Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,881 posts)
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 09:38 PM Nov 2013

Creationists turn against Pat Robertson for saying Earth isn’t 6,000 years old

In the video embedded below, “Creation Today” hosts Eric Hovind and Paul F. Taylor asserted that “God’s word” is “the basis of all knowledge,” and that televangelist Pat Robertson is off-base in saying that perhaps the world is more than 6,000 years old.

The two hosts were discussing Robertson’s response to an email he received from a “700 Club” audience member who wanted to know why the Bible doesn’t say anything about the dinosaurs.

“Of course the Bible does cover dinosaurs,” said Taylor, “we have talked about that on this show several times.”

What Robertson said in response to the viewer, however, was that, in spite of what Creationists and Ireland’s Archbishop James Ussher [1581-1656] say, the Earth is not 6,000 years old. Ussher was a Christian cleric who claimed to have pinpointed the moment of Creation to the day.

Hoving and Taylor laughingly dismissed the idea that Ussher could be wrong in any way, with Taylor asking rhetorically of Robertson, “Do you assume then that Archbishop James Ussher had no actual evidence for his proposition when he wrote such a big book. People talk about this 6,000 years that Archbishop Ussher came up with.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/06/creationists-turn-against-pat-robertson-for-saying-earth-isnt-6000-years-old/



26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Creationists turn against Pat Robertson for saying Earth isn’t 6,000 years old (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2013 OP
He should know. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #1
There's another Hovind? shenmue Nov 2013 #2
Wow. Who would have thought that Pat Robertson boston bean Nov 2013 #3
. boston bean Nov 2013 #4
LOL. "Of course the Archbishop had evidence the earth is 6000 years old". JBoy Nov 2013 #5
Hard to believe anyone could be so stupid as to believe kiranon Nov 2013 #6
A coworker who is a great engineer exboyfil Nov 2013 #7
I have a similar coworker Cresent City Kid Nov 2013 #8
well - I think your programmer friend is somewhat correct DrDan Nov 2013 #17
The expansion can be faster than the speed of light Cresent City Kid Nov 2013 #18
no - it will not speed up the light DrDan Nov 2013 #19
My point is that the light must be much older than 6000 years. Cresent City Kid Nov 2013 #22
I certainly agree with that DrDan Nov 2013 #23
I hear you Cresent City Kid Nov 2013 #24
Some people operate with two sets of mental furniture undeterred Nov 2013 #25
...and while you read the big book Taylor, I'll tell the people about the all new "Meal-o-Matic"... BlueJazz Nov 2013 #9
Wow, when Pat Robertson comes off as the "sane" one .......... marmar Nov 2013 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Baitball Blogger Nov 2013 #11
Yeah. Remember, these people want to put that shit in public school science textbooks. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #12
Can I just add, Usher was laughed at *in his own day* Recursion Nov 2013 #13
I don't get it. To believe in a creator does not mean you have to believe the earth is 6,000 years. kelliekat44 Nov 2013 #14
A couple things. One, there's not a whole hell of a lot of critical thinking going on. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #15
It's not a kind of thinking, it's dogma ck4829 Nov 2013 #16
When you bild a zoo, you shouldnl't be surprised that there are animals in it. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2013 #20
Sigh. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #21
When you believe in the written down heat induced hallucinations of itinerant sheep herders. hobbit709 Nov 2013 #26

JBoy

(8,021 posts)
5. LOL. "Of course the Archbishop had evidence the earth is 6000 years old".
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:02 PM
Nov 2013

"Look how thick the book is!"

Also, "He got it from the bible", ergo, QED.

kiranon

(1,727 posts)
6. Hard to believe anyone could be so stupid as to believe
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:20 PM
Nov 2013

the earth was only 6,000 years old. Loved the picture of the Apple computer and the religious texts side by side. Now if they would just use the computer to learn something.

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
7. A coworker who is a great engineer
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 08:09 AM
Nov 2013

believes that the earth is 6,000 years old. It simply boggles the mind that an individual that intelligent can hold such a belief.

