Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DearAbby

(12,461 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:51 PM Nov 2013

We The people: Demand immediate Drug Testing of Congress

How do we know this isn't some tip of the iceberg problem. Was this individual voting while intoxicated? If so, who else? This may sound like a cutsy tit for tat, But i am fucking serious. How many are voting, important matters affecting lives, doing it BUZZED?

Booze made him do it? Mixing booze with illicit drugs? This may be more of a problem than we realize, could explain the insane behavior, no?

Is this too much to demand of our elected officials?

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We The people: Demand immediate Drug Testing of Congress (Original Post) DearAbby Nov 2013 OP
oh yeah, no pay until they pass the test and no voting on laws!!! n/t hollysmom Nov 2013 #1
Works for me. hardcover Nov 2013 #5
hoorah I totally onethatcares Nov 2013 #18
Senators and Congressmen from states that allow Dustlawyer Nov 2013 #36
feds are raiding as i type questionseverything Nov 2013 #65
Other companies would just fire your ass. Phlem Nov 2013 #30
I would also like to see breathalyzer tests octoberlib Nov 2013 #2
+1 ReRe Nov 2013 #52
This may be a tongue in cheek OP. PeteSelman Nov 2013 #3
I said I was serious. DearAbby Nov 2013 #4
Because of my stated reasons. PeteSelman Nov 2013 #7
that is fine for congress, but these people are promoting laws for drug testing everyone else hollysmom Nov 2013 #13
I totally agree. n/t R. P. McMurphy Nov 2013 #31
+ 1 absolutely Johnny Ready Nov 2013 #59
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #28
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #42
And how would you always know spartan61 Nov 2013 #45
Except that it's not private leisure time. We're talking about while on the floor of congress. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #49
I agree with you almost completely rock Nov 2013 #61
I think it is a great idea rudolph the red Nov 2013 #6
I would amend that slightly Fumesucker Nov 2013 #8
I saw your post and immediately thought Half-Century Man Nov 2013 #27
That's disgusting! erronis Nov 2013 #37
n/t ReRe Nov 2013 #53
That would be unconstitutional, as drug testing without cause by the government usually is. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #9
you are telling me that you can't look at nearly any quakerboy Nov 2013 #56
Has Congress' approval rating hit negative numbers yet? nt Buns_of_Fire Nov 2013 #10
Using RW rational...every single person sucking off the Gov't teat should be tested Sheepshank Nov 2013 #11
It's not too much to ask. Breaking laws and lying...by the people who make our laws. Avalux Nov 2013 #12
seems to be reasonable to the mayor of toronto hollysmom Nov 2013 #14
I'm going to take a somewhat different view, here. Buns_of_Fire Nov 2013 #15
Love it! Give them some automatic firearms also... erronis Nov 2013 #40
Make them blow through a tube. Conium Nov 2013 #16
We, the people demand that no one he drug tested at all without clear, specific, and articulable TheKentuckian Nov 2013 #17
well stated. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #24
Many of them are definitely boozed up. It's well known that many elected representatives Cleita Nov 2013 #19
booze and blood test azureblue Nov 2013 #20
Maybe our country is in an f'd up mess because of widespread drug abuse among congress-critters. nt silvershadow Nov 2013 #21
Why just drugs and alchohol? erronis Nov 2013 #41
True dat. I was painting with the same broad brush the right-wing uses against the poor silvershadow Nov 2013 #47
I suggest that all members of Congress, the federal judiciary and the executive branch... Swede Atlanta Nov 2013 #22
Not this person. I demand that drug testing be made illegal for all people. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #23
I agree !!! N/T thatgemguy Nov 2013 #25
This is an appropriate occupation. If congress that makes laws affecting all Americans, shraby Nov 2013 #33
K&R! ReRe Nov 2013 #26
Right on. Everybody read post 26. countmyvote4real Nov 2013 #50
F'ing AMEN! Phlem Nov 2013 #29
When the GOPers voted for the shutdown they were drunk Iliyah Nov 2013 #32
Might have been hooch, might have been terminal dumb-sheets erronis Nov 2013 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #34
I think we should start with a sanity test. nm Hawaiianlight Nov 2013 #35
k & r! great idea! n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2013 #38
Also look up their asses JEB Nov 2013 #39
Can't we just demand the same drugs they are taking, lol? grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #44
If you drive a schoolbus, you are subject to Lifelong Protester Nov 2013 #46
Its just a game nilesobek Nov 2013 #48
Hello ~ nilesobek In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #60
welcome to DU gopiscrap Nov 2013 #62
Um No thanks Egnever Nov 2013 #51
DearAbby, DearAbby... ReRe Nov 2013 #54
Yes, along with breathalyzer tests before they enter the chamber Warpy Nov 2013 #55
I would say most of them test drugs everyday! B Calm Nov 2013 #57
Considering you can't work at Home Depot without a drug test Johnny Ready Nov 2013 #58
And a Breathalyser on the floors of both houses. Ganja Ninja Nov 2013 #63
Do you mind if I use this? uponit7771 Nov 2013 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author Conium Nov 2013 #66

