Kiss'ing Racketeering Romney: An Effort by a Pro Se to Keep it Simple/not Stupid

[laserhaas]

What we have here - is a failure to communicate!

This whistleblower turned down a bribe from Mitt Romney's gang and reported them to the Department of Justice in 2001 (during the eToys bankruptcy case). Instead of arresting the fraudsters - the Dept. of [IN]Justice rallied its support of Organized Crime (probably in the hopes of doing a POTUS wannabe a favor and get rewarded when Romney handpicked that "friendly" U.S. Attorney General that Sheldon Adelson was putting up $100 million to buy).
[br]

Because Laser Haas failed English and didn't (technically) graduate from High School;
the Organized Crooks (Racketeers) - want you to let them OFF totally 'Scott Free'!

And that Ain't Right!

FACTS NOT in DISPUTE

- - - Yours truly is a victim of organized crime. And, mind you, not just any ordinary efforts in syndicated felony law breaking; but that of/by non other than Willard Mitt Romney ("Romney&quot and his Racketeering GANG. Most have forgotten the fact that Mitt is an attorney at law from Harvard.

Whereas, yours we (eToys shareholders & I) alleged -Romney has a Gang (see list of co-conspirators below) -

Romney became powerful and rich as a corporate raider;
- - - - - - - - - - and did so Illegally!

Because there's much money to be made defending the likes of Mitt; there are many an attorney, troll, stalwart, brown-nosier and other types of detractors/naysayers - who are all too willing to come out and say

"Hey - Pitten's is just a corporate raider who is ruthless and rich.
- - - - - There's nothing against the law of being a corporate raider ruthless".

Bull {c}hit is still manure - no matter how you spell and/or slice the cow pie!

Everyone is already aware that Romney lied about his tenure as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO&quot of Bain Capital. What most are not aware of - are the real reasons WHY the POTUS wannabe claims to be "retroactively" retired from Bain Capital in August 2001; back to February 11, 1999.

What is it that Romney is so scared of; that he LIED {committed PERJURY}
- - - -to the ENTIRE Country about when he was CEO of Bain Capital

- - - - - upon his federal election campaign finance form (Office of Government Ethics {"OGE"} 278 Form)?

[br]

Racketeering Co-Conspirators of Romney's

Yours Truly has the answers to why Mitt lied upon his OGE Campaign Finance 278 Form.

The (REAL) reasons are are;

1. Paul Traub
   
2. Traub's "TBF" law firm
   
3. Barry Gold (Traub's partner)
   
4. Michael Glazer (whom Gold & Traub worked with)
   
5. Greg Werkheiser (a partner of MNAT)
   
6. Colm Connolly (MNAT partner who became U.S. Attorney)
   
7. Goldman Sachs (a client of MNAT)
   
8. Morris Nichols ("MNAT&quot
   
9. Bain Capital (also a Client of MNAT)
   
10. The Learning Company (Merged by MNAT with Mattel)
    
11. Stage Stores (owned by Romney, who hired Michael Glazer, whom Barry Gold worked for with Traub)
    
12. Kay Bee (CEO was Michael Glazer)
    
13. eToys (MNAT as eToys counsel, Traub's TBF eToys creditors counsel,)
    
14. Barry Gold (Traub's confessed partner) became illegal CEO of eToys
    
15. MNAT, Traub and Barry Gold all lied about their links to Romney/Glazer/Bain/Kay bee
    
16. Glazer/Kay Bee - bought eToys (for Romney when he was CEO of Bain)
    
17. Barry Gold, MNAT and Traub did - ILLEGALLY - reduce the prices to Romney/Bain/Glazer/Kay Bee
    

[br]
It is a FACT that all of those parties are connected to each other; as per Court Docket Record Affidavits and Confessions. It is NOT in dispute that Barry Gold and Paul Traub are partners in Asset Disposition Advisors ("ADA&quot . It is CONFESSED (see U.S. Trustee Disgorge Motion of Traub's TBF for $1.6 million dollars {here} AND - Wall Street Journal July 25, 2005 article "eToys investors claims conflicts at law firm&quot .

