General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe problems with the ACA are not the ACA itself or even the initial problems with
the federal website.
The problems are perception, the media and democratic unity- or rather the lack thereof.
Yesterday, Dianne Feinstein signed on to Landrieu's proposed legislation that people be able to keep their insurance regardless of the ACA. Today, Merkley signed on as a co-sponsor.
http://www.oregonlive.com/mapes/index.ssf/2013/11/jeff_merkley_cosponsors_bill_t.html
Senate Democrats will hold a closed-door full caucus meeting Thursday with Obama administration officials to discuss their growing concerns with problems in the health care law, Majority Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday.
The Nevada Democrat also said that President Barack Obama called him late Tuesday night to discuss an array of issues, including the problems with the health care law and its rollout.
There are many questions about health care, and thats why tomorrow were having a full caucus
the White House is going to be there, Reid said.
The majority leader declined to say whether he would bring to the floor amendments from Democratic senators that would make changes to the Affordable Care Act. Some of the key changes being proposed even by Democrats include bills to delay the individual mandate penalty payments as well as legislation to grandfather in individuals old insurance plans that likely would get cancelled in the reformed system.
<snip>
http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/obamacare-meeting-set-for-senate-democrats-white-house-aides/
Harry Reid needs to rein his caucus in.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)babylonsister
(171,054 posts)aim their ire at insurance companies? That's probably justified; I think it depends on who one listens to and what articles they read. Perception and distortion are at play.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,402 posts)The more the Democrats in Congress freak out about it, there more of a "perception problem" there is. There is simply not going to be an easy way to implement a new massive system like this without some difficulties and Republicans have- in large part- made things 100X more difficult in a lot of ways starting with making Medicaid expansion optional, states refusing to set up their own exchanges, states harassing navigators and making their jobs harder, running ads trying to discourage young people from signing up (as laughable as the ads may be). The response to all of these concerns should be on fixing and strengthening parts of the law, not weakening it, which is what the Republicans are focused on and now that the media is pushing out sensationalistic stories and the right wing is howling about canceled insurance policies, some Democrats are starting to worry about the law becoming toxic in advance of next year's midterms and are starting to embrace some of the right-wing/MSM rhetoric and "concerns" about the law. It's an extremely disturbing/disquieting spectacle. I just hope it all eventually gets quietly fixed and we all move on to the next manufactroversy. It's amazing- and sad- that it seems like it's politically easier to go to war in this country on false/exaggerated pretenses than it is to try to reform healthcare in this country. It just aggravates and depresses me to no end...............
frazzled
(18,402 posts)But in a way, I say let them have this. These bad policies affect a relatively small number of people--and do they REALLY "like" them?
As people discover that their crappy policies don't cover a thing, they will drop them to go to the exchanges (maybe not until next year, and until they hear what their friends and neighbors are able to get). Rather than dismantling or delaying a vast part of the ACA, let this small percentage of Americans have their crap. As soon as they get really sick once, they'll be clamoring for Obamacare.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Make corrections and adjustments as you go. And if I were Democrats in the House and Senate, I'd be very skeptical of those worried-consumer phone-call, email and letter sob stories. Republicans always man the Congressional phones the most--and those ain't your voters under any circumstances, kids.
Bandit
(21,475 posts)NOBODY likes the individual mandate, including the people that came up with the idea..
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Is that there are going to be a lot of people unable to afford to use the insurance that they and the government will be paying for.
There was a poll on DU a while back about if buying a new car would cause you undue financial hardship, I was somewhat surprised at the number of posters who said it wouldn't but that explains much about why this issue gets little attention here.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The second and third options were ironic ways of saying no.
Rstrstx
(1,399 posts)The extension of the mandate I don't see why, people have until Mar 15 (NOT Dec 15 like some would have you believe). I guess if they want to extend it a month until April 15, tax day, that would be OK