Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:42 PM Nov 2013

"Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population"

"Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction."

From a 1948 memo by John Kennan, highlighted by Chris Hedges in his excellent interview on TRNN, part 1 below and all parts here.

Do you think it's appropriate that, let's put it broadly, western governments and corporations use all of our economic and much of our military might to maintain that disparity, knowing that the wealth generated and protected is distributed very unequally in our own societies?

#t=827

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population" (Original Post) BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 OP
It's not right or just or fair. PDJane Nov 2013 #1
and nearly all of THAT is in the hands of the top 10%... Deep13 Nov 2013 #2
some 150 transnational corporations controlling 60% of all profits BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #5
Why do they say 'we?' Where's my share? leftstreet Nov 2013 #3
It was entitely reformed away BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #4

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
1. It's not right or just or fair.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:48 PM
Nov 2013

It's the kind of thing that is the downfall of civilizations. This one will be no exception.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
2. and nearly all of THAT is in the hands of the top 10%...
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:56 PM
Nov 2013

...with the top 1/2% controlling the bulk of it.

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
5. some 150 transnational corporations controlling 60% of all profits
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 06:05 PM
Nov 2013

through owning 40% of the economy, IIRC from a recent study.

I very much liked the 1 vs 99 idea of OWS, but it's really more the 0.01 or an even smaller percentage vs the 99.99%

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
4. It was entitely reformed away
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 06:02 PM
Nov 2013

bad attempt at word joke, but you get the idea.

Imagine, of all the creatures on this planet, we are the only ones that have to pay for living on it, and usually toil a lifetime in order to pay our "dues".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Furthermore, we hav...