General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo how does this end well? I mean, really?
I'm a little depressed tonight.
Here's the problem: there are parts of this country who believe people like this are responsible enough to govern the same country I live in:
[div style="width:20%;"]
[div style="width:20%;"]
[div style="width:20%;"]
The irresponsibility in voting these grifters, crazies and dimwits to national office so so incomprehensible... I have to ask, how do we get to common ground with these people in our lifetimes?
At this moment, I don't see how this works out to a good outcome. The stupidity that runs amok in large swaths of this country is crushing.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Apparently, this was the basis of a book I am intending to pick up, Ecotopia. It sounds like a great idea to me, it would be an amazing country to live in.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)We've got good schools, good baseball, and Elizabeth Warren.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)It can be our satellite states. But not too much more, I think we would be pretty selective about any states we let into our beautiful newly founded West Coast based country.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I have a sister in Seattle - it would be nice to stay in the same country with her.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)California, Oregon, California, the Northeast, and the upper midwest... these places could just become part of a contiguous Canada. If we say "please," they'll be so gobspacked that Americans know the word that they'll usher us right in.
rury
(1,021 posts)Don't leave us alone as blue islands in a sea of red!
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Go Get 'Em Tigers! (it was a great game though by both teams)
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Tigers did dominate.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)more pronounced with smaller land mass. It would be just as crazy as this one is collectively. Oregon, Washington, and California (Prop 8-land to some) are not pure.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)than the States that send multiple radical right wingers to Congress while electing Republican governors to attack public employees and women's rights. 'Just as crazy collectively' would require that our collective decisions be equally crazy currently and that is not the case. And the word 'pure' belongs to you, no one else is speaking of 'purity'. That's a Centrist meme.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Both of my brothers live there...and it's not Utopia. No place in this country right now is. Just as crazy...
Edited for spelling and word usage.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Alabama, Georgia, Alaska, Oregon, and Washington.
It's not Utopia here in Washington, certainly. But would I rather be here than Alaska, Alabama, or Georgia? You bet your ass I would. Oregon could come in second, I suppose, but that state is Portland and then nothing at all until you hit San Francisco so, I'll pass.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Probably the closest that I've experienced.
Other than some of the course work, of course.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)California has plenty of crazy right-wing Republican nutters. And they continue to lose elections.
Obama won, what, over 60% of the CA vote? Pretty impressive for the nation's largest state.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)Western Oregon and Northern California
JBoy
(8,021 posts)gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)and there has long been talk about Eastern WA and Northern ID wanting to form the state of Republic
Zorra
(27,670 posts)N. Eastern Washington who have been practicing the Ecotopia thing for 4 decades, plus there's the Colville Rez and the Spokane and Kalispel tribes as well
I grew up there.
Many folks there would be absolutely priceless fountains of knowledge and experience in making an Ecotopian nation successful. They know how to grow food and use alternative energy systems, and also how to manage small scale alternative economies.
The conservatives would simply leave when they found that life was becoming too clean and pleasant for them.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)I lived for four years in Eastern WA also was just in Colville and also in Kalispell in the past 6 weeks.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Close enough for the internet, there's relatively few people in N. Central and N. Eastern WA north of Spokane. I know the town of Colville very well, but did not grow up in a town.
Do you mean you were just in Kalispel, Montana? I don't believe there is any town called Kalispel of in Washington
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)I spent 4 years all over Eastern WA Almira, Coulee City, Omak, Brewster, Okanogan, Tri Cities, Pullman, Spokane, Wenatchee, Colbert, Colfax in fact my wife is from Kennewick
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Know all of the area well. Have relatives in Wilbur (up the road from Almira and Coulee City.
Wenatchee is nice, and so is the area around Chelan Lake. been in all of the cities you have mentioned as well as every small town in N. Idaho, including my favorite Athol, Idaho.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)of Pend Oreille, Stevens, Ferry, and Okanogan County combined. I grew up in one of those counties. Going to Spokane was a trip to the big city for us. lol.
I love the north half of Eastern WA except it gets too cold for me in the wintertime nowadays. But I'd move back there if I could spend the rest of my days as a citizen of the United States of Calwashegon.
Are your relatives in Wilbur wheat farmers by any chance? Most everyone there is.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)my favorite Northern Idaho town is Sandpoint
grantcart
(53,061 posts)gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)I spent the weekend there once because I had to sing at a Methodist and Lutheran Church and loved it. Are you in Eastern WA now?
grantcart
(53,061 posts)I was in the area from 1954 -1972 and 1994-1999.
