General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichael Jackson and Michael Vick. It's amazing how some people can't let shit go.
Michael Jackson, for all his faults, was a very talented and caring man.
Yet to some here, he was/is nothing but a filthy pedophile. That's their story and they're sticking to it.
Michael Vick was tried for his crimes, found guilty and served time.
Yet he is still punished by some who go out of their way to deny the man any kind of forgiveness.
What he did was horrible and disgusting. I am an animal lover so it was very hard for me. Yet I can't go along with the sentiments of those who think he should be punished for the rest of his life.
Sometimes you have to just let shit go.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)One of them still has people convinced that because he was talented and caring that the occasional child rape was A-OK.
I don't care much about Vick but fuck MJ and his whole miserable life. Without Quincy Jones he would have been a footnote in history.
Aphrodite Jones uses the court transcripts and photo evidence never before seen by the public to tell the real story behind the salacious headlines -- and what went on inside -- and outside -- Michael Jackson's highly sensationalized 2005 criminal trial. Turns out, inside the courtroom, there was no proof offered of Michael Jackson as a sinister character, and no proof that he committed a single crime. In their efforts to win ratings, Jones proves,the media completely missed the truth. Back then, Jackson was the pop icon everyone loved to hate. Now, with Michael Jackson Conspiracy, he may be restored to the pop icon everyone loves to love.
http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Jackson-Conspiracy-Aphrodite-Jones/dp/0578061112
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)CatWoman
(79,293 posts)but it is puzzling?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)To the boy who described his penis. MJ was a sick bastard. Children, including his own are safer today.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)Do the victims of rape, especially by a wealthy pop star, ever get to "let it go"?
Dozens of young men will live the rest of their lives with what MJ did to them and then paid their parents to cover up.
Actually, the documents show more than that. They show that some of the parents were willing accomplices in the sexual exploitation of their own children. Jackson was apparently once caught by a member of his staff groping a child star; another time he was caught watching child pornography while touching another child; a third time, he was caught grasping at the genitals of a different child in his movie theater. The mother of one of these kids was in the theater at the time, supposedly unaware of all of this. Overall, at least 17 boys were abused, according to the files.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/how-michael-jackson-got-away-with-it/
Having the parents participate in the rapes takes it to whole other level (if that is even possible).
Society has a responsibility to protect children from monsters like Jackson and Sandusky. We should never forget how these two operated with the acquiescence of those around them.
Just follow the money and BELIEVE THE CHILDREN. (and please stop telling MJ's rape victims to get over it)
zappaman
(20,606 posts)The amount of porn and pictures of naked children found in his home was staggering.
It's sad and sick to read people here defending him just because they liked some songs.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)That said if someone said "I just can't listen to Jackson's music without thinking of that other stuff; it irritates me - so I just don't buy or listen to Michael Jackson anymore," would that be an example of not letting shit go?
Or to give an embarrassing example - I quite like Duran Duran - but their album "Seven and the Raged Tiger" I can't enjoy because it was played a lot in 8th grade at Junior high when i was either lonely or getting picked on. So that album (and some other music) I just don't care to listen to.
Bryant
marsis
(301 posts)CatWoman
(79,293 posts)?
marsis
(301 posts)You posted that people won't let it go and they posted and proved you right.
ah, got it.
sometimes my brain flickers on and off like a light bulb
and to your point, they are somewhat, um, vocal about it.
marsis
(301 posts)gotten all these poor people into an uproar, too funny.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)would that be okay?
If Jimmy Carter was fighting dogs in his back yard, would that be okay?
There are things that normal, moral people do not do. Fucking kids and torturing dogs are two of those things. If you do them, you're gross and I want nothing to do with you.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)I grew up in the same area as Michael Vick (Tidewater, VA), and I saw some mean shit done to animals. Done by my own father, no less. But I don't then nor now think it's "ok".
And I'll need more than your word that MJ was "fucking kids".
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)sharing a bed with pubescent children that he wasn't related to?
If he said it was totally innocent, you would believe him?
You're really naive, dude.
Blus4u
(608 posts)she's a dude, man!
Otherwise her handle probably would be "Catman"...just guessin' here, but today you never know.
Peace
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Abuse children? Abuse animals? Live (or die) with the fact that some people will never forgive and forget. And no one who does it - or their fans - that everyone will.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)the WH...