Cresent City Kid

(1,621 posts)
8. I have a similar coworker
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 08:31 AM
Nov 2013

A brilliant programmer, but he sounds silly trying to square science and his beliefs. He realized that a 6000 year old universe meant that light from celestial objects had to leave their sources less than 6000 years ago. He could have postulated that the universe was much smaller, but decided that since the speed of light is not always a constant, it could be sped up enough to explain the universe at its actual size.

We all remember from geometry that you can have sound logic with false assumptions: All dogs have 3 legs, Fido is a dog, Fido has 3 legs. Creationist start with the assumption that the Bible is strictly factual and bend the rest of the universe to fit.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
17. well - I think your programmer friend is somewhat correct
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:28 AM
Nov 2013

an object cannot "travel" through space faster than the speed of light - however, that does not preclude the expansion of space itself faster than that - so objects can "recede" from each other faster than the speed of light.

Cresent City Kid

(1,621 posts)
18. The expansion can be faster than the speed of light
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:53 AM
Nov 2013

but the light coming off of objects is hitting Earth after trips of billions of years for the farthest objects.The expanding space between us and the objects wouldn't speed up the light.

Cresent City Kid

(1,621 posts)
22. My point is that the light must be much older than 6000 years.
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 07:09 AM
Nov 2013

And the universe in which these events take place must also be much older.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
23. I certainly agree with that
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 08:13 AM
Nov 2013

I was just responding to this - "since the speed of light is not always a constant, it could be sped up enough to explain the universe at its actual size."

Cresent City Kid

(1,621 posts)
24. I hear you
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 08:32 AM
Nov 2013

That assertion was my friend's mental gymnastics. A 6000 year old universe at its actual size would require light to be much faster than the speed measured by scientists. It does vary from this constant but only downward.

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
9. ...and while you read the big book Taylor, I'll tell the people about the all new "Meal-o-Matic"...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:01 AM
Nov 2013

...which (thru the grace of God)..cooks food by using the "Holy Heat Waves"

marmar

(77,067 posts)
10. Wow, when Pat Robertson comes off as the "sane" one ..........
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:05 AM
Nov 2013

....... you must be totally f**king whackadoodle.




Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
12. Yeah. Remember, these people want to put that shit in public school science textbooks.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:10 AM
Nov 2013

It absolutely IS a political issue.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
13. Can I just add, Usher was laughed at *in his own day*
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:14 AM
Nov 2013

Also, Darwin did not introduce the idea of gradual changes of species over millions of years; his theory instead explained the observed phenomenon of gradual changes of species over millions of years.

 

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)
14. I don't get it. To believe in a creator does not mean you have to believe the earth is 6,000 years.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:20 AM
Nov 2013

What kind of thinking is this? What kind of god or creator do these people worship?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
15. A couple things. One, there's not a whole hell of a lot of critical thinking going on.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:34 AM
Nov 2013

Two, they can't just believe in any "creator" (I don't, personally, but plenty of people do and are still able to reconcile that belief with scientific fact) ... they have boxed themselves into a very narrow literal interpretation of the Bible which means everything about 6 days and the garden of Eden and Cain and Abel and Noah's Ark has to be literally true.

Which, by their math, necessitates a 6,000 year old Earth.

I don't fucking understand it, but it frightens me that these people are anywhere near public school textbook committees.

ck4829

(35,042 posts)
16. It's not a kind of thinking, it's dogma
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:03 AM
Nov 2013

If your POV and my POV don't match up, then your point of view must be skewed or biased... If science and what I believe don't mesh, then science must be wrong... I have a laundry list of beliefs, and if you don't share them, then you must have been indoctrinated by the atheists/gays/liberals/secular humanists/etc.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
20. When you bild a zoo, you shouldnl't be surprised that there are animals in it.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 12:44 PM
Nov 2013

Didn't something he purports to believe in say, "As you reap so shall yee sow," or something like.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
21. Sigh.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:23 PM
Nov 2013

It must be tough to live in a universe that so glaringly does not match the contents of one's own head. It explains a lot of the angst, anger, and bat-shit nuttiness of a lot of people.


If only the world would conform to their preconceived notions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Creationists turn against...