She said the the letters in the Times were written better than features in the Globe.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)bearssoapbox
(1,408 posts)He needs to quit screwing around with them.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Thanks for representin'.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)rec