Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CatWoman

(79,295 posts)
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 02:52 PM Nov 2013

Man Buys Undeveloped Negatives, Discovers One of The Most Important Street Photographers of century

Man Buys 10.000 Undeveloped Negatives At a Local Auction and Discovers One of The Most Important Street Photographers of the Mid 20th Century

Imagine this : perhaps the most important street photographer of the twentieth century was a nanny who kept everything to herself. Nobody had ever seen her work and she was a complete unknown until the time of her death. For decades Vivian’s work hid in the shadows until decades later (in 2007), historical hobbyist John Maloof bought a box full of never developed negatives at a local auction for $380.

John began to develop the negatives and it didn’t take long before he realised that these were no ordinary street snapshots from the 50′s and 60′s — these pictures were a lot more then that. Maier’s work is particularly evocative for those who grew up in the 50′s and 60′s because she seemed to stare deep into the soul of the time and preserve the everyday experience of the people. She ventured outside the comfortable homes and picturesque residential neighborhoods of her employers to document all segments of life in and around the big city.










Before he could find her, John discovered her obituary in the newspaper of 2009 . She slipped on ice, suffered a head injury and never fully recovered. She was 83 years old when she passed away.

Here a self-portrait of Vivien



http://www.webburgr.com/vivian_maier/

103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man Buys Undeveloped Negatives, Discovers One of The Most Important Street Photographers of century (Original Post) CatWoman Nov 2013 OP
What method is used to determine ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #1
yeah. i know. mopinko Nov 2013 #2
that or documenting unique but important things arely staircase Nov 2013 #5
Perhaps also, having an authentic and unique voice of ones own. As is the case in any art form. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #31
WELL CatWoman Nov 2013 #4
given that the subjects are severely represented in photography, she by her roguevalley Nov 2013 #33
You know it when you see it.. cilla4progress Nov 2013 #10
The quantity of their photos that you own. n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #11
A really good photographer never shows their bad shots. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #12
The financial needs of the gallery displaying their work n/t Scootaloo Nov 2013 #16
I could puke at the cynicism in this subthread. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #20
+1 ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #26
As someone who studied art history, I'm happy to discuss what is and is not art, great art KittyWampus Nov 2013 #32
yes. I was a Master's student in photography and later, in ceramics. unfortunately, BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #35
Annie Leibovitz and Susan Sonntag had a celebrated argument over Eleanors38 Nov 2013 #59
lol!!! As well she should have. Her work is...breathtaking. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #61
I wonder, can modern digital cameras take B&W as well as they take color, Eleanors38 Nov 2013 #65
well, I can't imagine they have the depth of texture and BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #66
I can't either, for now... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #88
Short answer is yes. grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #69
OOoooooooooooooo! BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #73
That is b&w digital vs color digital. grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #76
Yes they can take black and white. JimDandy Nov 2013 #83
Hear, hear, BlancheSplanchnik. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #34
makes me thinknof Elizabeth Cotton, an old-time fingerpicking guitar genius. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #36
Awesome! Plenty of YouTube clips of Elizabeth Cotton and her original pickin'! NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #37
OMG! you got us some Elizabeth Cotton!! BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #40
Oh! I am so glad you brought her up. An incredible artist! Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #50
OMG! you know her!!! she's awe. some. isn't she? BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #53
! Oh yes. Now I am on a youtube musical journey! It is all good! Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #56
ohhhh yeahhhhhh! BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #60
They'll do it to anyone, on cue just for jollies. IrishAyes Nov 2013 #43
there's actually a book called The Culture of Snark BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #45
