Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,032 posts)
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 12:07 PM Sep 2013

The Fall of the Heritage Foundation and the Death of Republican Ideas

The Fall of the Heritage Foundation and the Death of Republican Ideas
How the Heritage Foundation went from the intellectual backbone of the conservative movement to the GOP's bane -- and how it's hurting the party's hopes for a turnaround
Molly Ball Sep 25 2013, 7:00 AM ET


During the 1980 election, an up-and-coming Washington think tank called the Heritage Foundation undertook a massive task: to examine the federal government from top to bottom and produce a detailed, practical conservative policy vision.

The result, called Mandate for Leadership, epitomized the intellectual ambition of the then-rising conservative movement. Its 20 volumes, totaling more than 3,000 pages, included such proposals as income-tax cuts, inner-city “enterprise zones,” a presidential line-item veto, and a new Air Force bomber.

Despite the publication's academic prose and mind-boggling level of detail, it caused a sensation. A condensed version -- still more than 1,000 pages -- became a paperback bestseller in Washington. The newly elected Ronald Reagan passed out copies at his first Cabinet meeting, and it quickly became his administration’s blueprint. By the end of Reagan’s first year in office, 60 percent of the Mandate’s 2,000 ideas were being implemented, and the Republican Party’s status as a hotbed of intellectual energy was ratified. It was a Democrat, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who would declare in 1981, “Of a sudden, the GOP has become a party of ideas.”

The story of the conservative movement that has come to dominate the Republican Party over the last four decades is inextricably intertwined with the story of the Heritage Foundation. In that time, it became more than just another think tank. It came to occupy a place of special privilege -- a quasi-official arm of GOP administrations and Congresses; a sponsor of scholarship and supplier of legislation; a policy base for the party when out of power. Heritage has shaped American public policy in major ways, from Reagan’s missile-defense initiative to Clinton’s welfare reform: Both originated as Heritage proposals. So, too, did the idea of a universal health-care system based on a mandate that individuals buy insurance. Though Heritage subsequently abandoned it, the individual mandate famously became the basis of health-care reforms proposed by Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama.

"They're destroying the reputation and credibility of the Heritage Foundation. The respect for their policy work has been greatly diminished."


These days, Heritage has a different crusade. The foundation’s president, the confrontational former Senator Jim DeMint, spent the last month touring the country, drawing cheering crowds as he demanded that Republican politicians insist that Obamacare be defunded -- and denouncing those who wouldn’t go along. “Republicans are afraid,” DeMint told NPR. “And if they are, they need to be replaced.” The foundation’s three-year-old activism arm, Heritage Action, spent half a million dollars on online ads targeting 100 Republican House members who didn’t sign on to the defund crusade (“Tell Representative Tom Cole to Stop Funding Obamacare”).

The push from Heritage helped the defund scheme gather momentum, forcing Republican leaders to pull their proposed funding bill and replace it with one the Senate has committed to block. The resulting confrontation may force a government shutdown. Republicans who once worked out legislative language with the help of Heritage's distinguished Ph.D.s felt whiplash seeing the group cheerlead for collapse. Heritage was supposed to be above politics, they grumbled. Heritage was supposed to be about serious ideas, not tactical fights. White papers, not political campaigns -- and certainly not campaigns against Republicans.

more...

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/09/the-fall-of-the-heritage-foundation-and-the-death-of-republican-ideas/279955/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Fall of the Heritage Foundation and the Death of Republican Ideas (Original Post) babylonsister Sep 2013 OP
The Heritage Foundation has dominated public policy discussion for far too long! LongTomH Sep 2013 #1
They were always an ideological spin shop to put an academic veneer... JHB Sep 2013 #2
"By the end of Reagan’s 1st year in office, 60% of the Mandate’s 2,000 ideas were being implemented" phantom power Sep 2013 #3
Probably not Hydra Sep 2013 #5
This should sound really strange Hydra Sep 2013 #4

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
1. The Heritage Foundation has dominated public policy discussion for far too long!
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 12:30 PM
Sep 2013

I hope to live to see them become an historical footnote, and a joke!

One of the many areas where the Heritage Foundation has dominated public dialogue is our discussion of the future. Do a Google search on "Heritage Foundation" AND nanotechnology.

JHB

(37,154 posts)
2. They were always an ideological spin shop to put an academic veneer...
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 12:38 PM
Sep 2013

...on the conservative wish list. Think of it as "ivory tower envy".

The biggest difference now is that those now in charge (DeMint and those who selected him) have become too radical to recognize the utility of the veneer.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
3. "By the end of Reagan’s 1st year in office, 60% of the Mandate’s 2,000 ideas were being implemented"
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 12:44 PM
Sep 2013

Wonder if the Dems will ever achieve anything like that.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
5. Probably not
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 01:04 PM
Sep 2013

Since the general plan of the DLC seems to be getting the rest of that 40% put into place, they don't have as much ground to cover.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
4. This should sound really strange
Thu Sep 26, 2013, 01:03 PM
Sep 2013

But in context it makes sense. The Heritage Foundation was probably founded to drag the US to the Right, and total mission accomplished there.

Since they probably didn't think it would work this well, they're in uncharted territory now. How do they drag things even more to the right? Stay tuned...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Fall of the Heritage ...