Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:37 AM Nov 2013

Sanford police backtrack on neighborhood watch gun restriction

Police in the Florida city where George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin have backed off a plan to explicitly ban neighborhood watch volunteers from carrying guns while on duty.

Earlier this month, police in Sanford, Florida, announced new rules on how civilian patrols can operate in an attempt to revive the program's reputation, and was expected to announce Tuesday that neighborhood watch volunteers shouldn’t carry guns or follow suspects.

But now the police department has backtracked on those rules, saying that while it recommends that neighborhood watch volunteers not carry weapons, it won't formally prevent volunteers from doing so.

...

In a phone interview on Wednesday, Sanford Police Chief Cecil Smith refused repeated requests to explain the reversal.

"That was the choice of the chief. That was my decision," Smith said. "What my thought is unimportant."


http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/11/7/sanford-police-reverseneighborhoodwatchgunban.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanford police backtrack on neighborhood watch gun restriction (Original Post) The Straight Story Nov 2013 OP
Idiots. nt MADem Nov 2013 #1
Fucking NRA got to them huh? gopiscrap Nov 2013 #2
It was a legal challenge waiting to happen... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #3
How so? Chan790 Nov 2013 #4
HOAs are not public law enforcement officials or Government seveneyes Nov 2013 #8
Wait a minute... sarisataka Nov 2013 #5
Naturally!! Get ready, Sanford, for "Zimmie v2.0". bullwinkle428 Nov 2013 #6
Maybe they can instead compel Neighborhood Watch volunteers Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #7
 

Decaffeinated

(556 posts)
3. It was a legal challenge waiting to happen...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:40 AM
Nov 2013

... And a potential source of liability.

They just didn't want to spend the resources on t and lose.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
4. How so?
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 11:45 AM
Nov 2013

Most neighborhood watch programs explicitly forbid members/volunteers from carrying firearms on patrol.

"Generally Accepted Best Practices" is a strong defense in any liability suit or court challenge, barring other circumstances.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
8. HOAs are not public law enforcement officials or Government
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 12:41 PM
Nov 2013

The HOAs can "fire" anyone that breaks their rules.

sarisataka

(18,483 posts)
5. Wait a minute...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 12:06 PM
Nov 2013
In a phone interview on Wednesday, Sanford Police Chief Cecil Smith refused repeated requests to explain the reversal.

"That was the choice of the chief. That was my decision," Smith said. "What my thought is unimportant."

... isn't HE the chief?

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
7. Maybe they can instead compel Neighborhood Watch volunteers
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 12:34 PM
Nov 2013

to NOT view all black men walking down the sidewalk as fuckin' criminals to be questioned/detained/apprehended/shot...

That would be a step in the right direction...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanford police backtrack ...