Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 12:35 PM Nov 2013

Isn't using private contractors for intel gathering an inherent security threat?

Even more than privatizing other aspects of government, which at worst, will lead to corruption and shitty service, with intel contractors, if they are doing such a poor job or commit such a major screw up that their bought politicians can't cover for them, they could easily have an ace up their sleeve: dirt on the people trying to disconnect them from the government teat.

Certainly any company doing work for the NSA would have that capability.

And those most upset about the Snowden or Stratfor leaks should be reconsidering contracting with Booz Allen or Stratfor--but a little file on their calls to their mistress, rentboys, offshore accounts, or even the frequency of their calls with some of their less savory donors might stop them from taking the obvious action.

Haven't our politicians profoundly compromised our national security in terms of internal threats by outsourcing this function to companies whose sole loyalty is to their own profits?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Isn't using private contr...