Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums10 Acts of Madness By Right Wingers This Week -- Limbaugh's Rape Fantasies Edition
http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/10-acts-madness-right-wingers-week-limbaughs-rape-fantasies-edition1. Rush Limbaugh managed to compare the change in the filibuster rule to rape
We have a sneaking suspicion that Rush Limbaugh is looking for an excuse to talk about rape. Just a hunch. Sure enough, a rape analogy popped into this profoundly misogynistic mans mind to explain his objection to the change in the filibuster rule. Here he is, playing the role of what he, and his gullible listeners think, is an eminently reasonable man:
Lets forget the Senate for a minute. Lets say, lets take 10 people in a room and theyre a group. And the room is made up of six men and four women. OK? The group has a rule that the men cannot rape the women. The group also has a rule that says any rule that will be changed must require six votes, of the 10, to change the rule. Every now and then, some lunatic in the group proposes to change the rule to allow women to be raped. But they never were able to get six votes for it. There were always the four women voting against it and they always found two guys. Well, the guy that kept proposing that women be raped finally got tired of it, and he was in the majority and he was one that [said], You know what? Were going to change the rule. Now all we need is five.' And well, you cant do that. Yes we are. Were the majority. Were changing the rule. And then they vote. Can the women be raped? Well, all it would take then is half of the room. You can change the rule to say three. You can change the rule to say three people want it, its going to happen. Theres no rule. When the majority can change the rules there arent anything.
***SNIP
3. Climate denying group compares U.N. talks about climate change to the Holocaustimmediately after saying theres no comparison
We know what youre thinking. Oh no they di-int. Well, oh yeah, they did. But first, the head of the rabidly anti-science Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), wrote in a fundraising email unearthed by DeSmogBlog that nothing can be compared to what happened during the Holocaust at Aushwitz and Birkenau, which he had just visited. Certainly not the climate negotiations currently taking place in Poland.
There simply is no parallel, he wrote.
OK then, thats that. Cant be compared. Not going to do it.
Surely, the political and policy battles we are fighting cannot even begin to compare to the horrors represented by those camps, he affirmed.
Yes, yes. Why would anyone even go there?
And yet, having said he mustnt, go there he does:
Yet such examples from history are instructive to show just how far otherwise-civilized people can descend when they are gripped by false ideologies and twisted utopian ambitions.
***WHAT A WEEK.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 691 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
10 Acts of Madness By Right Wingers This Week -- Limbaugh's Rape Fantasies Edition (Original Post)
xchrom
Nov 2013
OP
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)1. He must REALLY hate the way the House is run, then.
onethatcares
(16,166 posts)2. when did
5 become the majority of ten? Apparently he's beginning to suffer from Al Capone syndrome in my opinion.