Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 09:40 PM Nov 2013

Most children’s furniture contain toxic, flame-retardant chemicals - study

(I've been against these chemicals in Children's PJ's and in our Mattresses since the the 70's when this stuff was first introduced. To me it was always to "line the pockets" of the Flame Retardant Chemical Industry while causing harm to our kids and families with PJ's and Mattresses for Babies and the rest of us with these Cancer Causing Substances...that were supposedly to stop kids and the Rest of us from Dying in our Beds due to smoking Cigarettes or House Fire started by other circumstances. It was just more of Industry putting itself into products we use TO MAKE MONEY!

Glad to see there's some new information out there about this)


--------------

Most children’s furniture contain toxic, flame-retardant chemicals - study
Published time: November 20, 2013 23:44



Most parents would never suspect that their children could be exposed to toxic flame retardant chemicals when they sit on a Mickey Mouse couch, but our report shows that children’s foam furniture can carry hidden health hazards,” Jeff Gearhart of the Ecology Center in Michigan said in a statement about the report.

Ironically, the report includes data from the federal government that indicates the flame-retardant chemicals are not a failsafe against fire risk and can even exacerbate chances an item will burn.

The report advises against the foam-filled, chemical-treated furniture and for items made of wood, for example.

The report points to a 1975 California law that originated the flame-retardant-chemical wave that followed it across the nation and beyond.


“Flame retardants are used in children’s furniture due to an outdated and ineffective California furniture flammability standard called TB 117. This decades-old standard has failed to deliver on its promise of enhanced fire safety and instead has exposed us to a series of toxic and untested chemicals.”

Yet California is expected to implement a new rule to replace the old law on January 1, 2014, which bodes well for safer products in the future throughout the US and abroad, the report states.

“The revised standard reflects real world fire scenarios by evaluating the flammability performance of the upholstery cover fabric in combination with the underlying filling materials, and adopting rules that allow companies to make flame retardant-free products that are truly safer in fires and safer for our children and families”

Though most manufacturers are “expected” to pick up California’s rule change, it will not be required by law to make the switch for products outside of the state. California is the 12th largest economy in the world - not counting the whole of the US - by nominal gross domestic product.

“Until now, furniture makers were required to use these chemicals, and retailers were stuck selling these toxic products,” notes Judy Levin of Center for Environmental Health. “Soon, retailers will have an opportunity to show they care about children’s health by telling manufacturers they only wish to carry toxic-free furniture. Leading retailers can help ensure that children everywhere can sit on furniture without worrying about toxic chemicals.”

Over 90 percent of children’s furniture on the market is laced with flame-retardant chemicals linked to infertility, thyroid disease, neurodevelopmental problems, cancer and other illnesses, according to a new study.

The nonprofit Center for Environmental Health analyzed 42 pieces of children’s furniture containing polyurethane foam purchased at locations across the United States and Canada with the help of 14 other organizations nationwide.


Just under half of the furniture came from California, a state with strict regulations on fire safety for consumer products. The rest came from 12 states and Canada.

All furniture in the study came from major retailers, including Babies “R” Us and Toys “R” Us, Walmart, Kmart, Target, buybuy Baby and others.

MORE AT:

http://rt.com/usa/children-furniture-toxic-chemicals-049/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Most children’s furniture...