General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNuclearDem
(16,184 posts)They aren't fighting the 1%'s wars anymore. Useless.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)BelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)they do provide for manly backdrops, no?
War is a force that gives us meaning, indeed.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)That would leave us with two active service carriers, one for the atlantic and one for the pacific, and it would be two more than anyone else.
And by aircraft carrier I mean a ship that weighs in at around 100,000 tons, not a helicopter launch vessel. We could have a couple of pint sized carriers too - like maybe four ~50,000 ton ships.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)We need the name freed up so we can put it on a Starship;^)
At the moment we seem to be capable of keeping 3 Carriers deployed.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Magnitude,
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)No other Navy in the world has more than two aircraft carriers. The United States has 11.
In fact, minus the American arsenal, the world's nations possess 14 total, and the majority of these are light carriers and light fleet carriers (not really considered blue water carriers), rather the the power projection carriers (heavy carriers and fleet carriers) the US uses and bases its doctrine off of.
Were it me as Secretary of the Navy, knowing what I know (as well as what I don't know), I'd be more than satisfied with six fleet carriers... and might even consider that an excessive number.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)FreeJoe
(1,039 posts)as long as the companies making them keep the campaign donations flowing.