Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse Republicans take 47th vote to repeal Obamacare
House Republicans take 47th vote to repeal Obamacare
by Joan McCarter
Rep. Fred Upton's big dreams of having 100 Democrats abandon President Obama and Obamacare were not realized today, when just 39 Democrats, mostly vulnerable freshmen and the usual Blue Dog suspects, voted for his "Insurance Company Bill of Rights" plan, which passed 261-157. Or, as Speaker Boehner called it, a step on the road to repeal.
The White House provides this quick, graphical summary of the differences between the administrative fix President Obama announced Thursday and the Upton bill.
It's that stuff on the right that's the big problem, in particular that part about how it gives insurance companies more, new customers to sell their junk policies to. The administration's fix, and the proposals put forth by House Democrats and Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) would only allow existing policies to be renewed. House Democrats tried twice to put forward their plan. The first attempt, as a substitute amendment, was blocked by Republicans who resorted to some parliamentary trickery to prevent a vote on the amendment. Democrats offered it again as a motion to recommit, the last opportunity they had to change the bill, but failed 187-230. All but four Democrats voted for the proposal on this vote.
The important part of the administration's and the Democrats' plans (and why Republicans made sure that they failed) is that the contain consumer protections. They all require that insurers wanting to extend a customer's policy inform that customer of what they're missing out on by renewing this junk insurance. They would also require insurers to let the customers know how to find their other options on the health insurance exchange, and that they might be eligible for federal help paying for their new insurance.
As of now, it doesn't seem likely that the Senate will take up a vote on this bill, or on either Landrieu's bill or a similar one introduced by Mark Udall (D-CO). Leadership, represented by Sen. Dick Durbin is saying a legislative fix isn't needed.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/15/1255904/-House-Republicans-take-47th-vote-to-repeal-Obamacare
by Joan McCarter
Rep. Fred Upton's big dreams of having 100 Democrats abandon President Obama and Obamacare were not realized today, when just 39 Democrats, mostly vulnerable freshmen and the usual Blue Dog suspects, voted for his "Insurance Company Bill of Rights" plan, which passed 261-157. Or, as Speaker Boehner called it, a step on the road to repeal.
The White House provides this quick, graphical summary of the differences between the administrative fix President Obama announced Thursday and the Upton bill.
It's that stuff on the right that's the big problem, in particular that part about how it gives insurance companies more, new customers to sell their junk policies to. The administration's fix, and the proposals put forth by House Democrats and Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) would only allow existing policies to be renewed. House Democrats tried twice to put forward their plan. The first attempt, as a substitute amendment, was blocked by Republicans who resorted to some parliamentary trickery to prevent a vote on the amendment. Democrats offered it again as a motion to recommit, the last opportunity they had to change the bill, but failed 187-230. All but four Democrats voted for the proposal on this vote.
The important part of the administration's and the Democrats' plans (and why Republicans made sure that they failed) is that the contain consumer protections. They all require that insurers wanting to extend a customer's policy inform that customer of what they're missing out on by renewing this junk insurance. They would also require insurers to let the customers know how to find their other options on the health insurance exchange, and that they might be eligible for federal help paying for their new insurance.
As of now, it doesn't seem likely that the Senate will take up a vote on this bill, or on either Landrieu's bill or a similar one introduced by Mark Udall (D-CO). Leadership, represented by Sen. Dick Durbin is saying a legislative fix isn't needed.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/15/1255904/-House-Republicans-take-47th-vote-to-repeal-Obamacare
Bernie Sanders on junk insurance policies
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024037863
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1827 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Republicans take 47th vote to repeal Obamacare (Original Post)
ProSense
Nov 2013
OP
Laelth
(32,017 posts)1. k&r for exposure. n/t
-Laelth
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Kick! n/t
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)3. This is like
in a baseball game, where a pitcher is delaying the game by continuing to focus on picking off the runner at 1st base instead of trying to strike the batter out.