Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bring it on, Rand Paul (Original Post) Tanuki Nov 2013 OP
It was metaphorical quinnox Nov 2013 #1
I'd love to see him go on her show gopiscrap Nov 2013 #2
Seriously people, get a grip LondonReign2 Nov 2013 #3
Good heavens, it was meant as a joke! Who was advocating shooting anyone? Tanuki Nov 2013 #6
K&R, because Juror #3 thinks that's a "crap picture." Iggo Nov 2013 #4
That photo is disturbing Brother Buzz Nov 2013 #5
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. It was metaphorical
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 12:30 PM
Nov 2013

but I don't think even back in the old days when dueling was permitted, that a man would ever challenge a woman in a duel. They would have been made a laughing stock!

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
3. Seriously people, get a grip
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:01 PM
Nov 2013

At Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:33 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Bring it on, Rand Paul
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023981952

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Isn't DU supposed to be better than this? Advocating shooting others should be a "hide".

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Nov 5, 2013, 11:11 AM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The post isn't "advocating" shooting others. Alerter needs to get a grip.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: we don't need crap pics like this posted anywhere.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Tanuki

(14,916 posts)
6. Good heavens, it was meant as a joke! Who was advocating shooting anyone?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:18 PM
Nov 2013

I don't think Rachel was advocating shooting anyone when she posed for the "crap" picture, either, for that matter. Well, as far as I know that was the first time in my 9 years here that any of my posts have been alerted on, so thanks for the laugh!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bring it on, Rand Paul