you want I should kick some snarky ass? Skittles Nov 2013 #47
oh, do NOT get my juices flowing.... BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #52
Once they write a book about it, it's toast! MADem Nov 2013 #78
I'd gladly oblige, but I'm afraid they'll keep beating me to it. IrishAyes Nov 2013 #79
+1 The compositions, in and of themselves is wondrous... Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #49
hoooooooo my god------ o. m. g. that must have been something. really something. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #58
What was also cool... my daughter, 12 years old at the time... Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #62
;) BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #67
Why, it's required. I love the twin lens reflex camera... Eleanors38 Nov 2013 #57
I used a Mamiya Twin Lens Reflex in the 60's womanofthehills Nov 2013 #87
I had a Mamiya C330 way back when until it got stolen... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #89
Never had a Rollei, but did have Yashica D and... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #90
Someone is making money on this find Democat Nov 2013 #63
that's not the artist's fault. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #64
+1,000 MADem Nov 2013 #77
+1000 heaven05 Nov 2013 #82
Philistines abound. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #93
It's the work Stevenmarc Nov 2013 #81
cool! BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #91
Vision. Originality. View-point. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #92
wasnt a box. it was an 8' x 10' storeroom. mopinko Nov 2013 #3
There's a documentary about her: beac Nov 2013 #6
Oops and there it is!!! PatSeg Nov 2013 #8
I saw something about this somewhere else PatSeg Nov 2013 #7
Takes money to develop photos. Maybe she was a tad short shraby Nov 2013 #9
I thought about that PatSeg Nov 2013 #84
I saw the documentary about her that's currently available justiceischeap Nov 2013 #95
I think you're right PatSeg Nov 2013 #96
No, I believe I "acquired" it. It may be on YouTube now though justiceischeap Nov 2013 #98
Oh, thank you!!! PatSeg Nov 2013 #101
Watched it this morning PatSeg Nov 2013 #102
I was just reading more about her PatSeg Nov 2013 #86
this is why i collect old photographs. mostly B/W, but i will keep old color now. pansypoo53219 Nov 2013 #13
A plug for my hometown Kodak- There's Kodachrome out there that's beautiful NBachers Nov 2013 #54
A highly unappreciated nanny. gtar100 Nov 2013 #14
k&r n/t RainDog Nov 2013 #15
k&r... spanone Nov 2013 #17
What a great eye! calimary Nov 2013 #18
I have one of those! Rollieflex twin lens reflex, 2 1/4 square. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #21
I lusted after one back in my film days Major Nikon Nov 2013 #68
ohhhh yeahhhhhh! they're lustworthy, alright! BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #72
I still have an old film Nikon Major Nikon Nov 2013 #74
Brilliant, a look through here minds eye at the world around her. Historic NY Nov 2013 #19
Nothing beats a street shot. toby jo Nov 2013 #22
In high school, I did photography in assemblies for closeupready Nov 2013 #51
who can deny the genius? NJCher Nov 2013 #23
I have a good friend from the Philippines who was a nanny CatWoman Nov 2013 #24
Uh oh. Brigid Nov 2013 #25
wow! gopiscrap Nov 2013 #27
I read about this a couple of years ago Oilwellian Nov 2013 #28
bookmarking for later -- nice stuff, thanks for sharing this! KurtNYC Nov 2013 #29
What a great story. K&R IADEMO2004 Nov 2013 #30
Have been blown away by Vivian since zentrum Nov 2013 #38
In other words she just did it and moved on. Lars39 Nov 2013 #46
i wonder what became of those 5 kids JI7 Nov 2013 #39
What a wonderful discovery. NealK Nov 2013 #41
Powerful rrneck Nov 2013 #42
Ranks right up there with Dorothea Lange. IrishAyes Nov 2013 #44
Maybe I don't understand. Stonepounder Nov 2013 #48
Thank you for asking exactly what I was thinking. n/t Tansy_Gold Nov 2013 #55
Film can be either positive or negative Major Nikon Nov 2013 #71
The writer meant to say "unprinted negatives." Chef Eric Nov 2013 #80
Who gets the money? grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #70
Presumably the guy who bought the negatives for $380 Major Nikon Nov 2013 #75
Beautiful photographs! Nitram Nov 2013 #85
Interesting woman. Link to Documentary trailer made about her: Blue Diadem Nov 2013 #94
The story is relatively old now, but a good one none-the-less. ManiacJoe Nov 2013 #97
chicago cultural exhibit on VM just closed a month ago- take a peek lunasun Nov 2013 #99
Bookmarked for later WilliamPitt Nov 2013 #100
She reminds me of Emily Dickinson, in that she was a quiet and introverted person Tanuki Nov 2013 #103
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
31. Perhaps also, having an authentic and unique voice of ones own. As is the case in any art form.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:02 PM
Nov 2013

