General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo Lara Logan of 60 Minutes was getting
some of her information from the liar. She didn't get any information from the FBI apparently. So who were her other sources? And do we have a right to know? Was it the GOP?
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)applegrove
(118,020 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 9, 2013, 04:38 AM - Edit history (1)
have used more than one source to confirm the story.
Trekologer
(994 posts)The question that "60 Minutes" didn't answer was which story was the lie? They accepted the liar's tale that the story he was giving him wasn't the lie, which was another lie.
Moral of the story: lying liars lie. And lying liars lie about lying.
Atman
(31,464 posts)If they rely on reading third-party, outside sources instead of actually INVESTIGATING! It appears as if the depth of their "reporting" was to have some guy sit and tell them a story.
Remember the old days of 60 Minutes when Mike Wallace and a camera crew would show up at a crook's door with proof that he was a crook, and put his feet to the fire? Now they just do fluffy human interest stories and cross-promotional deals for books and movies they're hawking.
spanone
(135,635 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)The USA doesn't need people like that working in other countries. Who knows he could have been behind the small attack and fire at that building. The fire that gave the ambassador smoke inhalation that killed him.