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)That man got a raw deal from every yellow fucking journalist out there - and there are too many. It's sickening that any adult that claims to 'love children' is suspected of something evil.
I'm still not at a place to 'forgive' Vick (as if I have that kind of authority over any one) but I will at least let it go.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)in some sense with those kids. I just don't know if he actually did what he was accused of, which was fondling them AKA sexual abuse.
He was a naive, and likely somewhat disturbed, man. But was he a child molester? I honestly don't know...
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Little-boy fucker Michael Jackson paid tens of millions of dollars to keep his ass out of jail.
Big difference.
Also, Vick is scum for what he did but that pales in comparison with the crimes of little-boy fucker Michael Jackson...
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)He liked to sleep with children, why does that fact so infuriate some here when it is told? Folks he was a grown man sleeping with children, I don't care how much you want him to be forgiven...that is just wrong.
I don't really think about either two men much, unless someone brings them up on a forum.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)That you would excuse a grown man for fucking little boys?
Pathetic.
Rex
(65,616 posts)and MJ and his sleeping with kids is that line. Also, I can separate his music from his personal issues.
What really gets me is that Michael Jackson had such severe psychological problems, yet why the fuck wasn't anyone living off his billions trying to get him help? If they really cared about HIM and wanted HIM to get better...nah didn't happen.
Nobody gave enough of a shit, just like they didn't care if he slept with kids or dangled a baby from a 7th story window. As long as the money train was coming in, hell they let him die...because it was his 'wish' to live longer (or whatever crazy shit by that time was going on in his head). Sure, for a buck and now their money cow is dead.
The entire thing is sad really, probably why I don't think about it much.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Sad on that level.
But being a little-boy fucker has no excuse.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)that was just stupid.
It was on the news 24/7, so I can't agree with your "nobody cared" sentiment.
I remember Steve Irwin being called out as well, when he fed this huge crocodile while holding his infant son.
So many faulty memories around here.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Maybe you should have read the post it was in response to.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Babies are so wiggly and squirmy.
The Irwin thing didn't bother me as much, for some reason. Or maybe it did. It was quite awhile ago.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Just like I believe some Catholic Priests have raped choir boys. I don't like the fact and I sure wish it wasn't true, but it is. I blame his handlers just as much as I blame him.
Then there was his 'doctor' jacking him up with horse tranquilizer until he dies.
All totally preventable things imo.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)I'm enthralled by finding the truth by not excusing stupid shit that people post as fact.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)You can still enjoy his music.
It's just tainted somewhat by the fact he fucked little boys...
Initech
(100,038 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)I do hate little-boy fuckers.
Unabashedly.
My cross to carry...
Initech
(100,038 posts)But where is the evidence that Jackson paid that kind of money to get out of jail?
Michael Jackson paid £23MILLION buying silence of at least TWO DOZEN young boys he abused over 15 years
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/michael-jackson-paid-23million-buying-2011662
FBI Docs On Michael Jackson: 'Only Boys That Never Slept In His Room Were His Nephews'
http://www.celebuzz.com/2013-07-02/michael-jackson-allegedly-paid-35-million-to-silence-boys-he-sexually-abused/
Michael Jackson Allegedly Paid Off Molestation Victim's Families
http://www.contactmusic.com/news/michael-jackson-molestation-allegations-documents_3741799
Michael Jackson trial: Star allegedly spent $35 million to silence 24 boys, could help Wade Robson's case: sources
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/michael-jackson-trial-spent-35-million-silence-24-boys-wade-robson-case-sources-article-1.1386694?localLinksEnabled=false
Those are all from this year.
Here's the first time it was shown he paid off a kid's family...
