Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEthanol rises above partisanship
Published Monday, November 11, 2013 at 12:30 am / Updated at 1:05 am
By Joseph Morton
WASHINGTON Two Iowa congressmen are setting aside ideological differences to wage a united fight in defense of the corn-based ethanol industry, an economic engine in the Hawkeye State.
Coming from the left is Rep. Bruce Braley, a Democrat from eastern Iowa who is running for the state's open U.S. Senate seat. From the right is Rep. Steve King, an outspoken hard-line conservative from northwest Iowa with a history of making provocative comments.
The pair will appear together Tuesday at a Capitol Hill event hosted by Iowa State University's Bioeconomy Institute.
That session will feature experts on the current state of biofuels, including production and consumption, supply and demand, market conditions and other aspects. The goal is to blunt gathering momentum for reductions in the Renewable Fuel Standard, the federal mandate that oil companies blend a certain amount of biofuels every year into the gasoline supply.
FULL story at link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 963 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ethanol rises above partisanship (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Nov 2013
OP
Laelth
(32,017 posts)1. I read the last line of the OP as follows ... FAIL story at link.
btw, the link is missing.
Ethanol subsidies are a failure, and they need to go.
-Laelth
hatrack
(59,583 posts)7. Or, to rephrase the headline, "Money Rises Above Partisanship"
Twas ever thus . . .
Couldn't agree more. It's also terrible for your engine. If it's avoidable, don't use it in your motorcycle, car, lawn mower, etc.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)2. All I know is, ethanol is hard on carburetors on 2 cycle motors!
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)3. "...an economic engine in the Hawkeye State."
Considering what I've heard it does to other people's mechanical engines they should pray they receive a gentler fate.
madville
(7,408 posts)4. All about money and gaming the system
Subsidies, higher food prices, rigging the system for the farming cartels, sounds awesome.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)5. Mutant BioFool, Inc.
IADEMO2004
(5,554 posts)6. Link to story
http://www.omaha.com/article/20131111/NEWS/131119845/1685#ethanol-rises-above-partisanship
Ethanol subsidies ended Jan 2012, mandate continues.
cut
That session will feature experts on the current state of biofuels, including production and consumption, supply and demand, market conditions and other aspects. The goal is to blunt gathering momentum for reductions in the Renewable Fuel Standard, the federal mandate that oil companies blend a certain amount of biofuels every year into the gasoline supply.
Oil companies have lobbied furiously to get relief from the requirements, arguing that the standard is outdated and eventually calls for unreachable levels of ethanol usage. It appears that they have made some headway.
The current requirement stands at 13.8 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol for 2013. Instead of increasing that level next year as planned, the Environmental Protection Agency is contemplating reducing the requirement to 13 billion for 2014, Reuters has reported on the basis of leaked EPA documents.
Lawmakers from the oil producing Gulf Coast region also are looking at legislation to roll back the requirements
end
Ethanol subsidies ended Jan 2012, mandate continues.
cut
That session will feature experts on the current state of biofuels, including production and consumption, supply and demand, market conditions and other aspects. The goal is to blunt gathering momentum for reductions in the Renewable Fuel Standard, the federal mandate that oil companies blend a certain amount of biofuels every year into the gasoline supply.
Oil companies have lobbied furiously to get relief from the requirements, arguing that the standard is outdated and eventually calls for unreachable levels of ethanol usage. It appears that they have made some headway.
The current requirement stands at 13.8 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol for 2013. Instead of increasing that level next year as planned, the Environmental Protection Agency is contemplating reducing the requirement to 13 billion for 2014, Reuters has reported on the basis of leaked EPA documents.
Lawmakers from the oil producing Gulf Coast region also are looking at legislation to roll back the requirements
end
edhopper
(33,543 posts)9. As Krugman has said,
if the first primary vote was in New Jersey instead of Iowa, Diners would get subsidies instead of Corn.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)10. Eliminate farm subsidies.