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
33. given that the subjects are severely represented in photography, she by her
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:10 PM
Nov 2013

unique vision makes her work seminal. I personally find her work to be extraordinary.

cilla4progress

(24,726 posts)
10. You know it when you see it..
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 03:35 PM
Nov 2013

I think.

The lack of grandiosity; the documentarian aspect of it; the composition and content. I love these photos and will be doing more research on her. Thank you!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
20. I could puke at the cynicism in this subthread.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 05:13 PM
Nov 2013

Wtf is it about missing the substance and looking for a quick way to go for the throat?


These pictures are beautiful and wondrous. If you take the time to feel.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
32. As someone who studied art history, I'm happy to discuss what is and is not art, great art
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:04 PM
Nov 2013

and the role of curators and mentors in securing an artist's "status".

But yeah, the cynicism…

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
35. yes. I was a Master's student in photography and later, in ceramics. unfortunately,
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:49 PM
Nov 2013

Life interferred in both instances.

But I wrote a few papers considering what constitutes Art.

Yeah, for the capital A, you kind of need to have a confluence of good karma....be productive, creation being your obsession; you must be discovered by the right person (s); you must stand out--either through talent, or extreme.

Also, it helps if you're a man and helpful if you are unburdened by life chores. A wife or other resources that free you to focus on your creation is very helpful.

Not until recently have many women had financial and family circumstances that allowed them such focus.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
59. Annie Leibovitz and Susan Sonntag had a celebrated argument over
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:50 AM
Nov 2013

Whether or not photography was art. Annie won.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
61. lol!!! As well she should have. Her work is...breathtaking.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 02:01 AM
Nov 2013

I was supposed to read Sontag's book "On Photography" for a class.

I could NOT get myself to sit and read it!!

Maybe now I could get something out of it but back then? Nuh uh.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
66. well, I can't imagine they have the depth of texture and
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 02:37 AM
Nov 2013

rich quality of silver nitrate on photographic paper! And doing darkroom work, adding deeper darks by playing with the light from tje enlarger...

I can't imagine being able to get control and beauty like that......

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
88. I can't either, for now...
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:05 PM
Nov 2013

I spent many years in the darkroom (two bath B&W was my usual process) and the dynamic range of film and paper is far greater and smoother than present digital tech. There is a depth to a B&W print that you can't get from digital original printed on a digital printer. Even a dye sublimation printer.

Does anyone do platinum printing any more?

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
83. Yes they can take black and white.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 10:42 AM
Nov 2013

Just got a beautiful black and white photo of my newly born grandchild yesterday taken by my son's digital camera.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
34. Hear, hear, BlancheSplanchnik.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:36 PM
Nov 2013

I don't know why the sour grapes about a fine artist who didn't even get to see how well here work would be received.

Sheesh.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
36. makes me thinknof Elizabeth Cotton, an old-time fingerpicking guitar genius.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 07:55 PM
Nov 2013

She played and composed in complete obscurity, busy with a large family and mothering responsibilities. She kept to herself, but thankfully was disovered and lived to make a few albums and important appearances.

Wonderful music....google her. (I'm on my mobile. Can't do the link and image display thing right now)

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
53. OMG! you know her!!! she's awe. some. isn't she?
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:31 AM
Nov 2013

By the way, a great Blackcrows tune came up on my playlist a sec ago. Yes!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
60. ohhhh yeahhhhhh!
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:57 AM
Nov 2013

You'll find others there too...I realllly like old time Apalachian banjo.

