Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
1. I heard that The Senate will have 60 votes for cloture. But Boehner in The House is against ENDA.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:08 PM
Nov 2013

We really must get The House back in 2014 !!!



p.s. I heard a Republican call it eDna on the TV today - LOL

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
2. Reid Remarks On The Employment Non-Discrimination Act
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:14 PM
Nov 2013

Note: The text below is from a .gov website therefore exempt from the four paragraph copyright rule.


Reid Remarks On The Employment Non-Discrimination Act

“In 33 states, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people can be fired or harassed just for being who they are.”

“A patchwork of state laws that excludes tens of millions of American from basic protection from discrimination is simply not good enough. It is time for Congress to pass a federal law that ensures all Americans – regardless of where they live – can go to work unafraid to be themselves.”

“I urge my colleagues to vote with me tonight to begin debate on a bill that would affirm the equal rights and freedoms of every American, and to do so simply because it is the right thing to do.”


Washington, D.C. – Nevada Senator Harry Reid spoke on the Senate floor today regarding S.815 – the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:

Springfield, Massachusetts police officer Michael Carney fought for two and a half years to get his job back – and he won. After he took a medical leave of absence, Springfield officials refused to reinstate Officer Carney because the veteran officer had revealed he was gay. But Officer Carney was determined to return to the force. And because he lives in Massachusetts – one of only 17 states that protect employees against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity – Officer Carney is now back on the job serving and protecting the people of Springfield.

I am pleased to say Nevada law also includes robust protections against this type of discrimination.

Officer Carney testified before the House of Representatives in 2007, and shared his story. This is what he said: “I’m a good cop, but I have lost two-and-a-half years of employment fighting to get that job back because I’m gay. And I never would have been able to do that had I not lived in Massachusetts or in one of the handful of other states that protect… employees from discrimination.”

Sadly, not everyone is able to fight back like Officer Carney did. In 33 states, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people can be fired or harassed just for being who they are.

West Virginia coal miner Sam Hall was terrorized by his coworkers for seven years because he was gay. Mr. Hall just wanted to make a living. But supervisors told him he would have to endure the persecution if he wanted to keep his job. West Virginia is one of 33 states with no protections against this type of oppression.

A patchwork of state laws that excludes tens of millions of American from basic protection from discrimination is simply not good enough. It is time for Congress to pass a federal law that ensures all Americans – regardless of where they live – can go to work unafraid to be themselves. As long as hardworking, qualified Americans can be denied job opportunities, fired or harassed because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, all workers are at risk.

This week, the Senate will begin debate on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would simply afford all Americans the same protections from discrimination based on prejudice. In fact, four out of five Americans mistakenly believe these protections already exist.

Two-thirds of Americans – including a majority of Republicans – support federal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace. But once again Republicans in Congress are out of step with Republicans in the rest of the country. House Speaker John Boehner said today that he does not support this legislation. But the Speaker should take his cue from the 56 percent of Republicans nationwide who support ENDA, and bring this legislation up for a vote.

Corporations also agree non-discrimination policies are good for business. Most Fortune 500 companies already prohibit this kind of persecution. And more than 100 of the nation’s largest businesses; more than 80 national civil rights, labor, religious, civic and professional organizations; and faith leaders from many denominations have spoken out in support of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

But there’s a more important reason to support this legislation than popular support: it’s the right thing to do. Harvey Milk, the murdered California politician and gay rights activist, once said: “It takes no compromise to give people their rights…It takes no money to respect the individual. It takes no political deal to give people freedom. It takes no survey to remove repression.” All Americans – regardless of what they look like, where they live, or who they choose to love – deserve to be treated with the same respect and dignity while they earn a living. And employees should be judged on the quality of their work, on their talents and on their performance, not on their sexual orientation or their gender identity.

I urge my colleagues to vote with me tonight to begin debate on a bill that would affirm the equal rights and freedoms of every American, and to do so simply because it is the right thing to do.

http://democrats.senate.gov/2013/11/04/reid-remarks-on-the-employment-non-discrimination-act/

Mass

(27,315 posts)
3. Still 58 votes at this point. I hope that he did not make a mistake by scheduling this vote on a
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:17 PM
Nov 2013

Monday night.

Well, he can always bring it back.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
6. No, it does NOT go to The House yet. The Senate has to have a final vote first.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:39 PM
Nov 2013

There is first a Senate cloture vote, then Senate debate time, then a final Senate vote.



Mass

(27,315 posts)
7. Thanks, that is what I thought, but Landrieu confused me.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:41 PM
Nov 2013

I hope they do not have to have the whole series of vote: Motion to Proceed, cloture, vote.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
8. Huh?
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:46 PM
Nov 2013

The Senate cloture vote was the motion to proceed onto the debate.

Now it will be in debate for I think 30 hours unless they agree to a shorter period of time - or something like that.

When the debate time is up then The Senate will hold the final vote.

But it looks like Boehner will not bring it to the floor in The House for a vote and if he doesn't then it will just die over there as a pending bill.



Mass

(27,315 posts)
9. No, it was cloture FOR the motion to proceed.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:48 PM
Nov 2013

there could be a vote for the MOtion for proceed and a vote for cloture for the bill itself. It depends what they agreed to.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
10. What they just did was the CLOTURE vote for the BILL to proceed to debate
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:50 PM
Nov 2013

The next vote will be the final vote.



Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
13. But this was THE Cloture vote. There also can be votes on amendments coming up.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 08:00 PM
Nov 2013

But those are not 'cloture' votes.



Mass

(27,315 posts)
14. OK. I am going to stop the discussion. We' ll see.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 08:01 PM
Nov 2013

Read the name of the vote; cloture on the motion to proceed

There still can be cloture to end debate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The first ENDA vote just ...