Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDan Rather......was never a liberal or a democrat.
Just a news guy trying to do his job....It amazes me that the guy never went after CBS (Bush Story) or even has a comment on the the current scandal over the 60 minute piece..
Ill never forget that back on election eve.. Rather was on MSNBC stating that he would not be surprised if Romney won.. Pissed me off.
No friend of ours!! Just a typical MSM guy who was forced to hang with us.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1366 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dan Rather......was never a liberal or a democrat. (Original Post)
busterbrown
Nov 2013
OP
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)1. I never took Rather as a liberal or progressive...
His comments that he felt, in his gut, that Romney would win really made me scratch my head.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)2. if you don't know Rather's career...
....you might want to read up on it.
We owe him a debt of gratitude for going after Bush the elder, too.
Uncle Joe
(58,295 posts)3. To my way thinking this what every "news guy or gal" should be trying to do, for the sake of our
democratic republic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Cronkite
Cronkite was a vocal advocate for free airtime for political candidates.[8] He worked with the Alliance for Better Campaigns[8] and Common Cause,[9] for instance, on an unsuccessful lobbying effort to have an amendment added to the McCain-Feingold-Shays-Meehan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2001 that would have required TV broadcast companies to provide free airtime to candidates. Cronkite criticized the present system of campaign finance which allows elections to "be purchased" by special interests, and he noted that all the European democracies "provide their candidates with extensive free airtime."[61] "In fact," Cronkite pointed out, "of all the major nations worldwide that profess to have democracies, only seven just seven do not offer free airtime"[61] This put the United States on a list with Ecuador, Honduras, Malaysia, Taiwan, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago. Cronkite concluded that "The failure to give free airtime for our political campaigns endangers our democracy."[61] During the elections held in 2000, the amount spent by candidates in the major TV markets approached $1 billion. "What our campaign asks is that the television industry yield just a tiny percentage of that windfall, less than 1 percent, to fund free airtime."[61]
Thanks for the thread, busterbrown.