onethatcares

(16,165 posts)
18. hoorah I totally
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:16 PM
Nov 2013

agree.

and they have to submit to random testing whenever a constituent of their district requests it.

Yes, I support this 100%

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
36. Senators and Congressmen from states that allow
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:32 PM
Nov 2013

medical marihuana or legalize pot altogether should be allowed to smoke pot. This would sure speed up a Federal bill to legalize it!

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
3. This may be a tongue in cheek OP.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 05:59 PM
Nov 2013

But I'm anti-drug testing unless you are exhibiting signs of intoxication on the job. Otherwise it's an invasion of privacy and no one's business.

DearAbby

(12,461 posts)
4. I said I was serious.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:02 PM
Nov 2013

I felt I made that point clear. I don't feel its too much to ask they be sober while they handle laws that could adversely affect my life, or the lives of my children. Why belittle my point?

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
7. Because of my stated reasons.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:13 PM
Nov 2013

Drug testing is facsist bullshit. It's no one's business what you do in your private leisure time.

As long as you're not drunk or high at work, it's irrelevant.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
13. that is fine for congress, but these people are promoting laws for drug testing everyone else
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:45 PM
Nov 2013

why not apply the same laws to them so they can see what an invasion of privacy it is and maybe recant? I just want a level playing field.

Response to PeteSelman (Reply #7)

Response to Post removed (Reply #28)

spartan61

(2,091 posts)
45. And how would you always know
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 09:05 PM
Nov 2013

if someone is not intoxicated or high at work? Pilots and flight attendants are often randomly drug tested at the end of a flight as they walk off the aircraft. They even have to avoid eating lemon/poppy seed muffins because that could show up as a drug. I think random drug testing or a breathalyzer before a vote is an excellent idea. Why the double standard? Their votes can directly impact the American people and I don 't want a congress critter voting while under the influence. It's time for them to realize that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
49. Except that it's not private leisure time. We're talking about while on the floor of congress.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:50 AM
Nov 2013

At work. On the job.

rock

(13,218 posts)
61. I agree with you almost completely
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 11:46 AM
Nov 2013

To those who make the law, I expect a higher degree of moral authority and expect that this testing would be voluntary. Each member of Congress should be glad to show how principled he is.

(Am I being tongue-in-cheek as well? Oh, that's right the OP is serious. Well, I guess I am too.)


PS. I'm betting our guys can whip their guys pretty badly.

