Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 11:59 AM Nov 2013

More Privacy Failures - Dropcams are a Black Friday Hit

Got $150. You can live stream anything at no charge. This year, the Dropcam is one of the hottest technology toys out there. You buy it, plug it in, connect it to your wireless network, and give the camera a name. You're streaming video. If you make your dropcam's feed public, anyone can look in.

Wanna see some samples:

https://www.dropcam.com/cameras/featured

Now, I have no problem with streaming live cams, but this new system is going to make it really easy for people, like some have in these samples, to put up a live streaming cam of anything, without disclosing the fact that if you come into view on the cam, anyone can see what you're up to.

Examples at the link above include a convenience store, a restaurant, and a couple of other public places. Do the people coming into those places know that they're on a live streaming camera? I doubt it very much. Anyhow, when you make your camera live, it's IP address becomes easy to access. If it's not private, you're on candid camera.

I'm not sure this is such a good thing, really. If you buy one of these things, consider whether you really want what it's seeing to be publicly viewable. Lots of people won't bother, and you'll soon see links to lots of these cameras.

Here's the convenience store camera: "Are You Open?"

https://www.dropcam.com/demo/a9e3c6a8a4694cb6a49a03981a9cb06c

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More Privacy Failures - Dropcams are a Black Friday Hit (Original Post) MineralMan Nov 2013 OP
my teen uses my laptop elehhhhna Nov 2013 #1
Good plan, I think. MineralMan Nov 2013 #2
gracias elehhhhna Nov 2013 #3
It's a sad state of being xulamaude Nov 2013 #5
Mine is a tiny butterfly sticker. Viva_La_Revolution Nov 2013 #10
So now we can all be spies. bemildred Nov 2013 #4
Pretty much, yes. MineralMan Nov 2013 #6
I think we are going to have to be much more clear about the differences bemildred Nov 2013 #7
These things will be used for porn in 3-2-1... Archae Nov 2013 #8
Yup. If it exists, there will be porn of it. MineralMan Nov 2013 #12
All they need is just one video of some women in a locker room... Archae Nov 2013 #13
I'm not sure there's all that much money in such stuff any more. MineralMan Nov 2013 #14
If you are in any convenience store, the odds are pretty good that you are being filmed, rudolph the red Nov 2013 #9
Of course, but folks on the Internet aren't watching you. MineralMan Nov 2013 #11
I guess I still don't get it rudolph the red Nov 2013 #15
No, you DON'T get it. Being seen out and about is WAAAAAY DIFFERENT from being FILMED out and about, WinkyDink Nov 2013 #18
Why are you using caps and calling me names? rudolph the red Nov 2013 #20
Big Brother's family has been greatly expanded. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16
Sounds like one of the technological wonders in Dave Eggers' book, The Circle matt819 Nov 2013 #17
Yup. What could go wrong? nt MineralMan Nov 2013 #19
I have multiple cams pointed at my (currently empty) marine aquarium and office X_Digger Nov 2013 #21
 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
1. my teen uses my laptop
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:03 PM
Nov 2013

her bf is a computer savant

I took an emery board to the camera lens on said laptop, jus in case

Yay, Mommy!

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
2. Good plan, I think.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:10 PM
Nov 2013

Teens are not the brightest bulbs in the chandelier sometimes, especially when it comes to boyfriends and girlfriends. Stuff happens.

 

xulamaude

(847 posts)
5. It's a sad state of being
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:33 PM
Nov 2013

that we feel compelled to 'disable' a tool which could be very useful in order to protect a daughter from her boyfriend AND the whole rest of the world.

Mine has a Band-Aid over it so I can remove it if I need to Skype with my partner or friends

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
6. Pretty much, yes.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:39 PM
Nov 2013

There will be misuses of this capability, I'm sure. Since the camera streams to the cloud, and since they can be made public, there is a lot of potential for misuse. There will be some who put up one of these cams pointed at something like a neighbor's house and then make the link public. There will be morons who put one in their dorm room and put a link to the feed on twitter or facebook, not thinking about who might be watching.