I visit every year.
barnabas63
(1,214 posts)I'm not being left behind with the kooks in eastern wa
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Alturas/Cedarville (admittedly sparsely populated) Redding area, Sierras around Placerville, Grass Valley, Nevada City.
Better than the Bakersfield/Central Valley stretch of central/southern California, certainly.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)let all the southern states secede !
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)but lets keep FL. I think all of the whack jobs would fit comfortably in TEXAS! (sorry TX DUers)
BobbyBoring
(1,965 posts)Other than that............................
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)And I'm all in.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)I'm consigned to Jesusland. I'm screwed!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)is there any way to eliminate Orange County, CA?
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Would that work?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Except I would hardly wish The republic of orange on our Mexican neighbors.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)I feel nothing for the South, they are far more alien to me than any Canadian.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Pleeease, Canada, can we have BC?!
NRaleighLiberal
(60,013 posts)I don't think that there is any common ground with most of them - too twisted by fear, hatred, or hopelessly manipulated....
Agreed - extremely disturbing.
tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)over 66 years i've seen a lot of people like these people come and go. the only thing different now is they are now publically accepted no matter how bizarre their ideas are. there is no real common ground with these people unless you are willing to step in quicksand.
just image if the democratic party was being held up for ransom by leninists or maoists...
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It was insane and lacking in basic math - maybe it was "faith-based" math where nothing needs to makes sense.
So, yeah, we're now publically accepting frothing garbage as "serious".
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The Dems *need* the Republicans in order to get away with giving the 1% a constant tongue bath.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)That's precisely why I don't believe this BS about 40 Teahadis being responsible for the "crisis."
A partial shutdown suits the deficit hawks in both parties just fine, since it's been adjusted so it doesn't actually impact payrolls in the military and Intelligence agencies. This is simply austerity and cuts to social programs without anyone having to actually vote for it, and that's making the Center-Right smile.
Of course, they won't allow actual default of the debt - the "threat" of that just another psychological device to make this seem like a real crisis. It's not - it's simply austerity by default.
If 40 members of the House could force this sort of thing, the House Progressive Caucus would be running the frickin' government.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)We are being played like fools. Again.
Of course, they won't allow actual default of the debt - the "threat" of that just another psychological device to make this seem like a real crisis. It's not - it's simply austerity by default.
Good god. When does this country wake the hell up.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)are, but playing on the partisanship of both parties is an old trick. I agree with leveymeg, this couldn't happen unless someone or some entity with a lot of power, didn't want it to.
And already they dropped the original excuse of ending the ACA and have moved on to what this is really all about, cutting SS and Medicare etc. It is all about Austerity, which we don't call it here.
I really wish people would wake up before it's too late.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2013, 07:10 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023848527
No, it's not a fluke. It's the same old con game, in which Democrats collude to ensure continuation of the latest predatory scheme.
Again.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)with Repubs in order to get legislation passed. Then switch them next time and allow a different 'few' Dems to help get the right wing policies passed.
And we are STILL hearing defenses for this, even now when it has all been proven to be so disastrous for this country.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)There are always just enough Democrats joining ranks with Republicans to ensure the 1% always gets what it wants, and the Working Class gets stuck with the tab.
In my younger, naive days, I believed that the Voting Record was the Touchstone by which the bad Democrats could be separated from the good ones.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Votes are traded and sold freely,
with always just enough to betray the Working Class continuously with no single Dem taking ALL the heat.
Most of DU still doesn't get that,
and we ponder excuses for WHY a normally solid appearing Dem suddenly turns against Party on a particular vote.
....but he/she "votes with the party 91% of the time, so its OK."
One minute, its Jay Rockefeller as the Prime Villain leading the way in protecting Bush surveillance programs and demanding telecom immunity;
...the next minute, its Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer joining hands and breaking with their party to ensure Michael Mukaseys confirmation as Attorney General;
...then its Big Bad Joe Lieberman single-handedly blocking Medicare expansion;
...then its Blanche Lincoln and Jim Webb joining with Lindsey Graham to support the de-funding of civilian trials for Terrorists;
....and now that they cant blame Lieberman or Ben Nelson any longer on health care (since they dont need 60 votes), Jay Rockefeller voluntarily returns to the Villain Role, stepping up to put an end to the pretend-movement among Senate Democrats to enact the public option via reconciliation.
