General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan Democrats avoid a circular firing squad on Obamacare? The early signs aren’t promising.
Fridays vote on a Republican plan that would allow people who liked their insurance to keep it drew more than three dozen Democratic defections, the vast majority of whom sit in districts that will be targeted by Republicans in 2014. Meanwhile, in the Senate, a handful of the most vulnerable Democrats up for reelection in 2014 Louisianas Mary Landrieu is leading the charge were working on a similar effort.
All of that movement came within hours of a Thursday news conference by President Obama that was clearly aimed at calming the building political storm, particularly within his own party. Obama and his team had clearly hoped that allowing people to keep their insurance plans through 2014 if they so chose would keep Democratic defections on the Keep Your Health Plan Act in the House to a minimum and end or at least sap political energy from efforts by Democratic senators to amend the law. It did neither.
And, in the aftermath of the House vote, leading Democrats acknowledged that it was primarily politics that led to the large number of Democrats breaking with the president. The fact of the matter is about 30 of them, and Ive talked to them, were insulating themselves against sound bites, said Assistant Democratic Leader James Clyburn (S.C.) during an appearance Sunday on CNNs State of the Union.
Inherent in Clyburns statement is the fact that for Democrats in swing districts and, by extension, swing states Obamacare is a losing issue from which, for political reasons, they need to distance themselves. That mindset leads to a slippery political slope for congressional Democrats and the White House. If the politically safe vote for vulnerable Democrats becomes voting against the president on his health-care law, it raises the real possibility that Congress could wage serious efforts to unravel parts of the law. And if the law starts to collapse under its own weight, its difficult to see that being a good thing or even a neutral thing for Democrats at the ballot box in 2014.
<snip>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/11/18/can-democrats-avoid-a-circular-firing-squad-on-obamacare-the-early-signs-arent-promising/
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Slow news week, the MSM has to keep creating drama where none exists.
These are the same 30-odd electeds who live in red districts and have to cover their asses, just as they have all along.
Nothing new here.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Mass
(27,315 posts)Some want to tweak it, which is different. But the DC media can only live on conflict.
cali
(114,904 posts)and good grief, do you think Chris Cillizza is some right wing anti-Obama source?
Mass
(27,315 posts)And Cilizza is just somebody from the DC media machine. Without conflict, they stop to exist.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)But your concern is noted.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)None. There are a handful of House Democrats who have always opposed the law, but beyond them, nada. Zip. Zilch.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024051840
You beat me by about 30 seconds.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)It wasn't intentional. But it proves the point all the more.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Wasserman-Shultz's lead.
As Weigel says, the only thing to do is wait
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2013/11/democrats_and_affordable_care_act_fixes_the_party_has_no_choice_but_to_wait.html