In parts 19 & 35 of the Disgorge Motion - Federal Police (U.S. Trustee) - notes parties were "forewarned".

Then, the Disgorge Motion concludes that "Fraud on the Court" occurred!

The United States Supreme Court did RE-open a previously closed case for YEARS - of In re Hazel Atlas Glass v Hartford Empire and concluded that there are NO Statute of Limitations for Fraud on the Court by Officers of the Court.

Hartford was (eventually) punished for the fraud it did nine (9) years earlier; and the U.S. Supreme set the standard in Hazel Atlas that the Disgorge Motion reiterates appropriately the fact (in part 29) - correctly that -

{T}ampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to protect and safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Surely it cannot be that preservation of the integrity of the judicial process must always wait upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud.

[br][hr][br]

FELONY Crimes by Romney & his RICO Gang

Rico Case Law:

The defendants constitute an illegal enterprise in acts or threat of acts in violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO&quot Act of 1970. The LAW is United States Code Title 18 with Sections, 1961-1968.

One only needs two (2) separate (specific 18 U.S.C. 1961 "predicate acts&quot crimes during a long period of time; in order to successfully prosecute a Civil RICO case under Section 1961(c).

The following are particular violations; of an RICO Section 1961 "predicate acts";
which - by the way - also includes Bankruptcy Frauds!

18 USC 241: Conspiracy against Rights of Citizens:

18 USC 3: Accessory after the fact, knowing that an offense has been
committed against the United States, relieves, receives, comforts or assists
the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment.

18 USC 242: Deprivation of Rights color of law of rights protected under the
Constitution of the U.S.

18 USC 512: Tampering with a witness

18 USC 1341: Mail fraud

18 USC 1343: Wire fraud

18 USC 1503: Obstruction of justice

18 USC 1510: Obstructing of criminal investigation

18 USC 1513: Retaliating against a witness, victim or informant

18 USC 1951: Interference with interstate commerce

18 USC 1621: Perjury

18 USC 1001: Fraud
[br][hr][br]

Federal (Civil) RICO cases are also permitted to review issues of individual "STATE" Felony violations;
as long as they carry more than one (1) year in prison - upon conviction.
[br][hr][br]

SUMMING it UP!

Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang already - ARE - guilty;
because they've confessed to 35 crimes in the eToys federal case.

However,

they were not held accountable for their culpability;
because of the federal corruption of Colm F Connolly!

This plaintiff's case against Romney, is still going forward (thus far);
and - over the next few weeks - I've got a plan to shove the facts up any stalwarts butt.

They are counting on the fact that you'll fall asleep when I quote the Law. It is rather easy for them to point out the fact that "hey, the guy didn't even graduate high school - he simply does NOT understand the Law".

Bull {c}hit is still manure;
no matter who says otherwise.

Could AL Capone "retroactively" escape his acts of organized crimes?

- - - - - - - Of course NOT!

Neither should Mitt - the PITTs - Romney.

Over the next several weeks, I'm going to file - in federal court - the proofs of Romney's RICO/Gang issues of Organized Crimes. By only posting one item at a time. Then the trolls, attorneys at law, stalwarts, naysayers and all who believe it is okay to betray a client - - will only have one thing to attack.

- - - - - - - - -As it now appears tha- the Truth will stop Romney's Gang from being "Scot Free"!
[br][hr][br]

[Mnemosyne]

1. K&R, because it matters. nt

[laserhaas]

3. Thank you.

[snooper2]

2. If you keep putting in frivolous lawsuits at what point does the court starting fining you?

[laserhaas]

4. If you can't comprehend the difference between actual evidence (such as "Confessions in record")

and the word frivolous; then there is little hope of your understanding anything in our federal system of justice.

Fortunately, the Judge/Court are not hell bent to find fault with a victim;
and liberate RWNJ's -

like you are!