Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,005 posts)
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:09 PM Nov 2013

Man convicted of sex with girl, 5, to get new trial

CARSON CITY — A Las Vegas man sentenced to two consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole after he was convicted of lewdness and having sex with a minor is getting a new trial.

The Nevada Supreme Court on Thursday ruled Jack F. Gilliam did not get a fair trial because of a series of errors committed at his trial.

In a unanimous decision, the court said that “while we acknowledge that a defendant is not entitled to a perfect trial ... this trial was so imperfect as to render it unfair.”

...

The girl said that beginning in 2006, when she was 5, Gilliam sexually abused her three times a week during four summer seasons when she was out of school and visited him, according to court records.

She said she begged him to stop, but he told her to keep quiet, according to court records.

...

The only evidence against Gilliam was the testimony of the girl. There was no physical evidence.

And the girl’s brother, who had slept beside her during much of the alleged abuse, did not wake or see any of the sexual misconduct, even when the girl said she screamed or struck Gilliam, according to court records.

full: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/nov/07/man-convicted-sex-minor-get-new-trial/

Did the state high court make the right decision, given that these types of crimes are often witnessless, and the safety of children tends to appeal more to most people than the perp's constitutional right to a fair trial.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man convicted of sex with girl, 5, to get new trial (Original Post) alp227 Nov 2013 OP
"Did the state high court make the right decision" jberryhill Nov 2013 #1
Ugh. 5 yr olds can't 'have sex with' anyone leftstreet Nov 2013 #2
My sentiments exactly. "Rape", lets call this for what it is. Nt Barack_America Nov 2013 #3
Yes, it shows a horrendous misunderstanding that sex and rape are the same BainsBane Nov 2013 #5
+1000 Liberal_in_LA Nov 2013 #6
There must have been some medical evidence BainsBane Nov 2013 #4
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
1. "Did the state high court make the right decision"
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:14 PM
Nov 2013

Absent the actual decision, on what basis could anyone possibly answer that question?

leftstreet

(36,098 posts)
2. Ugh. 5 yr olds can't 'have sex with' anyone
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:19 PM
Nov 2013

It's assault. They can't consent. It's a crime

(The article's fault, not yours)

BainsBane

(53,012 posts)
5. Yes, it shows a horrendous misunderstanding that sex and rape are the same
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:29 PM
Nov 2013

When that is far from the case.

BainsBane

(53,012 posts)
4. There must have been some medical evidence
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 09:28 PM
Nov 2013

Perhaps not enough to sustain a legal conviction, but surely they could tell the child had been violated.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Man convicted of sex with...