Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:16 PM Nov 2013

Supreme Court lets stand ruling striking down Oklahoma ultrasound law

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court is declining to revive Oklahoma's strict ultrasound law for women seeking abortions.

The justices said Tuesday they will let stand a state Supreme Court ruling that struck down the 2011 law passed by Oklahoma's legislature.

The measure required women seeking abortions to have an ultrasound exam and then have the image placed in front of them while the provider described the fetus.

Last week, the justices opted to let stand an Oklahoma court decision that struck down a separate law restricting drug-induced abortions.

http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/231571661.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court lets stand ruling striking down Oklahoma ultrasound law (Original Post) joeybee12 Nov 2013 OP
Kicking so this stays visible! joeybee12 Nov 2013 #1
Is good news Kber Nov 2013 #2
Good! JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #3
trying to find the vote breakdown rurallib Nov 2013 #4
Kick in hopes you post it when they list it! Thanks nt riderinthestorm Nov 2013 #5
On another thread on this - one post stated rurallib Nov 2013 #6
Whew! Hekate Nov 2013 #7

rurallib

(62,379 posts)
4. trying to find the vote breakdown
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 01:31 PM
Nov 2013

looked on scotusblog but it was not posted as yet.
good news, though

rurallib

(62,379 posts)
6. On another thread on this - one post stated
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 06:16 PM
Nov 2013

that 4 votes were needed to hear the case (grant cert? - I am not sure)
- ergo the vote had to be at least 6 - 3. Still see no break down and doubt there will be any comments.
And of course this will be reapplicable to nothing else.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court lets stand ...