<more>
http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/democrats_34/
You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)but this is the first time I've seen it "voiced." It's sort of like the sequester, which is never going to go away and which will squeeze the poor and the middle class even harder beginning in 2014. I do hope you're right about the debt default in that "they" won't allow an actual default but I can see the Machiavellian reasoning for scaring the shit out of everyone so more of what's left of the safety net gets eliminated.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2013, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)
Please, see, "Selective Shutdown Over for Pentagon. The Light just got turned on the Kabuki Theater Stage," http://election.democraticunderground.com/10023791304
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)in the air the next day so I missed it altogether. Good article and I agree with most of you points but I don't see Obama caving on the Grand Bargain. At this point, he can give NO quarter to the lunatic fringe and he knows it.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)There will be very little resistance heard from the Dem side of the isle to the preordained terms of further, permanent cuts to pensions and privatization of social programs. It's precisely what's been playing out in Europe, as well, according to a slightly different script.
CrispyQ
(36,442 posts)I was thrilled when the dems held strong. Then I heard some military was getting funded & then some intelligence was getting funded & I realized that they are all getting what they want. I'll wait & see how it all pans out, but this president, & the party in general, don't have a lot of credibility with me when it comes to standing strong. I'm worried that we are about to get played screwed big time.
Now's the time to move as close to an affluent area as you can. Get as close to the banquet table as you can afford to, & hope they drop enough crumbs to live off of. Wait till climate change really gets going & the extreme weather of the past few years goes . . . extreme.
http://lasthours.org/
Some think this mini-documentary is alarmist, but I think it's exactly what TPTB are preparing for. They are building as big a cushion as they can, cuz they know the fall is coming & it's gonna hurt bad & be ugly. It's about 12 minutes.
I'll go give your other thread a kick.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)on this possibility a few days ago too. levy had some valuable insights in that thread too.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)That's a damned crime, but totally believable. They're doing it.
However, by sustaining the defunding of social programs, this moves more and more people to acting out in the streets and it gets more dangerous.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)the media props them up. I mean, it is false equivalency in the extreme. If the media was fair they wouldn't stand a chance. Their whole foundation is built on dishonesty.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)non-insane alternative. As long as ordinary liberal and progressive minded people feel under such immediate threat from the crazies - moving boldly toward a progressive agenda and progressive candidates is very difficult - "Why risk it for a candidate who might actually move the country forward - when it is safer to stick with a center-right centrist who is at least not BATSHIT cuckoo?"
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)It's right in our face.
I'm sorry to say. It's an easy ruse.
They used it in all the left-leaning Central America countries in the 1980s. Mostly it turned into a free (money) for all. They all got wealthy, all the participants. Iran-Contra?
They used their ill-gotten gains to reconstruct the government in their own image. You're living in it right now.
Remember Eisenhower's little speech? Why would the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in WWII warn us about the Military Industrial Complex in his farewell address to the nation ending his presidential term? Think he was just wasting words? He didn't even mention the Soviet Union. Odd. I guess he based his warning on the basis of his threat assessment.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I got all caught up in that. Then, I thought, how long is this? I love Firesigntheatre.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)This is what many of us have been saying. While many supposed liberals were busy savaging a Democratic President, many other folks were busy attacking people like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz and rightly so.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Both at the Republicans and the collaborators in our own party.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)I just didn't understand it. Whether or not they would actually vote for those two is, of course, another matter, but the fact that they defended these charlatans while simultaneously savaging President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid, as well as BlueDogDems, went beyond just criticizing Democrats and affected people more than they care to know. And then 2010 happened.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)actually means something and we're not just taking anybody who can't quite fit in the GOP tent.
Almost fit...but not quite. I can think of a few Democrats in Congress that have at-least one foot and most of a hip in that GOP tent.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I'm gonna go find some mud to sling at Republicans who are trying to tear down this country and create chaos.
Peace.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I can picture Tweety saying that, "Attacking Dems like Obama only strengthens people like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul."
You are a riot!
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)only encourages them to keep "triangulating" and extending the hand to people like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)there will be more than enough time to purge the quislings from our own party.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Can you imagine if Obama had fought as hard for the 99% as he fought for banker bonuses? There'd be no guarantee of success, but if he had been able to turn the 99%'s economy around we'd have healthy Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress today.
The non-stop triangulating and catering to Wall Street does nothing to win Democratic votes. Making people's lives better is a winning strategy. Relying on Republicans to suck worse is an awful, awful strategy.
BTW, why do you think Lincoln fired his losing generals? After all, shouldn't he have been focused on the South, who started the war?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I'll focus my attacks on people like Cruz, Paul, Bachmann and Gohmert....thank you very much.
If these recent days haven't shown you that Dems like Pelosi, Obama and Reid are what stands between us and total fucking chaos, then I don't know what to tell you.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)21 years of nonstop appeasement, triangulation and capitulation.
