General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe first ENDA vote just started : Cloture motion on the motion to proceed.
Last edited Mon Nov 4, 2013, 07:38 PM - Edit history (2)
Unclear what the next step is.
Landrieu seemed to think it is the last one and it moves to the House.
Think Progress says it is just the first vote http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/11/04/2888261/senate-passes-enda/
SO, I am unsure.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)We really must get The House back in 2014 !!!
p.s. I heard a Republican call it eDna on the TV today - LOL
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Note: The text below is from a .gov website therefore exempt from the four paragraph copyright rule.
Reid Remarks On The Employment Non-Discrimination Act
In 33 states, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people can be fired or harassed just for being who they are.
A patchwork of state laws that excludes tens of millions of American from basic protection from discrimination is simply not good enough. It is time for Congress to pass a federal law that ensures all Americans regardless of where they live can go to work unafraid to be themselves.
I urge my colleagues to vote with me tonight to begin debate on a bill that would affirm the equal rights and freedoms of every American, and to do so simply because it is the right thing to do.
Washington, D.C. Nevada Senator Harry Reid spoke on the Senate floor today regarding S.815 the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:
Springfield, Massachusetts police officer Michael Carney fought for two and a half years to get his job back and he won. After he took a medical leave of absence, Springfield officials refused to reinstate Officer Carney because the veteran officer had revealed he was gay. But Officer Carney was determined to return to the force. And because he lives in Massachusetts one of only 17 states that protect employees against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity Officer Carney is now back on the job serving and protecting the people of Springfield.
I am pleased to say Nevada law also includes robust protections against this type of discrimination.
Officer Carney testified before the House of Representatives in 2007, and shared his story. This is what he said: Im a good cop, but I have lost two-and-a-half years of employment fighting to get that job back because Im gay. And I never would have been able to do that had I not lived in Massachusetts or in one of the handful of other states that protect employees from discrimination.
Sadly, not everyone is able to fight back like Officer Carney did. In 33 states, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people can be fired or harassed just for being who they are.
West Virginia coal miner Sam Hall was terrorized by his coworkers for seven years because he was gay. Mr. Hall just wanted to make a living. But supervisors told him he would have to endure the persecution if he wanted to keep his job. West Virginia is one of 33 states with no protections against this type of oppression.
A patchwork of state laws that excludes tens of millions of American from basic protection from discrimination is simply not good enough. It is time for Congress to pass a federal law that ensures all Americans regardless of where they live can go to work unafraid to be themselves. As long as hardworking, qualified Americans can be denied job opportunities, fired or harassed because of their sexual orientation or gender identity, all workers are at risk.
This week, the Senate will begin debate on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would simply afford all Americans the same protections from discrimination based on prejudice. In fact, four out of five Americans mistakenly believe these protections already exist.
Two-thirds of Americans including a majority of Republicans support federal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace. But once again Republicans in Congress are out of step with Republicans in the rest of the country. House Speaker John Boehner said today that he does not support this legislation. But the Speaker should take his cue from the 56 percent of Republicans nationwide who support ENDA, and bring this legislation up for a vote.
Corporations also agree non-discrimination policies are good for business. Most Fortune 500 companies already prohibit this kind of persecution. And more than 100 of the nations largest businesses; more than 80 national civil rights, labor, religious, civic and professional organizations; and faith leaders from many denominations have spoken out in support of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
But theres a more important reason to support this legislation than popular support: its the right thing to do. Harvey Milk, the murdered California politician and gay rights activist, once said: It takes no compromise to give people their rights It takes no money to respect the individual. It takes no political deal to give people freedom. It takes no survey to remove repression. All Americans regardless of what they look like, where they live, or who they choose to love deserve to be treated with the same respect and dignity while they earn a living. And employees should be judged on the quality of their work, on their talents and on their performance, not on their sexual orientation or their gender identity.
I urge my colleagues to vote with me tonight to begin debate on a bill that would affirm the equal rights and freedoms of every American, and to do so simply because it is the right thing to do.
http://democrats.senate.gov/2013/11/04/reid-remarks-on-the-employment-non-discrimination-act/
Mass
(27,315 posts)Monday night.
Well, he can always bring it back.
Mass
(27,315 posts)Mass
(27,315 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)There is first a Senate cloture vote, then Senate debate time, then a final Senate vote.
Mass
(27,315 posts)I hope they do not have to have the whole series of vote: Motion to Proceed, cloture, vote.
The Senate cloture vote was the motion to proceed onto the debate.
Now it will be in debate for I think 30 hours unless they agree to a shorter period of time - or something like that.
When the debate time is up then The Senate will hold the final vote.
But it looks like Boehner will not bring it to the floor in The House for a vote and if he doesn't then it will just die over there as a pending bill.
Mass
(27,315 posts)there could be a vote for the MOtion for proceed and a vote for cloture for the bill itself. It depends what they agreed to.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)The next vote will be the final vote.
Mass
(27,315 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)But those are not 'cloture' votes.
Mass
(27,315 posts)Read the name of the vote; cloture on the motion to proceed
There still can be cloture to end debate.