General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Nelson Mandela really believed
As the world honors Nelson Mandela, there's a strong pull toward white-washing his legacy, leaving out the revolutionary part of his legacy. ThinkProgress has a more appropriate tribute today: Six Things Nelson Mandela Believed That Most People Won't Talk About
........//snip
Read the rest here: http://thinkprogress.org/home/2013/12/06/3030781/nelson-mandela-believed-people-wont-talk/
polly7
(20,582 posts)7 Nelson Mandela Quotes You Probably Wont See In The U.S. Media
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/7-nelson-mandela-quotes-you-probably-wont-see-in-the-us-medi
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)What a world where the good are punished and war criminals walk free.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)were not always coterminous. I think this is something that people don't understand about political leaders in general. And it's not that they are abandoning their beliefs in their ascent to leadership. These are simply different realms: theory and practice. It's possible to believe something, but not act on it for strategic or practical reasons, or fail to achieve the ends of those beliefs. Or sometimes the beliefs are simply too big to be able to realize in practice.
Mandela, in addition to being a revolutionary thinker and bold actor, was also a practical man, and he saw his job after release to be the reconciliation of factions in his country. He knew nothing else would be possible without that. It meant acting against his "beliefs" in a fairly literal way by including the white minority oppressors in the new democracy ... (we know this story).
He did not solve the problem of poverty for Black South Africans, or fully right inequality. (He couldn't even come close.) This doesn't mean he did not still see the fight to eradicate poverty as an essential one, or freedom from poverty a "fundamental human right."
I say this because all too often I see people criticizing senators or the president as wrong in their beliefs when in reality it is a question of their failure to accomplish something. (By extension, we often tend to laud certain people for their "beliefs"--i.e., what they say, with little evidence of their ability to implement these beliefs.) If, for example, we were to read Obama's economic speech from earlier this week 40 years from now, it would probably be seen as "revolutionary" (and a continuation of his beliefs of many years). Yet, like Mandela, he in no way has been able to implement those beliefs in reality. Some of it is because he lacks the political majorities; some if perhaps that he hasn't tried hard enough. But this is no different than Mandela.
Beliefs are important for what they inspire, not for what they do. And we shouldn't confuse the two things.
OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)Nor should we expect them to do so.