But Wall Street's doing great, huh?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The people between us and total chaos don't need knives in their backs from supposed liberals.
You've seen how willing the GOP is to crash the entire country...why stick a knife in the backs of Dems?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Putting Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block?
Unlimited banker bailouts, but squat for the middle class, who continue to see their wages fall while Jamie and Lloyd sup regularly at the White House?
Larry Summers running economic policy, backed by a White House staffed with bankers and Republicans?
A pen knife in my back is preferable to a cutlass, but both are bad.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)StevePaulson
(174 posts)The wealthy have 50 trillion dollars in assets making sure nothing in our country changes except for their benefit. They totally own the GOP, and half the Dems too. Reality. It is amazing Obama got anything done. The only way we got Obamacare through is by agreeing not to touch PHARMA's gravy train, and giving handouts to the HMO's. C'mon folks. Wake up and smell the bodies burning..... America's enemy is the 1% as much as the Republicans. Just remember. Not all 1%ers are bad. Just most of them.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The ACA also opens the door to the Public Treasury to the Health Insurance Industry.
(The Subsidies for the Poor don't really go to The Poor,
but are paid directly to the private Health Insurance Corporations)
Not only are we subsidizing Wall Street,
but we are NOW subsidizing Wall Street's Incestuous 1st Cousin,
the Health Insurance Industry, with a guaranteed 15% skim off the top,
and mandated customers.
We are subsidizing the most useless industry the World has ever seen.
The Health Insurance Industry:
*Manufactures NOTHING
*Provides NO useful service
*Creates NO (Value Added) Wealth
The Health Insurance Industry contributes NOTHING to America,
but will be subsidized by $BILLIONS of Taxpayer dollars
which will NOT go toward Health CARE.
Great Work if you have the right connections.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)"By their stock price you shall really know what the law's about."?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)by Obama's "being bipartisan" and giving away the store in his first two years and Reid for not shutting down Republican/Blue Dog filibusters in the Senate during the same time.
Since then, Obama's come around but Reid hasn't.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm not going to knock what they're doing and accomplishing (not that you'll notice anyway, I suppose) but really, just because they're what we have does not mean that they're all we should ever hope for. Nor should we satisfy ourselves with believing what they are giving is the absolute best we can expect of them. Know what I mean?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Dang, Manny. If we don't criticize we are giving our approval of this destructive agenda.
CrispyQ
(36,442 posts)Of course, they wouldn't get offered cushy, corporate jobs after their time in office.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)but the OP thinks that constantly denigrating and mocking Democrats is the way to get more Democrats elected.
Strange.
Sid
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Do you believe this guy "denigrated" Democrats?
or held them to a higher standard?
"I've seen it happen time after time. When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the Fair Deal, and says he really doesn't believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign."
---President Harry Truman
[font size=4]Leadership! "The Buck Stops HERE!" NO Excuses![/font]
Personally, I believe in holding our Democrats to the Traditional Democratic Party Values
that made our Party GREAT,
and built the largest, wealthiest, and most Upwardly Mobile Working Class
the World had ever seen.
I can understand that people who don't live here
and are NOT members of the Democratic Party,
and do NOT vote in our elections,
and are NOT affected by the results,
may have difficulty understanding this simple fact of American politics.
You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)His sign should have read "The buck stops with Congress I'm not a dictator after all."
Regards,
Third-Way Manny
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The least he could have dome was spend 6 years seeking Bi-Partisan Consensus!
Just because he won an election and all,
that is no reason to push for Democratic Policies and everything!!!!
Think about the Poor Republicans feelings!!!
So much better to Meet them Half Way so they don't feel neglected and catch an Inferiority Complex. Got to tell America that "they" have some good ideas too!
THEN they will share with us!
We need to think of THEM and be the Adults,
or Rush & Hannity will say BAD Things about us.
After All,
Obama has to be the President of ALL the People,
even the Republicans.
They do the same for us when they win elections!
It is not like The Democrats have a MANDATE for CHANGE from the American People or anything!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)It's just what Clinton did, more or less. And it was a disaster then. And it's been a disaster for Obama.
While I think that Obama really, really likes rich people, and is very indifferent to the rest of us, I don't think he was looking for *this* level of bullshit.
I guess the 11 dimensional stuff eludes me.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Plus, great news, 8% of the the electorate dies between Presidential elections. That's a lot of old conservatives! These guys have a limited shelf life.
