General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans: The number one reason the rest of the world thinks we're deaf, dumb, and dangerous...
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)loudsue
(14,087 posts)He's a really smart and talented liberal.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Did he write in an article? Did he say it in a monologue? Is it from an interview? Did Garrison Keillor ever actually say this at all? How would we know? THERE'S NO DAMN CITATION!
I really REALLY dislike these damn internet "meme" things! If someone has said something worth quoting, then it's worth the trouble to include a citation to where the quote originally appeared.
What if it were a photo of Garrison Keillor with a supposed quote saying, "I've come to realize that Republicans actually know what they're talking about, and we should listen to them." Wouldn't people be demanding a citation then? Why should we accept ANY citation-free quote?
Slapping a bunch of text next to a photo means absolutely NOTHING! I'm sick of seeing these stupid things posted on DU and I'm sick of watching people take these stupid things at face value.
/rant
No offense meant to you, personally, Playinghardball. I just think that perpetuating this sort of thing is really a disservice to all of us. Just because we agree with a sentiment is no reason to relax our standards of proof.
FatBuddy
(376 posts)chill.
"standards of proof" don't really apply to aphorisms and the like.
if you wanted to really show off and let people know how smart you are by demanding peer-reviewed internet memes, i guess you are doing a good job.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)I have actually seen so-called quotes on photos like this that were not actual quotes by that person at all. Granted, the ones that I have seen were in emails from RWNJ's, and they were meant to show that even liberals were coming around to their way of thinking. But it is a disservice to blindly take the word of the meme creator.
FatBuddy
(376 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)if your photo was superimposed with a RWNJ's rant. Especially if you are famous, but even if you aren't.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Exactly!
christx30
(6,241 posts)is that you can never know if they are genuine." - Abraham Lincoln
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)Source please!
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Anyone can take a photo and add some words next to the photo. Does that make it true? Does it prove that the person in the photo actually said those words?
DU has always been about demanding links and proof for any and all assertions. Why should we relax our standards when it comes to this kind of Facebook crap?
If Keillor tweeted those words, then include the link to his twitter feed. If he said them on Prairie Home Companion then include the date of the show so that anyone who wants to can go look up that particular broadcast.
This isn't about me being smart or not, this is about fighting against the whole "If it's on the internet, it must be true" gullibility and lack of critical thinking running rampant in our culture.
That's how Fox News gets away with so much bullshit - people don't question, they just suck it all up. Why would we want to encourage that kind of lazy passivity among ourselves?
FatBuddy
(376 posts)it is more internet static.
it has nothing to do with scholarship, the life of the mind, etc.
you are requiring standards of proof that inherently inconsistent with the project undertaken.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)To acculurate the masses into accepting any words posted next to a photo as the truth?
Since you've only been here since November 13th, perhaps you are unaware of the long tradition on DU of members requiring citations and sources before accepting anyone's assertions of "fact".
It's always been one of the facets of DU of which we have all been justly proud, as this tradition of demanding sources is one of the distinguishing characteristics that differentiates us from the Right.
FatBuddy
(376 posts)academic standards of proof, citing sources, or requiring peer review simply doesn't apply to internet memes.
an aphorism, a "quote," or an opinion are not facts.
it's easy enough to find out if a quote is not attributed properly: www.google.com.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Of no intellectual or discoursive value.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)Unless you like your "memes" with a dollop of 'Bernays' sauce.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]The RW loves to throw around unattributed/unattributable and frequently fabricated quotes, assertions, and statistics. Rewriting history is one of their hallmarks.
I refuse to even appear to do the same, so citing sources is critical.
FatBuddy
(376 posts)of "picking one's battles" since it helps to save time.
if i expected an academic level of proof for every piece of nonsense that gets farted on the internet, i'd really have to take a good, long, hard look at myself.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)http://prairiehome.publicradio.org/features/deskofgk/2006/old_scout/05/23.shtml
It doesn't explain where and when it happened, but it does verify THAT it happened.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)source cited.
It makes us no better than the mouth-breathing forwarders of RW emails.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)The party of Lincoln and Liberty was transmogrified into the party of hairy-backed swamp developers and corporate shills, faith-based economists, fundamentalist bullies with Bibles, Christians of convenience, freelance racists, misanthropic frat boys, shrieking midgets of AM radio, tax cheats, nihilists in golf pants, brownshirts in pinstripes, sweatshop tycoons, hacks, fakirs, aggressive dorks, Lamborghini libertarians, people who believe Neil Armstrong's moonwalk was filmed in Roswell, New Mexico, little honkers out to diminish the rest of us, Newt's evil spawn and their Etch-A-Sketch president, a dull and rigid man suspicious of the free flow of information and of secular institutions, whose philosophy is a jumble of badly sutured body parts trying to walk.
GARRISON KEILLOR, "We're Not in Lake Wobegon Anymore," In These Times
You hate meme's I hate stupidity. But most of all I hate attacking messengers for what? Having a shitty day?
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I will continue to obect to them, for the reasons previously stated.
Danascot
(4,690 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)By Garrison Keillor
Which took me all of 10 seconds to find out.
Lazy much?
rock
(13,218 posts)That's why they answer to the call, "Sooey, sooey, sooey!"
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]This is a genuine Keillor quote, taken from an article in 2004:
Were Not in Lake Wobegon Anymore.
See paragraph #3.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)After spending the last couple days shifting through the verbal sludge of republican talking points to counter the arguments of family members (I'd like to save them but, it's like trying to cure zombies). To read something in actual eloquent English.....................
silverweb
(16,402 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)It's that I'm not willing to stoop to the level of credulousness that we see on the Right, where nothing is ever questioned, where sources are never demanded, where actual proof and facts are considered irrelevant.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Playinghardball
(11,665 posts)Peacetrain
(22,874 posts)Having two brothers who are deaf..nothing goes my spine more than the term dumb when referring to people who are deaf.. they do speak.. if not the spoken word, than signing.. they are not mute.. they have a beautiful physical language that has accents.. you can tell where a person is from by their slang in their signs.. there is nothing dumb or mute about it.. (I know some people use dumb as a reference to mute.. but that is just as erroneous..) just saying ..
deafskeptic
(463 posts)I can speak quite well even if I don't quite sound normal at times. I was born with a severe to profound loss. There's nothing wrong with my brains either. It ticks me off when some people treat my friends who have a difficult time speaking get treated like they're less intelligent than those who can speak.
As for accents, I remember moving to Charlotte, NC. I remember thinking why on earth do Deaf locals talk about driving the GRASS of all the things? Turns out the ASL sign for grass/hay is the local sign for truck.
I think Garrison could benefit from a little lesson. I'm afraid I can't say that for many people though.
deafskeptic
(463 posts)Garrison should have said that Repubs are the reason why the world were think we're deaf, stupid and dangerous.
The words deaf and dumb used together in a sentence is offensive to the deaf. I don't think it was his intention to offend though.
Peacetrain
(22,874 posts)on point
(2,506 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)At least in a simplistic way, this surely is the case.
madokie
(51,076 posts)with all my heart.