General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre there crimes for which there is no possible rehabilitation?
In your opinion.
4 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Definitely | |
3 (75%) |
|
Maybe | |
0 (0%) |
|
Maybe not | |
0 (0%) |
|
Definitely not | |
1 (25%) |
|
The crime of this poll can't be forgiven! | |
0 (0%) |
|
I like to vote! | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Scuba
(53,475 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,844 posts)Does rehabilitated mean that they can keep themselves from committing similar crimes or does it mean that they don't want to commit similar crimes anymore? Because if it means the latter, you could probably say that child molesters can't be rehabilitated. Even if they can make themselves not do it anymore, it seems that they still have the urge to do it. They have to be closely monitored, and even with that they still get their hands on child porn or have other things that stimulate them sexually. I don't know if it's cheaper to keep them locked up or to allow them to live in halfway houses, but something must be done to ensure they won't do it again. They tend to be incorrigible.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...I do not accept that any particular crime, in and of itself, reliably indicates the impossibility of rehabilitation.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)It's usually not a single criminal act but taken as a whole. There have been some crimes committed for which the perpetrator could only have been suffering from mental defect for which we have no cure.
RC
(25,592 posts)Some of what used to be crimes, are not crimes now because too many people were doing it. (Example - living together) What used to be legal, became illegal because money could be made from busting them and locking them up. (Example - growing weeds) Harm quite often has nothing to do with legality.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Are some things legally classified as crimes that shouldn't be crimes - we might all answer yes (i certainly would on the pot thing). On the other hand I am more getting at things which are definitely crime and should be crimes - thinks like Murder, Child Abuse and the like.
Bryant
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)If there's only a 10% chance that Chism is ever going to kill again, that's way too high. If it's a 1% chance, that's way too high.
It's not worth the risk.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)To me, it isn't the crime, it is the person.
Every single crime is done by a host of different motivations.
A person might kill someone and immediately regret it afterwards, where they would strive for redemption.
That is the same for any crime.
Some people can't be rehabilitated, since rehabilitation is something that they genuinely have to want and work toward.
So, to me, it really depends on the person not the crime they have committed.