Meanwhile, sane Representatives are being heard by the people. For example,
Rep. Suzanne Bonamici: U.S. economy should not be bargaining chip in health care debate - Opinion
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023838918
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)"Plus, great news, 8% of the the electorate dies between Presidential elections."
They have to win NOW!
"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater
Frank Zappa
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 13, 2013, 10:28 AM - Edit history (1)
1) Getting control over the SCOTUS. They have been at the center of the worst changes in this country, and we cannot fix much of anything until we get rid of that wacko 5. It is looking like Obama may not have another appointment, and if he did, it would be a centrist because he probably figures that's all he can get past the Senate. So as a practical matter, this means winning the 2016 election and controlling the Senate in the 2017 term. Holding on to the Senate in 2014 is a challenge, but the numbers are very favorable for the 2016 election cycle. Meanwhile we need to be fighting hard to put real progressives into all judicial offices that are open now.
2) Win at the state level. We must be in a much better position by the time of the next census, which isn't that far away. It wasn't long ago that we were in a pretty strong position at the state level. Howard Dean's 50-state strategy paid lots of dividends there. We need to get back to that. Basically we need to take any of the DLCers who talk about triangulation and narrow paths to victory and throw them overboard. We need to take the fight to all 50 states. OK, we probably won't win in Utah and Mississippi, but we ought to be fighting hard everywhere else.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Duppers
(28,117 posts)So do I, BlueStreak.
Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)The Rs don't want to follow the laws in the USA and would rather live in a feudal country full of superstition and an "ownership culture". A better end to it would be the arrest of the Rs who refuse to follow the laws in the USA along with prosecution of war criminals and single payer health care so the Rs could get the mental health attention they need badly.
But it'll likely end with some backroom deal to cut SS and Medicare via "austerity measures". Of course the public won't know anything about it until it's about to happen, then the public will be terrorized with some fake terror BS as a distraction. It's the 1%er playbook they've been following for decades. The stupid public will fall for all the propaganda as usual and Rs will remain firmly in place as complete lunatics that are supposed to be some minority opinion party in a false left/right paradigm.
BTW, Bill Moyers mentioned secession recently so all the clowns who think it's crazy talk should try to be rational for a few minutes in their emotionally propagandized lives.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)The red states suck cash from the blue states, then they moon us.
I think we'll need to dump them, they'll stay for the handouts.
2naSalit
(86,505 posts)I see a problem with that. I live in a red state, why? Because I like to live near our national treasures in the form of natural resources like vast tracts of forests that are publicly owned because I prefer wildlife to people for one thing. And I do my level best to continuously vote blue. My state has an R controlled legislature but a D governor and both Senators... go figure. At least it's a little less egregiously red than the state I lived in before I moved to this one, just across the state line a couple miles from here, same general community.
If you get rid of the red states, you'll get rid of the largest national parks and greatest amount of national forest in the country, like 89% of the land mass in the lower 48 that is owned by the public, administered by the feds. Once that gets sold off, the living conditions for the rest of the land mass of the continent is going to be crapola, we have the the natural stuff that makes the air clean and has the cleanest water... forest and snowpack.
Please don't forget that part.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)That's why I live in Alaska. We catch a lot of flak for the federal largesse that comes our way, but 60% of the state is federally owned, national parks and monuments, national forests, military bases, etc. We have a larger federal work force per capita than almost any other state, and all those people get paid -- that's why so much federal money comes here. Alaska is taking a pretty hard hit during this gov't shutdown.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)National Park is overrated. No vast public forests here. Only in Red States. Got you.
2naSalit
(86,505 posts)consider the significance of those areas compared to that of the northern Rockies. Looking at a map of the continent is helpful at this point... one that shows the rivers and perhaps the public lands designations too. Notice that all those forests and National Parks along the Pacific Ocean are of a particular watershed... all the snow and rain that falls there drains back into the Pacific Ocean. Yes, it's nice that there are national forests and parks in those states but the eastern portions of those states depend on the water from the northern Rockies' watershed for the majority of their water. Ask yourself;
Where does the Columbia/Snake River complex originate?
And for the southern end of the Pacific coastal region, where does the Colorado River originate?
And then there's the eastern side of the Rockies' watershed... that goes all the way to the Mississippi River and all that part of the plains depend on the Red states for their water Platte River Aquifer, Oglalla Aquifer, Platte River, Arkansas River, Missouri River... they're all in Red states and most originate or are replenished by way of the Rocky Mountains. The farthest detectable origin of the Missouri is about six miles from where I sit right now, the other headwaters are in Yellowstone NP down the road a bit. The Snake River origins are partially within view from my window in the east side of the cabin I live in... I live just below the continental divide where the grizzly bears are (there are none in CA, OR and WA btw).