Roscoe Holcomb
Doc Boggs
Ola Belle Reed

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
43. They'll do it to anyone, on cue just for jollies.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:50 AM
Nov 2013

The snarkies took after a friend of mine recently, blowing a perfectly innocent and sweet remark all out of proportion, practically calling her a criminal. When I kicked their shins for it, they turned on me in a self-righteous fury. One of the worst dared lecture me, "Please don't call posters animals." Well, after more than enough provocation I think I said something about vultures circling. But the shoe fit.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
45. there's actually a book called The Culture of Snark
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:57 AM
Nov 2013

Which I keep forgetting I want to read.

Remind me, wouldja?

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
52. oh, do NOT get my juices flowing....
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:28 AM
Nov 2013

I'm CRAVING some snarkyass ASS KICKING myself.

Let me join you!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
79. I'd gladly oblige, but I'm afraid they'll keep beating me to it.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 09:56 AM
Nov 2013

It's a shame to have them crapping all over serious discussions. Sometimes I think they must be Rove trolls sent to harrass us. I was especially bothered when they piled on that other woman who told of a positive experience with her father's nurse. Before you know it they were actually accusing her of racism!

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
49. +1 The compositions, in and of themselves is wondrous...
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:11 AM
Nov 2013

Let alone what she chose to photograph. I love photography as an art form and this woman is an incredible artist.

I spent 7 hours at a Tina Modotti exhibit in Mexico City taking the time to feel. It was an exhilarating experience.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
58. hoooooooo my god------ o. m. g. that must have been something. really something.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:46 AM
Nov 2013

Oooo I gotta go thru some of my photograhy books from way back.

Oh man, can I remember any of my faves from back then???
YES!!!!!

W. Eugene Smith
Wynn Bullock
Diane Arbus
Julia Margaret Cameron
Mary Ellen Mark
Duane Micheals

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
62. What was also cool... my daughter, 12 years old at the time...
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 02:10 AM
Nov 2013

experienced it with me. We barely talked. Just lived it.

And yes! Time to pull the photography books down from the top shelf!

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
57. Why, it's required. I love the twin lens reflex camera...
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:42 AM
Nov 2013

a number of camera enthusiasts used them yrs ago. I believe Yashika (spl) made an affordable model.

What a huge horse!

womanofthehills

(8,698 posts)
87. I used a Mamiya Twin Lens Reflex in the 60's
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 11:33 AM
Nov 2013

-even bigger than a Yashica. Now I love love love my Canon D5 Mark 2.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
89. I had a Mamiya C330 way back when until it got stolen...
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:16 PM
Nov 2013

and I'd say it was my favorite camera of all the ones I've owned. It was heavy, so vibration was reduced, and it forced you to set up your shots properly. I also liked the viewpoint with the camera at your waist-- you were shooting "up", unlike most eye-level cameras. And the 80mm was one of the sharpest lenses I've ever owned.

After fooling around with Leicas (too expensive!) and Pentax (sharp lenses, but hard to find) and ending up with Nikon, I'm now using a D-90 and D-3200 for just about everything.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
90. Never had a Rollei, but did have Yashica D and...
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:21 PM
Nov 2013

later on the YashicaMat-124, which had a better lens and built in meter. Both were OK, and hooked me on 120/220 format, but the Mamiya 330 really blew me away.

Back then, medium format forced you to be more careful setting up your shots, and I found myself wasting a lot of film later with motorized 35mm. Just because you could.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
64. that's not the artist's fault.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 02:19 AM
Nov 2013

Not the fault either of the people who think this work is truly very beautiful, in its own right.

Profiteers are separate from that.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
82. +1000
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 10:29 AM
Nov 2013

these photos are beautiful snapshots of human life in a bygone era. The cynicism from some does not surprise me in the least.

