Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:00 PM Dec 2013

REALITY! We have 3 Candidate that Many DU'ers Support for 2016:

Warren and Sanders for the Progressive Left and Hillary for the Democratic "Third Way" to the Right of Dem Progressives who represents the "Old Republican Party" Ideals mixed in with the TURN for Dems to the Business/Free Trade "NEW DEMOCRATS" that elected Bill Clinton.

SO...how do we UNITE the Dem Party for 2016?

Warren says she's not running. But, supporters think they can convince her to run. Sanders is a Socialist and he says he will not run Third Party.

Hillary is a known factor being a "Third Way" Old School Republican leaning Democrat for Globilization and Wall Street is our Friend Politics.

Who else is out there? Is there ANYONE ELSE in Democratic Party who could TRULY UNITE US? Or, is this a time in America where we fight it out...and hope for the best...while expecting or figuring the "Same" is what we will get?

Where are the OTHER FIGHTING DEMOCRATS who are Old enough to have some Horse Sense but Young Enough to follow the "Youth Vote" that swept Obama into Power?

And why is there not a huge SLATE of Candidates from our Dem Party that we have MANY TO CHOOSE FROM? Why only THREE top Contenders?



40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
REALITY! We have 3 Candidate that Many DU'ers Support for 2016: (Original Post) KoKo Dec 2013 OP
I don't think Hillary is running. She endorsed Warren NoOneMan Dec 2013 #1
Funny, I read that also, right blue14u Dec 2013 #4
Senator Whitehouse should toss his hat in the ring. shraby Dec 2013 #2
I like this OP. K&R blue14u Dec 2013 #3
Fantasy presidential league BainsBane Dec 2013 #5
Well, I, like many others think it's too early....but it seems we need to do this KoKo Dec 2013 #6
I'm not eager to lose federal and state seats in 2014. BainsBane Dec 2013 #8
Indeed, pacing oneself is always a good idea. Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #13
Anyone have any other Candidates or Ideas about Candidates? KoKo Dec 2013 #10
Sherrod Brown Proud Public Servant Dec 2013 #7
I've liked him too..but there's some family issue with divorced wife or something? KoKo Dec 2013 #9
I like Brown loyalsister Dec 2013 #19
... William769 Dec 2013 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #12
Well..that's only one name. And, his chance has passed. KoKo Dec 2013 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #15
And who, exactly, determines that "chance"? Scootaloo Dec 2013 #26
The wall street moguls with their Citizens United dollars will determine the candidate warrant46 Dec 2013 #27
They only have the power that we divest to them via our own apathy n/t Scootaloo Dec 2013 #29
True so true, but the apathy you state runs wide, deep and with ignonance overwhelming warrant46 Dec 2013 #30
Chelsea or Malia. Gotta be. Demo_Chris Dec 2013 #16
How about Cory Booker? ucrdem Dec 2013 #17
Martin O'Malley loyalsister Dec 2013 #18
+1. Gotta agree. n/t FSogol Dec 2013 #20
+1 Agschmid Dec 2013 #22
You lost me here... Agschmid Dec 2013 #21
Why not Al Franken? Brigid Dec 2013 #23
Given the astronomical cost of running, I think others are waiting for the right time. AuntFester Dec 2013 #24
They only ever have two candidates; Batshit or Dumbfuck Scootaloo Dec 2013 #28
You're forgetting the 3 hybrid versions-- Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #32
Nah, I just didn't want to talk about Bachmann Scootaloo Dec 2013 #35
Yah. Well, I guess you read my mind on that one. Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #36
Nah, she has ovaries, so she's not in the running with those goons Scootaloo Dec 2013 #37
No wonder global warming doesn't bother them-- Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #39
Nah, that's just them being Dumbshit Batfuckers, or whatever n/t Scootaloo Dec 2013 #40
Huckabee and Christie Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #34
Boxer(CA)\Slaughter(NY) Mc Mike Dec 2013 #25
FWI I believe Hillary leans to the left of her husband Tom Rinaldo Dec 2013 #31
Doesn't matter Capt. Obvious Dec 2013 #33
... SidDithers Dec 2013 #38
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
1. I don't think Hillary is running. She endorsed Warren
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:06 PM
Dec 2013

Per Snowden in a leak concerning government spying on heads of state, there was a spied on secret email in which Hillary encouraged Warren to run for president. I'd love to show it to you, but its secret. Nonetheless, its endorsalicious and means Hillary won't run.

blue14u

(575 posts)
4. Funny, I read that also, right
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:20 PM
Dec 2013

here on DU...

