Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyTheDog

(6,837 posts)
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:18 AM Nov 2013

What people REALLY mean when they say "wait times will increase" under Obamacare

Of all the arguments made against universal health care arguments, the one that bothers me the most is "wait times will increase."

What people are really saying there is this:

"My health insurance gives me easy access to a doctor that other people don't have. If those people get access to affordable care, they might try to make an appointment to see my doctor and I have a problem with that. Screw the health of other people, I want my appointments sooner, even if other people are more sick than I am."

It's a fundamentally selfish talking point.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What people REALLY mean when they say "wait times will increase" under Obamacare (Original Post) LuckyTheDog Nov 2013 OP
We Have Become A Largely Sel Absorbed And Selfish Country. TheMastersNemesis Nov 2013 #1
And when have you visited a doctor nykym Nov 2013 #2
Is that like going to the ER and waiting 3 or 4 hours to be seen? sinkingfeeling Nov 2013 #3
Some many, they will actually drop - from "forever" to "around 20 minutes". Scuba Nov 2013 #4
yup I grew up in a universal health care nation gopiscrap Nov 2013 #5
be ready alc Nov 2013 #6
Ah, yes, the "concierge" doctor. JayhawkSD Nov 2013 #11
"Waah, my elective surgery might happen later now because someone who needs it now is here!" ck4829 Nov 2013 #7
Pretty much all the talking points are selfish ones. JayhawkSD Nov 2013 #8
Hmmm...wanting insurance is a selfish thing. Gotcha. ret5hd Nov 2013 #10
I didn't say that. JayhawkSD Nov 2013 #12
I want food: not selfish ret5hd Nov 2013 #13
Unless of course, it denies that same need to someone else. LanternWaste Nov 2013 #16
Apparently you don't see the difference. JayhawkSD Nov 2013 #18
Who do these people think they are? Zambero Nov 2013 #9
You nailed it! freshwest Nov 2013 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #15
No one should waste their time sitting in a Dr's waiting room excessively. One_Life_To_Give Nov 2013 #17
In England, wait times were not bad at all OwnedByCats Nov 2013 #19
Demand drives staffing...If providers have confidence in demand forcasts HereSince1628 Nov 2013 #20

alc

(1,151 posts)
6. be ready
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:40 AM
Nov 2013

The media will be finding all sorts of people who can't get a doctor's appointment and who have to wait weeks or months for surgery. I guarantee you the republicans will find someone who dies before they get surgery and puts their family on TV 24/7 for a few days.

The real problem is that the ACA does NOT give people equal access to doctors - only to ACA policies. Different policies have access to different hospitals/doctors. And some doctors have already said they will start operating on cash rather than insurance. If they have success, there's likely to be more of that happening and we'll be back to where "the masses don't have access to my doctor".

I know of one doctor where the "preferred-customer waiting list" (those who pay $3000/year upfront) is shorter than the wait list for anyone else. He hopes to not have to see anyone other than "preferred customers". For that $3000 you get a free checkup but insurance pays full price for everything else (or you pay cash. the $3000 isn't some type of pre-payment - he keeps it in addition to charging for services).

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
11. Ah, yes, the "concierge" doctor.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:55 AM
Nov 2013

My primary doctor went that route, and I told him where he could stick his $1600 per year. $1600 for an annual physical, for which my insurance has a $0 copay. Otherwise, $1600 for the privelidge of remaining his patient. Yeah, right.

I am quite happy with my new primary doctor.

ck4829

(35,039 posts)
7. "Waah, my elective surgery might happen later now because someone who needs it now is here!"
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:43 AM
Nov 2013

Their argument in a nutshell.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
8. Pretty much all the talking points are selfish ones.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:49 AM
Nov 2013

I'm not saying Obamacare is a bad thing, but most of the support I read is along the lines of,

"Obamacare is good because I got health insurance for $135/month"
"Woman opposed Obamacare until she discovered exchange offered policy for less money."
"Obamacare is good because I can finally get insurance."


Opposition seems to be much the same,

"Obamacare is bad because the policy I liked was cancelled."

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
12. I didn't say that.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 12:01 PM
Nov 2013

Why do people keep putting the worst possible interpretation on things that are said?

Obama care is a good thing for dozens of reasons. There's nothing wrong with wanting insurance, but making Obamacare about one's self, making it about the personal benefit that accrues to "me, me, me," is selfish.