So yeah, you've got some nice forests and parks over there with trees and ferns and such but when you start to look and see where water for about a third or more of the lower 48 comes from, it's right here in the Rockies. It's too bad that these states have the misfortune of wild-eyed Rs running the show here but that can change with education and emigration to some degree.
Sorry if I ruffled your feathers but the reality is pretty much as I have described.
Duppers
(28,117 posts)"If you get rid of the red states, you'll get rid of the largest national parks and greatest amount of national forest in the country, like 89% of the land mass in the lower 48 that is owned by the public, administered by the feds."
Indeed. Thank you for posting this!
You saw this?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023823058
2naSalit
(86,505 posts)since I live next to the two states screaming the loudest to do just that, I hear about it all the time, argue against it often... and I vote. Thanks for posting that link though, others should see that and ponder this issue.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...and working to make things better.
Helping to turn the South Blue
The South is beautiful,
and belongs to us all.
It would be a shame to just give this all away.
In 2006, My Wife & I moved from a Big Blue Northern City
to the dark RED Rural South.
Our goal is to reduce OUR Carbon Footprint,
and produce MORE than we consume.
So far, so good.
We love it here.
We won't be going back.
Living Well on a LOW "Taxable" Income,
and stuff we learned in the 60s
Good Luck to us all.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And break up. Not crazee talk, not at all
NBachers
(17,097 posts)What makes you think giving them a fifth, or a quarter, or a third, of our nation, will make them shut up and leave us alone? It will only become a base from which to launch attacks against the remaining part of the country. Porous borders will bleed terrorists and saboteurs. And the ones remaining in our new country will be emboldened collaborationists, because nothing you give them will ever be enough. They will keep trying to grab more and more.
They are a rabid horde of rapacious zombies. They will never be satisfied.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)They imagine
Myrina
(12,296 posts)... no gov't interference, no gun laws, survival of the fittest ... all that ...
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Amen brother!
The dumbing down of America coming to roost. Still we lag in taking charge of our educational system. That's where it all starts. I'm sure home schooling is appropriate in responsible hands but WTF : http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/jesus-camp/
Education will cure most of the pains that's why it's getting hammered so much. I do see the positive in chapter schools but IMHO they siphon money away from brick and mortar schools, plus adding another layer bureaucracy that can be manipulated very effectively to defraud tax payers and siphon large amounts of money.
It starts when their young Manny, that's where we need to pay attention. Turn that tide then pulling the weed roots and all becomes a possibility.
Your friend,
-p
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)filling Congress by an opt-in sortition system. The original democracies used sortition; we should too.
yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)As the UNITED STATES Government goes up in flames. HOW Do YOU DEAL with that kind of mentality?
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Tuesday it drops more when it hits 14199 then the Senate advances a near unanimous combined bill that will give a CR at about Sequester levels and debt ceiling through election.
Boehner has no choice to bring it to the floor with 40 Republicans and the Democratic caucus.
Everyone but the House Republicans proclaim victory.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)The GOP Senators filibustered it.
Reid still hasn't learned.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)on Monday.
starroute
(12,977 posts)My expectation is that we're in for a roller coaster ride over the next 5 to 10 years -- a period of social upheaval, extreme polarization, and changes in attitudes and circumstances that are presently unimaginable.
Once it's over and things calm down again, everything will be different -- and probably in many ways better. We may actually be doing something meaningful about climate change, for example.
But there are also certain imponderables. One is how much damage will have been done along the way. Another is whether the United States will be able to adapt gracefully to what will be a very different world or whether it will rip itself apart in the name of its own exceptionalism.
That's what I see as the job of folks like us here at DU -- not to prevent the changes, but to make sure they happen as smoothly as possible in what is bound to be a very difficult time. I know a lot of us have been half-consciously preparing for that. I hope we're up to the task.
mike_c
(36,280 posts)Frankly, I don't believe that it is possible. I mean, unless we put something in the water, like a clue.
ffr
(22,665 posts)There's huge sums of money to be made in a world financial market crash and Boehner is in the driver's seat making sure it's going to be a terrible disaster for all of us. Meanwhile, he and his are probably short selling everything.
You can make a ton of money off the stock market if you know what it's going to do.
Down 400 points on Monday. Down 4,000 on Thursday.
munster69
(107 posts)The big NYC casino will make you rich, if your in the right circle.
gopiscrap
(23,733 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)7 million years ago, Jesus carried a rifle and kept the dinosaurs from eating the apes style. And the commies. They excel at being completely wrong and so far off topic that most average adults can recognize the lack of depth of reality in their words and eyes.
