Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,984 posts)
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 11:29 AM Nov 2013

Serial plagiarism is the very definition of "intended to mislead."

Paul, a likely candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, also said he is sensitive about his character being questioned. “What makes me mad about the whole thing is that I believe there is a difference between errors of omission and errors of intention,” he said. “We aren’t perfect and we have made errors of omission, but we never intended to mislead anybody.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/363246/rand-paul-fights-press-robert-costa

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Serial plagiarism is the very definition of "intended to mislead." (Original Post) kpete Nov 2013 OP
But but but malaise Nov 2013 #1
Paul went to college. He should know very well that you're supposed to LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #2

malaise

(268,925 posts)
1. But but but
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 11:31 AM
Nov 2013

there were errors of intention - he deliberately lifted other people's words.
Rand Paul's problem is that he believes plagiarism is no big thing.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
2. Paul went to college. He should know very well that you're supposed to
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 11:37 AM
Nov 2013

give the sources for statements made by other people. That's true in speeches as well as written compositions. He thought he would get away with it and now he's playing dumb. He'll most likely get away with it, too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Serial plagiarism is the ...