Saying "Obamacare is good because it provides insurance for millions of people, one of whom is me" would be laudable. Saying "Obamacare is good because it provides insurance for me" is selfush. Do you see the difference?

ret5hd

(20,483 posts)
13. I want food: not selfish
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 12:34 PM
Nov 2013

I want shelter: not selfish
I want security: not selfish

I want my fill of food and you can have the leftovers: selfish
I want warm dry and sanitary shelter and you can go to the homeless shelter dorm or cardboard box: selfish
I want security and you can fend for yourself: selfish

Do you see the difference? The mere fact that a person thinks of what they personally need does not indicate selfishness.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
16. Unless of course, it denies that same need to someone else.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 01:15 PM
Nov 2013

"The mere fact that a person thinks of what they personally need does not indicate selfishness..."

Unless of course, it denies that same need, whether directly or indirectly to someone else.

 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
18. Apparently you don't see the difference.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 10:44 AM
Nov 2013

Let's see if one more try will do it.

"I want shelter: not selfish" Absolutely, but "this legislation is good because it provides me shelter" is selfish.

"I want security: not selfish" Absolutely, but "this legislation is good because it provides me security" is selfish.

"I want my fill of food and you can have the leftovers: selfish" Yes, but what has that got to do with the discussion? It might if anyone was claiming that "I have insurance so the ACA should not have been passed," but that has never been part of this discussion.

"I want warm dry and sanitary shelter and you can go to the homeless shelter dorm or cardboard box: selfish" Again, no one in this discussion is claiming the anyone should go without insurance.

"I want security and you can fend for yourself: selfish" And for the third time, no one is arguing against the ACA.

Zambero

(8,962 posts)
9. Who do these people think they are?
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:49 AM
Nov 2013

As a fine upstanding X-tian, I'm entitled to immediate access to my physician. Why don't these wretched upstart patients wanting to schedule time to see my doctor just stay home and die!

Response to LuckyTheDog (Original post)

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
17. No one should waste their time sitting in a Dr's waiting room excessively.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:46 PM
Nov 2013

At the Student Clinic way back when. They didn't really take appt's and you could be waiting over an hour to be seen. We were students so we put up with it. These days I find that it depends alot on where you go. The wife's Dr is at what I call the Cattle medical center. Patients are treated like it's a stockyard with long wait times. Maybe you can book an appt. with your primary care 6-10 mo's in advance and hope it isn't cancelled. A PA might be seen within several days if it's more urgent. And Emergency might only be backed up for a few hours. Yet for my own Primary Care two days would be a long time for an urgent case. More importantly to me I can schedule appt's middle of day with minimal time away from the office to attend to whatever is needed. No unpredictable wait times etc.

The first couple months it might be hectic with an influx of patients who have been holding off tests and/or treatment. But in the end the system should adjust and bring times to normal. If people stopped patronizing places that treat them like livestock then we might get more patient oriented care everywhere.

OwnedByCats

(805 posts)
19. In England, wait times were not bad at all
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 11:02 AM
Nov 2013

Seeing my doctor was no problem, I never really had to wait more than a day, and that's if I missed the morning walk in hours, which wasn't very often. He always returned my phone calls within 2 hours and he did house calls! I cannot get that kind of service here, at least in my neck of the woods. I would be damn lucky if my doctor bothers to call me back at all! Then when she does it's rarely the same day. And house calls, NEVER in a million trillion years! I had to see a neurologist there and here .... guess where I had to wait the longest? You guessed it, here! Over there it was 2 months, here it was 4, and that was LONG before the ACA even got started. Wait times I'm sure will increase, but hopefully that's only temporary. The one thing everybody in England told me wait times were the longest was hip replacements. Yeah they might have to wait 6 months, but they will get it done and not owe anything outside their national insurance tax and small copays for scripts, and that's a bargain compared to what insurance companies charge here, even the cheaper rates on the exchange. Oh I did have to wait 2 months to have my very painful impacted tooth removed by an oral surgeon as my dentist would not touch it. However, they kept me pain free in the meantime by not depriving me of good pain killers. Over here it would be easier to buy the damn things on the street than get a script from your doctor - well, at least where I live.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
20. Demand drives staffing...If providers have confidence in demand forcasts
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 11:19 AM
Nov 2013

There is no reason they should not expand staff and facilities accordingly. More patients still means more fractions of cash to the profit side.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What people REALLY mean w...