Stevenmarc

(4,483 posts)
81. It's the work
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 10:28 AM
Nov 2013

I've seen two exhibitions of her work and when you put it in historical context with the photographers who would have been her contemporaries, she not only holds her own with them she had a distinct vision.

Of course the art world has more than its fair share of hype and certainly this is a story that's been hyped to death but the work is much stronger than the hype and that along with its place on the photographic timeline is what makes her work important.

mopinko

(70,078 posts)
3. wasnt a box. it was an 8' x 10' storeroom.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 03:16 PM
Nov 2013

he has only sorted through a little.
i saw the show at the cultural center here. the photos are really wonderful.
i think she will influence people going forward. but i don't think you can be considered important until you do that. in life or from the grave.

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
7. I saw something about this somewhere else
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 03:25 PM
Nov 2013

I wonder why she never developed the negatives.

I think I heard something about a documentary about her, but haven't seen anything.

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
84. I thought about that
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 10:42 AM
Nov 2013

but in her case I think it was more complicated. I know it wasn't uncommon for people to not develop every roll of film, but I've never heard of anyone not developing ANY of their film.

The odds are that these pictures would have just been thrown away. It is amazing that someone bought them and developed them. Makes you wonder how many treasures get tossed in the trash on a regular basis.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
95. I saw the documentary about her that's currently available
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 04:10 PM
Nov 2013

and I think her not developing had a lot to do with her having (my own diagnosis) OCD. They talked about how her room was packed from floor to ceiling with things. I think she collected photography like some people collect "stuff." I think she was compelled to take photographs and I don't think she cared whether they were seen or not. That said, we'll never really know because she was a very private woman who rarely showed her photographs to anyone when she did develop.

I'm torn about her notoriety because I think she would have hated it but I love looking at her photographs. They are so few female artists of note.

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
96. I think you're right
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 06:47 PM
Nov 2013

She might not have been comfortable about the fame, but I'm sure she'd have been more upset if the film had ended up in a landfill. But who knows, some writers and artists were quick to destroy their own creations.

Where did you see the documentary? In a theater?

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
102. Watched it this morning
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 12:07 PM
Nov 2013

and it answered a lot of my questions, though there will always be many mysteries about such a private and reclusive person.

I lived in Chicago for a few years at the same time she was there. I probably had walked past her, both of us among the many invisible who dwell in cities.

PatSeg

(47,399 posts)
86. I was just reading more about her
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 11:26 AM
Nov 2013

and actually there were developed photos as well. Perhaps she was so prolific, that she couldn't keep up with her own film, always moving on to the next picture.

pansypoo53219

(20,971 posts)
13. this is why i collect old photographs. mostly B/W, but i will keep old color now.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 03:59 PM
Nov 2013

i find them at estate sales. getting whole albums is even neater. it started w/ a bargain of an album for $5 and OMG the great shots i found in it. i just found 4 'moments'. helps to have an artists eye to see a good photo. i paid more for a late 1800's album. its amazing what can be photoshopped from an over exposed B/W photo.

NBachers

(17,103 posts)
54. A plug for my hometown Kodak- There's Kodachrome out there that's beautiful
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:35 AM
Nov 2013

I think we're at a point where the vintage Kodachrome can hold it's own against old black and white now.

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
14. A highly unappreciated nanny.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 04:03 PM
Nov 2013

The video makes her all the more fascinating.

And in answer to the guy at the end, I'm glad you didn't find the negatives first. I get the impression you care more about the money than the art.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
18. What a great eye!
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 04:26 PM
Nov 2013

Those photos! Shit! I even recognize that camera in the last shot. What a find!!!! Thanks for posting this, CatWoman!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
21. I have one of those! Rollieflex twin lens reflex, 2 1/4 square.
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 05:17 PM
Nov 2013

Was an MFA photo student looooong time ago.

