Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHenry Kissinger, genocide and the founding of Bangladesh
The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger and a Forgotten Genocide. By Gary Bass. Knopf; 499 pages; $30...
The split into Pakistan and Bangladesh was perhaps inevitable. It began in late 1970, after Pakistans first national elections. To the shock of West Pakistanis, an easterner, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, won a sweeping victory, and was poised to lead the country. His Awami League wanted greater rights for Bengalis. But the army chiefs and politicians in Islamabad would not countenance his taking office. They arrested him and the army began repressing eastern protesters.
Bengalis flocked to join the rebel forces who were fighting for independence. West Pakistani soldiers stationed in the east, plus a few local supporters, began targeting students, writers, politicians; especially the Hindu minority. Soldiers massacred civilians, burned villages and sent millions fleeing to India. Eventually some 10m became refugees, mostly Hindus. At least 300,000 people were killed; some say the death toll was over 1m.
Seen from America, where Richard Nixon was president, the war was a domestic Pakistani affair. Indias leader, Indira Gandhi, claimed otherwise. She called the floods of refugees a humanitarian disaster that threatened regional stability. She wanted international action, demanding that America tell Pakistans leaders to stop the killing. Nixon, urged by his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, refused.
In The Blood Telegram Gary Bass, a Princeton academic (who once wrote for The Economist), sets out to assess Americas handling of the war. He argues that the killings amounted to a genocide: Hindus, as a distinct minority, were chosen for annihilation and expulsion. He asks why Nixon continued actively to support the Pakistani leaders who were behind it.
At the behest of Mr Kissinger, Nixon sent military planes and other materiel to Pakistan, even though he knew this broke American law. He deployed an American naval task force to the Bay of Bengal to intimidate India, which had begun helping rebels in East Pakistan. Most extreme, he secretly asked China to send troops to Indias borders. He did so accepting a risk of Soviet retaliation, even that nuclear bombs might be lobbed around in response.
...
Ultimately, Mr Kissinger did much to set Americas course. He argued that America should pay no heed to domestic horrors in Pakistan, saying you cant go to war over refugees, and warned that India was a greater threat to international order. Indian bastards, he agreed with Nixon, needed a mass famine to cut them down to size.
The split into Pakistan and Bangladesh was perhaps inevitable. It began in late 1970, after Pakistans first national elections. To the shock of West Pakistanis, an easterner, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, won a sweeping victory, and was poised to lead the country. His Awami League wanted greater rights for Bengalis. But the army chiefs and politicians in Islamabad would not countenance his taking office. They arrested him and the army began repressing eastern protesters.
Bengalis flocked to join the rebel forces who were fighting for independence. West Pakistani soldiers stationed in the east, plus a few local supporters, began targeting students, writers, politicians; especially the Hindu minority. Soldiers massacred civilians, burned villages and sent millions fleeing to India. Eventually some 10m became refugees, mostly Hindus. At least 300,000 people were killed; some say the death toll was over 1m.
Seen from America, where Richard Nixon was president, the war was a domestic Pakistani affair. Indias leader, Indira Gandhi, claimed otherwise. She called the floods of refugees a humanitarian disaster that threatened regional stability. She wanted international action, demanding that America tell Pakistans leaders to stop the killing. Nixon, urged by his national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, refused.
In The Blood Telegram Gary Bass, a Princeton academic (who once wrote for The Economist), sets out to assess Americas handling of the war. He argues that the killings amounted to a genocide: Hindus, as a distinct minority, were chosen for annihilation and expulsion. He asks why Nixon continued actively to support the Pakistani leaders who were behind it.
At the behest of Mr Kissinger, Nixon sent military planes and other materiel to Pakistan, even though he knew this broke American law. He deployed an American naval task force to the Bay of Bengal to intimidate India, which had begun helping rebels in East Pakistan. Most extreme, he secretly asked China to send troops to Indias borders. He did so accepting a risk of Soviet retaliation, even that nuclear bombs might be lobbed around in response.
...
Ultimately, Mr Kissinger did much to set Americas course. He argued that America should pay no heed to domestic horrors in Pakistan, saying you cant go to war over refugees, and warned that India was a greater threat to international order. Indian bastards, he agreed with Nixon, needed a mass famine to cut them down to size.
http://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21586514-new-history-sheds-fresh-light-shameful-moment-american-foreign-policy-blood
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1481 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Henry Kissinger, genocide and the founding of Bangladesh (Original Post)
FarCenter
Sep 2013
OP
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)1. Kissinger, he of the "useless eaters" quote..
Nixon was even willing to drop "the big one" on North Viet-Nam.
I have just finished one bio of Nixon, and find my feelings towards him during his Presidency were quite justified.
A bit easier to read about him now, due the distance of many years.
He and Kissinger, tho distrusting each other, made a hellish team built on paranoia and grandiosity.
pampango
(24,692 posts)2. Many read this and think of Syria. Kissinger wanted the US to stay out of a civil war and
"you cant go to war over refugees.
The Pakistan Army, in collusion with religious extremist militias (the Razakars, Al-Badr and Al-Shams), engaged in the systematic genocide and atrocities of Bengali civilians, particularly nationalists, intellectuals, youth and religious minorities.
It witnessed large-scale atrocities, the exodus of 10 million refugees and the displacement of 30 million people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War
It witnessed large-scale atrocities, the exodus of 10 million refugees and the displacement of 30 million people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War
At least this part of Kissinger's legacy might be popular today.
HeiressofBickworth
(2,682 posts)3. And this is H. Clinton's
valued friend and advisor!!!