Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 11:13 AM Sep 2013

a new Glass-Steagall...the petition

http://my.elizabethwarren.com/page/s/21stcenturyglasssteagall?source=20130918em

Congress passed the Glass Steagall Act in 1933 to separate risky investment banking from ordinary commercial banking. And for half a century, the banking system was stable and our middle class grew stronger.

But in the 1980s, the federal regulators started reinterpreting the laws to break down the divide between regular banking and Wall Street risk-taking, and in 1999, Congress repealed Glass Steagall altogether. Wall Street had spent 66 years and millions of dollars lobbying for repeal, and, eventually, the big banks won.

Our new 21st Century Glass Steagall Act once again separates traditional banks from riskier financial services. And since banking has become much more complicated since the first bill was written in 1933, we’ve updated the law to include new activities and leave no room for regulatory interpretations that water down the rules.

The bill will give a five year transition period for financial institutions to split their business practices into distinct entities – shrinking their size, taking an important step toward ending “Too Big to Fail” once and for all, and minimizing the risk of future bailouts.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
a new Glass-Steagall...the petition (Original Post) magical thyme Sep 2013 OP
k&r tk2kewl Sep 2013 #1
Done. Thanks for posting this. hedda_foil Sep 2013 #2
Done! and Rec BlueToTheBone Sep 2013 #3
Five years, huh? RC Sep 2013 #4
Why were none of the banks that blew up banks that had been previously regulated by Glass-Steagall? Recursion Sep 2013 #5
Exactly. DURHAM D Sep 2013 #8
Done. nt sufrommich Sep 2013 #6
I think it's a great bill, but will get small support from our corporate minded Dem congress and... dmosh42 Sep 2013 #7
On it. nt bluedeathray Sep 2013 #9

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
5. Why were none of the banks that blew up banks that had been previously regulated by Glass-Steagall?
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 11:52 AM
Sep 2013

And what about the fact that it was the repeal of Glass-Steagall that let Bank of America and Wells Fargo step in and stop the bleeding of the investment banks?

Glass-Steagall prevented investment banks from operating retail accounts, and retail banks from operating proprietary desks.

None of the investment banks even opened retail accounts after the repeal, and none of the retail banks who opened proprietary desks imploded.

What good would a return to Glass-Steagall do? I have to agree with Barney Frank that the repeal of Glass-Steagall wasn't the problem.

dmosh42

(2,217 posts)
7. I think it's a great bill, but will get small support from our corporate minded Dem congress and...
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 11:59 AM
Sep 2013

forget about the ass-kissing Repubs. They only serve the rich, period.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»a new Glass-Steagall...th...