That camera is great!
Haven't been into shooting for ages now.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
68. I lusted after one back in my film days
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 02:52 AM
Nov 2013

A friend of mine had a Yashica TLR I used to borrow from time to time. I would have loved to own a Rollei. It just wasn't as practical as my Nikon FM and they were quite expensive at the time so I just couldn't justify it.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
72. ohhhh yeahhhhhh! they're lustworthy, alright!
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 03:02 AM
Nov 2013

Oh goddddd I want some film and a darkroom right now ( well not NOW. It's 2 am.)

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
74. I still have an old film Nikon
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 03:07 AM
Nov 2013

I haven't shot a roll through it in about 10-15 years. All of my lenses will still work with it.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
51. In high school, I did photography in assemblies for
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:23 AM
Nov 2013

use in the yearbook and paper, and one of my favorite means of taking candids/street photos was to turn around at the assembly, i.e. NOT the object of attention but the audience, and simply take a shot - the amounts of emotion and activities going on in the crowd, in a single shot, always amazed me, after it was developed.

NJCher

(35,654 posts)
23. who can deny the genius?
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 05:49 PM
Nov 2013

In these photos?

The blonde in the first photo is thinking, "You lookin' at me?"

The joy of the kids in the penultimate photo jumps off the page.

Someone posted about her around four years or so ago (here at DU). It is nice to see what Maloof has done with her work.

Thank you catwoman! This and the LOLcats thread made my day.


Cher

oh and p.s., I have lots of nannies in my classes. Mostly students from foreign countries. This thread helps me think about their promise.

CatWoman

(79,295 posts)
24. I have a good friend from the Philippines who was a nanny
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 05:54 PM
Nov 2013

she returned home (from the Middle East) a couple years ago.

She loved her job.

I've been trying to find her since the typhoon, but to no avail

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
28. I read about this a couple of years ago
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 06:48 PM
Nov 2013

Fascinating story and wonderful pics. Vivien was very talented.

K&R

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
38. Have been blown away by Vivian since
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 09:40 PM
Nov 2013

..she was discovered.

She was an unmarried nanny, who took pictures on her day off. She never developed a single negative. Do you realize how perfect her "eye" was that she never saw any of her own work?

Lars39

(26,109 posts)
46. In other words she just did it and moved on.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 12:59 AM
Nov 2013

No reflecting on the developed picture as to how it could have been improved, no agonizing over not taking it a split second sooner or later....really amazing.

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
48. Maybe I don't understand.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 01:10 AM
Nov 2013

The photos are fantastic. I can see why they are considered important.

However, maybe I don't understand something. I used to do photography (back when people used film) and had my own darkroom. You can have undeveloped film, and you can have unprinted negatives. What is an undeveloped negative? When you 'develop' film, you use various chemicals in a dark room to create 'negatives' - meaning that looking at a developed piece of film you will see dark areas where white should be and clear areas where black should be (in black and white film). You then take the negatives and 'print' them - shine light through the negative onto photo paper. The dark areas on the negative let less light through to hit the paper, so it doesn't darken, and the light areas let more light through, to the paper darkens more. In effect reversing the negative onto a 'positive'.

So, you can have undeveloped film or unprinted negatives, but I don't know what an 'undeveloped negative' is.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
71. Film can be either positive or negative
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 02:58 AM
Nov 2013

The former is most often used for slides and the later is most often used for prints.

Chef Eric

(1,024 posts)
80. The writer meant to say "unprinted negatives."
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 10:05 AM
Nov 2013

I was wondering the same thing, but I figured it out when I clicked on the link and checked out the youtube video.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
75. Presumably the guy who bought the negatives for $380
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 03:10 AM
Nov 2013

If there are more like the examples from the web site, he's sitting on a gold mine. Medium format negatives can be blown up to gallery sized prints with quality that is better than even many modern digital cameras.

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
103. She reminds me of Emily Dickinson, in that she was a quiet and introverted person
Tue Nov 19, 2013, 12:14 PM
Nov 2013

who did not try to promote herself and whose incredible corpus of creative work was not known or appreciated in her lifetime.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Man Buys Undeveloped Neg...