Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 03:42 PM Nov 2013

Celebration time!

Forgive me for gushing, but the Senate's decision to erode the filibuster is momentous. Its significance is beyond what most Democrats comprehend, so let me let you see what I see.

First off, the filibuster stinks. It has been a pernicious tool used by low-population states to impede progress in this country since 1787. It wasn't completely destroyed today (I wish it had been), but for the first time in decades, we weakened it, and this bodes well for the entire country.

What most Americans do not understand is that most laws are made by judges. Yes, the Constitution is the highest law of the land, but it's pretty skimpy. It doesn't cover a lot of legal ground. Statutes of the Federal Government are the next highest law of the land, and they cover a lot, but Congress can't pay attention to the minutia. They're too busy. Most laws are what we call case law, i.e. interpretations of statutes--laws made by judges. What the recent change to the filibuster rule in the Senate has allowed is for President Obama to nominate (and, presumably, get confirmation for) any judge he wants to appoint to the Federal Courts (SCOTUS excepted, as per today's rule change). I would have preferred, of course, the complete elimination of the filibuster, but I am quite happy with what we got.

This is a big deal. As an attorney, and as an officer of the Court, I am thrilled that the President now has the power to appoint liberal judges wherever and whenever he sees fit withour the need for any Republican consent. This move will have a lasting effect on our republic. Our laws will change. In the future, conservative laws will be given limited interpretation. Liberal laws, on the other hand, will be given wide latitude and will be given broad interpretation as more liberal judges are appointed by the President.

The judiciary (of which I am a part) is, theoretically, an equal branch of our government. Today, we got a rule that will allow the judiciary to become (quite quickly) much more liberal. I'm pleased as punch! Time to ...

[font size=48 color=blue]CELEBRATE![/font]



-Laelth

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Celebration time! (Original Post) Laelth Nov 2013 OP
I'm happy as hell. HappyMe Nov 2013 #1
My pleasure. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #2
Well 'sorta'... Tx4obama Nov 2013 #3
Quite true. Laelth Nov 2013 #5
That is also merely a tradition and doesn't have to be followed Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #6
Here's an article showing it's merely senatorial courtesy/custom and not a requirement Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #8
Kick for sane, if belated, rules change and Laelth's excellent analysis of same. Scuba Nov 2013 #4
Thanks for the kind words, and for the k&r. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #15
Just in case you want some music for your party. Laelth Nov 2013 #7
super-good post, laelth. Sheri Nov 2013 #9
Thanks. Glad you're joining the party. Laelth Nov 2013 #16
party, baby. Sheri Nov 2013 #21
Celebration time indeed! Cali_Democrat Nov 2013 #10
+1. Laelth Nov 2013 #17
Republicans have already found a way to F*CK up judicial nominees !!!!!!!!!! Tx4obama Nov 2013 #11
Thanks for that. I'll explore its implications more carefully tomorrow. Laelth Nov 2013 #18
It's a big fugging deal malaise Nov 2013 #12
Quite so. Laelth Nov 2013 #19
A Spine, a spine...I see a spine on Harry! brer cat Nov 2013 #13
I don't think he went far enough. Laelth Nov 2013 #20
Good times! Laelth Nov 2013 #14

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
3. Well 'sorta'...
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 03:58 PM
Nov 2013

You said: "... the President now has the power to appoint liberal judges wherever and whenever he sees fit withour the need for any Republican consent. ..."

That will be the case in the BLUE states but NOT in the red states. The Senators from 'the states' are the ones that present the president with a 'list' of folks from which the president picks the nominees.

Here's an article regarding the Texas vacancies: http://www.democraticunderground.com/107813561



Laelth

(32,017 posts)
5. Quite true.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:36 PM
Nov 2013

However, so long as one of those Senators is blue, the President will get his pick from a liberal list. Not sure whether the Red Senator can still block (as was the traditional rule), but, either way, anything that weakens the filibuster is good for us.

The Senate (by its very nature) has been a thorn in the side of progress in this nation for as long as we have had our current government (since 1787). Weakening the capacity for small-population states to obstruct progress in the Senate will be a major benefit to us all.

-Laelth

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
8. Here's an article showing it's merely senatorial courtesy/custom and not a requirement
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:45 PM
Nov 2013

Suck fuck Cruz and Cornyn. Obama should fill Texas courts with liberal judges and wath "the holy anointed one" blow a gasket.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
7. Just in case you want some music for your party.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:41 PM
Nov 2013


[font size=48 color=blue]CELEBRATE![/font]



-Laelth

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
11. Republicans have already found a way to F*CK up judicial nominees !!!!!!!!!!
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 04:55 PM
Nov 2013

Republicans have already found a way to F*CK up judicial nominees !!!!!!!!!!

Here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251340508

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
18. Thanks for that. I'll explore its implications more carefully tomorrow.
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 07:20 PM
Nov 2013

Right now, it's celebration time!



-Laelth

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
19. Quite so.
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 09:14 AM
Nov 2013

Gald you joined the celebration. Personally, I'm recovering this morning, but it was worth it.



-Laelth

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
20. I don't think he went far enough.
Fri Nov 22, 2013, 01:46 PM
Nov 2013

But I'll take what we got and thank our Majority Leader for it.

Thank you, Senator Reid!



-Laelth

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Celebration time!