Any sentence with the words "Hillary", and "won't run"

gets my complete and absolute attention, and support...

blue14u

(575 posts)
3. I like this OP. K&R
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:11 PM
Dec 2013

I believe we could look at Whitehouse and Grayson also. There are more I'm sure, these are the ones who come to mind for now.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
6. Well, I, like many others think it's too early....but it seems we need to do this
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:41 PM
Dec 2013

So Yeah! Go For It...Fantasy Presidential League!

Who are your Nominees?

AND...What Issues do you want your Team to Represent you on?

I'm Game..

BainsBane

(53,016 posts)
8. I'm not eager to lose federal and state seats in 2014.
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 10:53 PM
Dec 2013

So I won't be playing fantasy presidential politics.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. Indeed, pacing oneself is always a good idea.
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 08:39 PM
Dec 2013

People who lament the state of DU now, have no idea what a mess it is going to be in 2015.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
9. I've liked him too..but there's some family issue with divorced wife or something?
Thu Dec 5, 2013, 11:28 PM
Dec 2013

He would be on my list..but, haven't checked him out in awhile.

But..Add Sherrod Brown to the list of possibilities.

Response to KoKo (Original post)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. Well..that's only one name. And, his chance has passed.
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 09:22 PM
Dec 2013

Surely there are others...but, I can't think of anyone either...except the ones named in the OP.

Well..on second thought, how about Alan Grayson and some talk about Deval Patrick?

Response to KoKo (Reply #14)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
26. And who, exactly, determines that "chance"?
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:05 AM
Dec 2013

At this point, I think I could get behind just about any liberal that put their hat in.

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
27. The wall street moguls with their Citizens United dollars will determine the candidate
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:10 AM
Dec 2013

And from the look of it they have already anointed their choice

warrant46

(2,205 posts)
30. True so true, but the apathy you state runs wide, deep and with ignonance overwhelming
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:20 AM
Dec 2013

But you have a good point !!

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
17. How about Cory Booker?
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 10:02 PM
Dec 2013

I bet he could get elected if everyone got behind him. I'm not so sure about some of the others. Whether Booker is up to the job is another question, but he seems to have a knack for getting elected, and that's the first order of business.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
18. Martin O'Malley
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 10:08 PM
Dec 2013

I like that he worked his way up starting with Baltimore City Council. His record indicates that he is pretty liberal.

A MD Dream Act, same sex marriage, anti-death penalty.

I am definitely interested in hearing more from him.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_O%27Malley


One interesting thing about Hillary speculation is that if she decided not to run after learning of someone else's candidacy, it strengthens them right away.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
21. You lost me here...
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 10:17 PM
Dec 2013
Warren says she's not running. But, supporters think they can convince her to run.
 

AuntFester

(57 posts)
24. Given the astronomical cost of running, I think others are waiting for the right time.
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 10:21 PM
Dec 2013

Now is not the right time because it is too early.

On the flip side, who do you think the Republicans will be running? Who will announce for their primaries?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
28. They only ever have two candidates; Batshit or Dumbfuck
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:13 AM
Dec 2013

Since they've run Dumbfuck twice now and lost twice, I imagine they'll take a gamble on Batshit.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
32. You're forgetting the 3 hybrid versions--
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:25 AM
Dec 2013

Batfuck, Dumbshit & Dumbbat. I go with the third alternative, myself.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
35. Nah, I just didn't want to talk about Bachmann
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:41 AM
Dec 2013

If you say her name three times, she appears and eats all your corndogs. With, you know... that look in her horrible, dead glassy fish-eyes.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
36. Yah. Well, I guess you read my mind on that one.
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:34 AM
Dec 2013

She's got it all--stupid, wacko & corrupt.

Migod, now that I think about it, she oughtta be the perfect Republican candidate.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
37. Nah, she has ovaries, so she's not in the running with those goons
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:37 AM
Dec 2013

Granted in her case, I think that they produce frogspawn... and Y'ha-nthlei is a Republican stronghold, so I've heard.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
39. No wonder global warming doesn't bother them--
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 11:42 AM
Dec 2013

they can breathe underwater.

In the realms of Lovecraft, practicing hatecraft.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,911 posts)
31. FWI I believe Hillary leans to the left of her husband
Sat Dec 7, 2013, 10:22 AM
Dec 2013

With clear Democratic majorities in Congress we could still move this nation forward if she were the sitting President. I would love a Warren or Sanders as president, though both outcomes seem highly unlikely, but I sure don't fault any of us for working toward that if we have the inclination and time to do so. And it's possible for one reason or another that Hillary won't even run, so we should be prepared for that possibility. But I won't take part in trashing Hilary Clinton as merely a warmed over stale Republican. She is light years better than anyone the Republicans may nominate. In theory at least, we can do a lot better than Hilary. In practice, maybe yes, maybe no. But the emphasis now must be on holding the Senate and taking the House.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»REALITY! We have 3 Candi...