Sadly Congress doesn't work like reality for the millions and millions of us in the real world.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)and I don't see how this is going to end well.
hooverville29
(163 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)So it's going to end well however you cut it.
The question is whether they're doused in gasoline or napalm when they light the match.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Just an idea.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)all that stuff would be a better use of the President's talents.
Just a thought.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Now why would he go and do that?
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)nt
Lobo27
(753 posts)caseymoz
(5,763 posts)We'll know how bad this is in a week.
delrem
(9,688 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)The illusion is in thinking we can have it all our way because our way is the right way and theirs is wrong.
The truth is there needs to be compromise to get agreement even if some parts are stupid.
If our side demands it all our way and the other side has the ability to block it all then the reality is there will be a shutdown.
Turbineguy
(37,312 posts)This isn't a TV show where everything will turn out OK in the end.
MarchemintotheSea
(50 posts)I can see a very good ending to all of this but things will get very messy before they become good once and for all provided a permanent solution occurs.
GeorgeGist
(25,317 posts)He made stupidity respectable.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)brought up my recent retirement and wanted to know when my wife was going to retire. I said real soon thanks to the ACA Obama Care. That's when they went berserk, lol.
Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)That's the problem. We never will, and need to stop trying. The more time and energy we waste on trying to find accord with them the weaker we get, and we only end up moving our position further and further toward them in our effort to find that nonexistent common ground.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)for "reach-around."
99Forever
(14,524 posts)It isn't just the antisocial assholiness of the Teapublicans, it's the way the Dems keep pretending they are "powerless to stop them."
We are being played for suckers.
I, for one, am not fooled.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)They would sleep very well at night if they could impose their complete agenda on us (even though it goes against everything we believe in). They wouldn't lose a minute of sleep.
And, neither would I (if we were ever successful in truly adopting liberal/progressive legislation).
Our political enemies have fought against just about every good thing that's happened in this country for a very long time.
I can't be bothered trying to find common ground with them. They truly are motivated by greed and fear, and I just don't know how to find common ground with that.
Maybe some within our ranks have a better idea, but I say just keep fighting for our agenda, and don't let up for a minute trying to appease them. Appeasing/compromising with them ALWAYS hurts average families and individuals.
ALWAYS.
spanone
(135,812 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)There are two species in our culture. We are currently dealing with the last gasps of the former species.
You're right. This will not end well. For them.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)warrenswil
(60 posts)There is no solution in sight to the government shutdown, but even worse, the debt ceiling is just four days from today.
If we hit it, and the Treasury cant pay its bills, this is not only a huge financial disaster it could also lead to a constitutional crisis.
We explained how in
Constitutional crisis likely to follow default
President Obama could be forced to disobey the law to save the global financial system.
If he does, then the loony radicals in the GOP in the House could impeach him.
They have done it before remember Monica Lewinsky? They impeached Bill Clinton for getting a blow job!
They are much more insane now.
Fasten your seat belts. This might be a bumpy ride.
In the (K)now
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Reagan, Poppy & Bush the Dimmer competent to govern.
I even have a newfound appreciation for Richard Nixon in the current context.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Just saying.....
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)On the other hand, he was actually toying with ideas like a Guaranteed Minimum Income and a national health insurance program.
His opening of China looked good at the time, too--although of course later events have proved it to be a mixed blessing at best.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Granting China Most Favored Nation Trade Status was.
Thank You, Bill Clinton!
Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)As the saying goes "you can't fix stupid."
B Calm
(28,762 posts)strong and united!
on point
(2,506 posts)And totally undercuts the puke tactics
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I fail to see the point of our continuing as one nation when we aren't.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)yes.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)Eventually, we will nail one (or multiple) of these big time r. wingers with a clear, unadulterated case of pure treason (whether violent or plotting).
I'm not trying to make some grand prediction. I think everyone at DU can feel it coming.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)They should be held accountable - not treated as if their choice is just as acceptable as other choices.
Makes me sick with Dem "leaders" treat the crazies as if they're "patriotic Americans."
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)I haven't spoken to my wife in years. I didn't want to interrupt her.
I drink too much. The last time I gave a urine sample it had an olive in it.
I was so ugly my mother used to feed me with a sling shot.
I get no respect. The way my luck is running, if I was a politician I would be honest.
I told my psychiatrist that everyone hates me. He said I was being ridiculous - everyone hasn't met me yet.
This morning when I put on my underwear I could hear the fruit-of-the-loom guys laughing at me.