 

rudolph the red

(666 posts)
6. I think it is a great idea
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:06 PM
Nov 2013

they should be held to the same standards that they want ti imposr upon the rest of us.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
8. I would amend that slightly
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:13 PM
Nov 2013

Random surprise drug testing for any member of Congress who has voted for the drug war in any shape or form.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
27. I saw your post and immediately thought
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:02 PM
Nov 2013

they should be subject to random surprise body cavity searches. I'm willing to call them off if they leave women's reproductive rights alone.

erronis

(15,230 posts)
37. That's disgusting!
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:33 PM
Nov 2013

Can you imagine sticking a wand up Boner's cavities? He's probably got lots of undeclared lobbyist's "gifts" stashed away.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
9. That would be unconstitutional, as drug testing without cause by the government usually is.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:25 PM
Nov 2013

The federal courts consider a drug test a search under the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. It needs to have a warrant or at least probable cause. Random, suspicionless drug testing by government is a no-no.

Private employers are a different story. The Fourth Amendment doesn't protect you from your private boss. You need your union to negotiate drug testing policies for you. What, no union? So sorry.

quakerboy

(13,919 posts)
56. you are telling me that you can't look at nearly any
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 07:10 AM
Nov 2013

congressman's voting record and public statements and find inexplicable, erratic behavior and apparent lapses of cognitive function that might reasonably cause one to suspect on the job substance abuse?

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
11. Using RW rational...every single person sucking off the Gov't teat should be tested
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:29 PM
Nov 2013

Senators, Congress persons, contractors, employees, anyone who gets a dime of tax payer money. Personal discomfort and privacy be damned!!! If it's one, it's everyone!

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
12. It's not too much to ask. Breaking laws and lying...by the people who make our laws.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:37 PM
Nov 2013

It's not so much about drug use (they can take prescription drugs and be buzzed), it's about willfully breaking the law, since illicit drugs are illegal..and lying goes along with that.

These people are elected to serve the people, do what's in our best interest, and make laws. And blaming alcohol for using drugs as if that makes it ok?

Buns_of_Fire

(17,174 posts)
15. I'm going to take a somewhat different view, here.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 06:50 PM
Nov 2013

Give the congresscritters all the drugs they want. Hell, put free pill dispensers on the House and Senate floors, for all I care. Install booze dispensers at their seats. It's not as if it's going to markedly reduce their productivity any.

Within a few days, C-SPAN's ratings will reach the level of Comedy Central's -- especially during the times they're broadcasting debates. If Congress can't manage to work for us, at least they could provide some entertainment.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
17. We, the people demand that no one he drug tested at all without clear, specific, and articulable
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:11 PM
Nov 2013

rationales.

Tit for tat is silly. If we are demanding anything it should be for some fucking privacy of our own from the robberbarons.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
19. Many of them are definitely boozed up. It's well known that many elected representatives
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:18 PM
Nov 2013

have liquor cabinets in their offices. It's well known that the Speaker of the House, third in line for the Presidency, is an alcoholic of the non-recovering kind. I think when they are in session and actually working on the business of the people they should be tested for alcohol and drugs on a random basis if there is a suspicion of them being under the influence. When they are in their second offices raising funds for themselves they can drink and bong away for all I care, but when they are doing our business on our dime, they should have to follow the same rules the rest of us do on the job.

azureblue

(2,146 posts)
20. booze and blood test
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:19 PM
Nov 2013

no Congressman or woman should be working drunk, stoned or pilled up. There should be a breathalizer test taken every time one of them walks on the floor.

erronis

(15,230 posts)
41. Why just drugs and alchohol?
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:42 PM
Nov 2013

Most of them are addicted to power, money, and sex (booze, drugs, and fine dining seem to be prevalent also.)

Let's make sure that all these critters are non-megalomaniacs. Oh, wait - that'll eliminate all politicians.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
47. True dat. I was painting with the same broad brush the right-wing uses against the poor
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 09:33 PM
Nov 2013

and lower class folks when they are applying for benefits. I see no reason not to use this as a case-in-point for the argument that maybe we actually should drug-test congress as a condition of their holding office. I mean the job does pay well, and has great bennies- they are sucking the government teat harder than anyone collecting a few food stamps to feed their family ever did.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
22. I suggest that all members of Congress, the federal judiciary and the executive branch...
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:35 PM
Nov 2013

be subjected to drug and substance abuse (e.g. alcohol) testing at least annually. The expense of these tests must be borne by the employee.