And, since this system has great potential for use as security cameras, they will get installed in lots and lots of businesses, some of which, like that convenience store will make the stream public without informing their customers that they're on live TV. I'm sure other uses will soon be thought of and exploited.

Since there's no recurring charge to set up one of these cameras unless you want to store video in the cloud to review later, it's a really low bar set for people who want to use these cameras maliciously. And there will be people who want to use them that way, for sure.

The images are of excellent quality, too. Point one at an ATM, for example, and watch customer poke in their numbers. I'm not sure I like the whole idea, but it's not going to go away.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
7. I think we are going to have to be much more clear about the differences
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:43 PM
Nov 2013

between public and private space. That lack of clarity is being exploited both by the "intelligence" community, and for commercial purposes.

I can see uses for these that are quite legitimate, and others that ought to be crimes.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
12. Yup. If it exists, there will be porn of it.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:56 PM
Nov 2013

With free wi-fi available just about everywhere, now, the locker room cam is inevitable, I think. People watch for those, though, so it probably wouldn't last long, I'd think. At $150 a crack, I'm not sure too many people are going to risk losing their cam that way. But, some, no doubt, will.

Archae

(46,301 posts)
13. All they need is just one video of some women in a locker room...
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:58 PM
Nov 2013

They sell it to "Girls Gone Wild" or such, make lots of $$$.

$150 is a small investment.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
14. I'm not sure there's all that much money in such stuff any more.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:00 PM
Nov 2013

People are posting their own stuff online, I understand, and I think it's a lot harder to sell porn video than it used to be. I'm not very current on the porn industry, though, so I'm not sure.

 

rudolph the red

(666 posts)
9. If you are in any convenience store, the odds are pretty good that you are being filmed,
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:51 PM
Nov 2013

and since you are out in public, there are probably thousands of strangers who see you going about your business on a daily basis. I don't really see the issue with streaming video in that instance, although I guess it would be considerate of the business owner to post up a sign.

It would be different if they had a camera in the restroom or changing room, where you legitimately expect and deserve privacy, but I just don't see the controversy otherwise.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
11. Of course, but folks on the Internet aren't watching you.
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 12:54 PM
Nov 2013

That's the difference. And it's an important one. A security camera is one thing, and they have caught many crimes in process, but a live video feed that is public is quite another.

 

rudolph the red

(666 posts)
15. I guess I still don't get it
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:09 PM
Nov 2013

public is public. If I'm out and about, I have no control over who or how many people see me walk into a store or go to a restaurant and eat. I understand the potential for abuse in situations when a person would expect total privacy, but otherwise it's not something that I would consider a problem.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
18. No, you DON'T get it. Being seen out and about is WAAAAAY DIFFERENT from being FILMED out and about,
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:21 PM
Nov 2013

you NINNY.

Normally, fellow diners do not STARE AT YOU. Normally, fellow pedestrians DO NOT STARE AT YOU AND FOLLOW YOUR EVERY MOVE.

NORMALLY, WE LIVE WITHOUT WORRYING THAT OUR MUNDANE TASKS WILL BE PUT ON YOUTUBE.

 

rudolph the red

(666 posts)
20. Why are you using caps and calling me names?
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:27 PM
Nov 2013

Did you look at the video link to the convenience store? Did you find yourself staring at the guy that was getting a quart of milk?

Take a deep breath before you hyperventilate.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
17. Sounds like one of the technological wonders in Dave Eggers' book, The Circle
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 01:21 PM
Nov 2013

The camera was called either C-Change, Sea-Change, or See-Change (I listened to the audio, so not sure how it's spelled out). They cost almost nothing and were tiny and could be place anywhere unobtrusively. One of the selling points was that you could place this at your favorite surf spot to check the waves. Sure, totally benign. Yea, right.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
21. I have multiple cams pointed at my (currently empty) marine aquarium and office
Fri Nov 29, 2013, 02:06 PM
Nov 2013

I very carefully limit the travel of the cameras (they can be remotely moved via pan/tilt buttons on a web page.)

I actually looked at the dropcam when I went shopping for a new camera, but it doesn't have remote pan / tilt.

My wife and I walk around them with the expectation that someone's watching the cameras.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More Privacy Failures - D...