Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,382 posts)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 11:52 PM Nov 2013

"Senate Republicans Filibuster Judicial Nominee Who Dared To Talk About Women’s Rights"

I guess advocating for women's rights makes a judicial candidate biased and extreme in the eyes of Republicans.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/11/12/2930661/senate-republicans-filibuster-judicial-nominee-dared-talk-womens-rights/

As expected, the Senate blocked an up-or-down confirmation vote Tuesday on one of the nation’s leading women’s rights attorneys, Georgetown University law professor Nina Pillard.

Pillard is one of three nominees to the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that Republicans committed to block. Democrats have warned that if Republicans go forward with their threat and block all three nominees, they will invoke what is known as the nuclear option, and change the Senate rules with a simple majority vote. Under existing rules, 60 votes are needed to invoke cloture and overcome a filibuster. The Senate vote Tuesday evening was 56-41, meaning that Pillard’s nomination had the support of a majority of senators but was nonetheless blocked.

Two weeks ago, Senate Republicans signaled their commitment to filibustering these nominees when they similarly blocked a vote on Patricia Millett, a nominee that has garnered little particularized opposition from Republicans. Instead, Senate Republicans have cited misleading statistics to claim that judges are no longer needed to fill the three vacant seats, belying the reality that filibustering Obama’s nominees would maintain the conservative stronghold over the court that has blocked environmental regulations and issued a radical ruling that could undercut all federal labor regulation.

Filibustering Pillard, who was rated unanimously well qualified by the American Bar Association, sends an even broader message. Unlike the generalized opposition to Millett and Obama’s third nominee to the D.C. Circuit, Judge Robert Wilkins, Republicans have aimed more personal attacks at Pillard. One prominent conservative group warned of Pillard’s “militant feminism,” saying, “America can’t afford to give a lifetime appointment to a radical ideologue!” And Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) attacked a law review article in which Pillard opposed gender stereotyping in public school curricula.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Senate Republicans Filibuster Judicial Nominee Who Dared To Talk About Women’s Rights" (Original Post) TomCADem Nov 2013 OP
The block has nothing to do with her speaking about women's rights... Tx4obama Nov 2013 #1

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
1. The block has nothing to do with her speaking about women's rights...
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 12:01 AM
Nov 2013

The republicans are going to block all THREE of the current D.C. nominees.

The GOP want those three D.C. seats eliminated and NOT filled with anyone at all.

See this DU OP from May: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022914066

and this one from July: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251314684



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Senate Republicans ...