If they test positive the results along with their photos must be broadcast on television, named on the radio and published in newspapers throughout their jurisdiction.

This might curtail the nonsense of them asking recipients of public assistance who have done nothing wrong to be tested.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
23. Not this person. I demand that drug testing be made illegal for all people.
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 07:48 PM
Nov 2013

It is a gross invasion of privacy. "Impairment testing" - non-invasive - should be allowed for appropriate occupations.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
33. This is an appropriate occupation. If congress that makes laws affecting all Americans,
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:17 PM
Nov 2013

other countries, all businesses isn't an appropriate occupation, I certainly don't know what is.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
26. K&R!
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:01 PM
Nov 2013

Well, hells bells, the Speaker of the House is a known alcoholic! Ha! I bet you if they did drug testing right now, as we speak, that the House Majority would also be the majority inebriated, be it alcohol or other mind-altering substances. Life is a beach, don't ya know, when you have an (R) behind your name and you're swimming in Corporate cash!

 

countmyvote4real

(4,023 posts)
50. Right on. Everybody read post 26.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 03:38 AM
Nov 2013

ReRe, this is as good as I can get to recommending your response.

"Life is a beach, don't ya know, when you have an (R) behind your name and you're swimming in Corporate cash!"

erronis

(15,230 posts)
43. Might have been hooch, might have been terminal dumb-sheets
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:48 PM
Nov 2013

I'm not sure what kool-aid these housers are sipping but I also suspect that the kochers are placing the nimwits in the chairs so they can more easily pull the strings.

There's nothing more irritating than spending a half-million on getting some half-brain to win a seat. And then discover that said half-wit still has a functional bit that tries to ask rational questions.

Response to DearAbby (Original post)

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
46. If you drive a schoolbus, you are subject to
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 09:24 PM
Nov 2013

random drug tests as a condition of employment. As someone up thread said, these folks are voting (when they do) on legislation that affects our lives. Yes, bus drivers are entrusted with a precious cargo every day, the lives of children.

Well, aren't these folks entrusted with matters affecting lives?

Shouldn't they be told before they are sworn in that the job comes with a random drug testing clause?

nilesobek

(1,423 posts)
48. Its just a game
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:09 AM
Nov 2013

Going in for a drug test tomorrow and knowing that I will fail because I smoke medical marijuana for various ailments, I purchased the "Quick Fix Plus." Synthetic urine. The job I am going to to apply for is very low paying with no benefits but its the only game in town. Drug test the top people in important jobs and leave us damaged and disabled people alone.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
54. DearAbby, DearAbby...
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:30 AM
Nov 2013

I read this whole thread and laughed my off.

But seriously, shouldn't we require them to make no law that they will not abide by themselves?

If employers all over America require a blood test as part of a job application, "you know who" gave them the permission to do that, don't you? I wonder about the Constitutionality of it. If we have a Constitutional person aboard DU, maybe they can jump in and explain if the law has ever been challenged.

Thanks for the timely OP!

Warpy

(111,241 posts)
55. Yes, along with breathalyzer tests before they enter the chamber
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:31 AM
Nov 2013

I would imagine most of the wingnuts are half in the bag at all times, you can't be that loony without some chemical help. I'm sure the lobbyists are supplying whatever their shriveled little hearts desire.

Johnny Ready

(203 posts)
58. Considering you can't work at Home Depot without a drug test
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 09:10 AM
Nov 2013

I am surprised congress is not tested. I assumed they were.

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
63. And a Breathalyser on the floors of both houses.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 01:58 PM
Nov 2013

Everyone is allowed to speak regardless of what they blow but the reading will be projected on the bottom of the C-span screen.

Response to DearAbby (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We The people: Demand imm...