Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 01:32 PM Nov 2013

Uh huh. Yeah, sure.

10/29/2013

Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, predicted Tuesday that things could get ugly if Republicans block a vote this week on one of President Barack Obama's key judicial nominees, Patricia Millett.

The pressure to change Senate rules and strip Republicans of their power to filibuster certain judicial nominees "would be almost insurmountable" if Republicans block Millet's confirmation vote to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Leahy said at an event advocating Millett, currently a Supreme Court appellate attorney.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has already threatened to invoke the so-called nuclear option if Republicans don't let at least one of Obama's D.C. Circuit nominees get a vote. Millett, who will come up for a vote as soon as Thursday, is the first of Obama's three D.C. Circuit nominees to hit the Senate floor. Nina Pillard cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee and is ready for a floor vote, while Robert Wilkins is set for his committee vote on Thursday.

<snip>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/29/patrick-leahy-filibuster_n_4175656.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2014

guess what happened 3 days later? Yep. the rethugs blocked Millett. guess what the dem response was? Yep. Nothing.

they blocked Watts to head the FHA too.

So don't hold your breath for anything to change- or for this to get much media exposure

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uh huh. Yeah, sure. (Original Post) cali Nov 2013 OP
Wolf! AndyA Nov 2013 #1
lol. cali Nov 2013 #4
... PoliticAverse Nov 2013 #2
Harry, either shit or get off the pot. Scuba Nov 2013 #3
For a long time I've wondered if the Democrats really don't want to get anything done LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #5
invoking the nuclear option would certainly get obamacare off the front pages scheming daemons Nov 2013 #6
What would it cost the Dems to change the rules and not allow rock Nov 2013 #7

AndyA

(16,993 posts)
1. Wolf!
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 01:33 PM
Nov 2013

Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf! Wolf!

LuvNewcastle

(16,835 posts)
5. For a long time I've wondered if the Democrats really don't want to get anything done
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 01:44 PM
Nov 2013

and the GOP is a convenient excuse to do nothing. When people keep saying over and over that they're going to do something and then they break their word again and again, why should I believe anything they say?

rock

(13,218 posts)
7. What would it cost the Dems to change the rules and not allow
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:51 PM
Nov 2013

the virtual (logical?) filibuster? Meaning that to filibuster the repiggies would actually put in some effort. Oh yeah, when the shoe was on the other foot, so would the Dems. Oh wait, they practically never filibuster!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Uh huh. Yeah, sure.