Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 10:21 AM Dec 2013

UK Guardian: Looking for fraud? Don't look at food stamp recipients, look at Wall Street

A few weeks ago South Bronx public schools had a half-day, with dismissal at noon. Yet almost all the kids stayed an extra hour, waiting in the cafeteria to eat the schools' free lunch. Teachers even got calls from parents of children who hadn't stayed, asking them why they let their children leave without a meal. The teachers explained that this had never been an issue before. Kids had always left when they could. The parents responded, "That was before the cut in food stamps. We get $45 less a month now".

Sadly, Republicans in Congress are not just content to let the prior increases lapse, they are pushing for even greater cuts. They try to justify the reductions by pointing to the growth in food stamps and painting it as program rife with abuse. Of all the rule breakers out there, it's sad that Republicans seem to be focused only on the poor. You can look at any program and find some degree of abuse. When it comes to benefit fraud, food stamp abuse attracts a small, desperate group looking for another way to stay alive, to feed their addiction. They don't take any pride in their desperation.

Yet food stamps also keep about 47 million people fed, legally and efficiently. A tiny amount of fraud, estimated to be only 1.5% of the system, is not a bad price to pay for that to keep people from starving.

The much bigger abuser of programs, and exploiter of loopholes in rules, and regulations is Wall Street.
They don't do it out of desperation. They do it out of greed. When will congressional Republicans call them out for it?

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/03/fraud-wall-street-food-stamps-congress-cuts

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UK Guardian: Looking for fraud? Don't look at food stamp recipients, look at Wall Street (Original Post) pampango Dec 2013 OP
Good for the Guardian...hits the nail on the head! countryjake Dec 2013 #1
R#7 & K. This is on the way to the local radio talk show wingnuts. One of them is a 27 yr old UTUSN Dec 2013 #2
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #3

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
1. Good for the Guardian...hits the nail on the head!
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 10:54 PM
Dec 2013

And I learned a new word from this piece:

louche
/lo͞oSH/
adjective
1. disreputable or sordid in a rakish or appealing way.

Kick and Recommend!

UTUSN

(70,641 posts)
2. R#7 & K. This is on the way to the local radio talk show wingnuts. One of them is a 27 yr old
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 11:22 PM
Dec 2013

Last edited Wed Dec 4, 2013, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)

who is a total jabbering idiot, all the canned 'Bagger talking points. He's a military brat who omits to mention he grew up with government perks. When he first blessed us with his presence, he would yammer on about the abuse of food stamps and how he would peep into the shopping carts and that he railed at somebody who was using stamps for a small item while taking a large amount of cash and that he tried taking pictures of people and was reprimanded by the cashier. p.o.s.


Meanwhile Bill MAHER or COLBERT even Jon STEWART who nailed O'LOOFAH with, "You're always saying you're looking out for the Little Guy but you never fail to come down on the side of the Big Guys."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UK Guardian: Looking for ...