I'm at the age where food has taken the place of sex in my life. In fact, I've just had a mirror put over my kitchen table.
I had plenty of pimples as a kid. One day I fell asleep in the library. When I woke up, a blind man was reading my face.
I came from a real tough neighborhood. I put my hand in some cement once and felt another hand.
When I was born I was so ugly the doctor slapped my mother.
When I was a kid my parents moved a lot, but I always found them.
I remember the time I was kidnapped and they sent a piece of my finger to my father. He said he wanted more proof.
Yeah, I know I'm ugly... I said to a bartender, 'Make me a zombie.' He said 'God beat me to it.'
I looked up my family tree and found out I was the sap.
It's tough to stay married. My wife kisses the dog on the lips, yet she won't drink from my glass.
My psychiatrist told me I was crazy and I said I want a second opinion. He said okay, you're ugly too.
~Rodney Dangerfield
- Hope ya feelin' better!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)From a great generation of comedians.
My dad sat next to Rodney on a flight once. He did, indeed, drink too much!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Flip, Red Foxx, Joan Rivers...The Church of What's Happenin'
Those guys back then...thank goodness for Google for a bit of remembering and laughter.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)steve2470
(37,457 posts)I'm just hoping there is a secret Plan B where the debt limit is passed at the last minute and the idiots declare their deluded version of victory.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Are you postulating or expecting a silver lining from a nuclear mushroom cloud?
AlinPA
(15,071 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Send them all to the federal pen under the RICO Act.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)congratulations.
marble falls
(57,063 posts)TxDemChem
(1,918 posts)so many ignorant assholes. I remember when not being stupid and not destroying the country were the preferred qualities in our politicians. The tea party has turned everything ass backwards.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023842041
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)Our voices need to be heard by everyone. Tell your Democratic friends. Tell them each to tell their Democratic friends. And so on and so forth.
Organize, organize, organize. Agitate, agitate, agitate. Make your voices heard. Get Out The Vote. Start local.
It's the only way to stop this madness.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)at least pacific.
It will all make sense. And increase your dividends.
How else can these fools get into office?
hooverville29
(163 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)You DON'T.
You outnumber them.
Keep in mind that half of this country doesn't vote so all you have to to is get that half on our side.
Most are already there.
TomClash
(11,344 posts)There will not be a default whether they cut a deal or not.
Bank on it.
wouldsman
(94 posts)Righties need to understand how an American default will look to the rest of the globe. Most righties view nearly all of European countries as Socialist and obviously China as Communist. If Capitalist America defaults while China is robustly growing and flush with cash, and a pocket full of IOU's with our name on them, and Socialist Europe stands steady while being able to give their citizens free college education, comfortable retirements, full coverage healthcare, maternity and paternity leave and several weeks of paid vacation every year, then the debate will be over. And the winner will not be American style capitalism. The Tea Party Republicans are holding the cards. Their decision will show the world which economic system is the winner.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)mountain grammy
(26,608 posts)Azathoth
(4,607 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)We can move forward when people stop supporting Wall St and start supporting representative democracy.
So in other words, never.
People like the idea of doing well for others and leaving a better world for their offspring. As long as you can achieve that by supporting Lockheed, Dow & ALEC of course. That is the exact moment people change from liberal advocates to financial backers of the shut it all down movement. "Fuck you, I got mine." is strong in them.
OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)..and yes, I suggested this in another post.
17 or more relatively sane Republicans (like the ones who have already said they want a clean CR) show up for work tomorrow and make the following deal with House Dems:
1) They agree to renounce their Republican Party membership. They declare themselves as "Independent". "Bull Moose Party", whatever...
2) They also agree to caucus with the Dems.
3) The Dems, in exchange, name one of these intrepid folks Speaker, and others are awarded plummy committee assignments.
4) Together, we end this mess.
5) We'll agree to maintain this relationship until the 2014 mid-terms.
6) If they then wish, we will sit down with the relatively sane former Republicans, along with any non-Tea Party members who care to join in - and together, we will look at how a balance of prudent spending cuts and prudent revenue increases could be used in tandem to pass a balanced budget.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)It's just the Citizen's United has given them political clout. Chris Hayes has been profiling these people the last few weeks, and clearly none of them could hold a job in the private sector -- or consequently have the financial resources to run for office. They'd just be your loud-mouthed, bat shit crazy uncle at the family reunion spouting nonsense that everyone ignores.
Take away Citizen's United and you'll deflate this balloon. We'll always have nutjobs in Congress (Jesse Helms) but there will be few enough of them that they're manageable.