Michael Jackson's $15 Million Payoff
Agreed to pay $15 million to settle boy's 1993 sex abuse claim
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/celebrity/michael-jacksons-15-million-payoff
Michael Jackson Conspiracy (New Edition) is the only full account of the phenomenon that was "the Michael Jackson trial." Providing vivid details that people never saw in the news, Jones describes the accuser and his family as a band of grifters, a group of gold-diggers, who were looking for a payday in Hollywood . An intense account of what really happened in the Santa Maria courtroom, the author reveals the sham behind the allegations of accuser Gavin Arvizo, who had also "targeted" other celebrities like Chris Tucker, Jay Leno, and George Lopez, before landing the biggest fish of all: Michael Jackson. The book exposes, undeniably, why the jury found Michael Jackson NOT GUILTY on all counts, and how a media frenzy ignored the actual evidence, opting instead for ratings and sensationalism, at the expense Jackson's reputation.
http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Jackson-Conspiracy-New-Edition/dp/0615686206
The audience is transported back to 1993 and taken through the first set of allegations levelled against Jackson. Much time is dedicated to the controversial settlement of the civil suit brought by Jordan Chandler's parents. That settlement, Jones suggests, is the primary cause of many people's reservations about Jackson.
Former Jackson manager Frank Dileo says that Jackson was tricked into the settlement by business advisors more interested in the star's earning power than his public image. Thomas Mesereau, who represented Jackson in his 2005 trial, adds that the settlement also set a precedent for anybody wishing to extort money from Michael Jackson, sending the message that he was an easy target. It created an attitude, he says: 'Why work when you can just sue Michael
Jackson?'
It was Jackson's concern over the impact of the settlement on his public image, Jones claims, that inspired him to let Martin Bashir into his inner sanctum. Seduced by Bashir's promise that his documentary would centre on Jackson's quest to achieve an International Children's Holiday, the star gave Bashir unprecedented access to his life in the hope that it would vindicate him of the 1993 child abuse allegations. But Bashir manipulated the footage in order to advance his own career, Jones says. Bashir ended up crossing the pond to work as a news anchor for ABC, while the documentary Jackson hoped would vindicate him actually wound up serving as the catalyst to a second set of allegations.
Thomas Mesereau describes former DA Tom Sneddon - who tried to prosecute Jackson in 1993 and brought charges against him in 2003 - as being "obsessed to the point of absurdity". Paul Rodriguez, jury foreman in Jackson's trial, agrees. "He came across like he was just doing anything he could to pursuade us to look at things his way, regardless of the evidence," he says. "It was almost like he had a vendetta against him."
Criminal defence lawyer and celebrity trial expert Mickey Sherman adds:
"I think [the prosecution] got too emotionally invested in the case. I think Tom Sneddon seemed gleeful. Gleeful. He took a little too much pleasure in dishing out misery to Michael Jackson... There was such an eagerness to dish out some bad stuff to Michael Jackson that the credibility was, if not lost, certainly diminished."
Jones asserts that the media ignored the not guilty verdicts in Jackson's trial and continued to portray him as a predator because it made 'great headlines on the covers of rag papers'. Mesereau adds that the media was 'humiliated' by the verdicts because reporters had been predicting a conviction and 'almost salivating about him being hauled off to jail'. Jones concludes that the trial traumatised Jackson to such an extent that he was unable to sleep, and this is why he died of a propofol overdose last summer.
http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2010/04/preview-true-crime-with-aphrodite-jones.html
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)A 34-year veteran of the LAPD, hes investigated more than 4,000 sexual exploitation cases. He was also one of the lead detectives investigating the charges against Jackson. And for the first time, he is talking about the investigation from the inside, exclusively with Dateline.
Dworin: Everybody who listened to this child, cause hes not only interviewed by my officers, he was interviewed by Department of Children and Family Services, he was interviewed by the district attorneys office at a later date, we were all satisfied he was a very credible witness.
(snip)
Dworin: We had served a search warrant to photograph Michael Jackson. Those photographs corroborated the description that the boy gave us regarding Michael Jacksons genitals.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3080078#.UqeWuOJO6P8
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)are a more reliable source than some children.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Can she describe it in detail?
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)where are the little girls claiming he molested them, or the grown women claiming they were assaulted?
All the victims fit a profile.
Chock full of vitamins and amino acids.
Well, acid anyway
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Michael Jackson championed AIDS research. He not only made some good music, he also did a fair amount of good in the world. I'm not convinced that he ever molested any child. He is guilty of showing very bad judgment in regards to children.
Michael Vick gets a pass because he served his time. Other criminals are given second chances for their crimes...so why not him? He does a fair amount of charity work as well.
Some people feel the need to retain their moral high ground so fiercely that they will not give second chances to those who served the time that the state demanded. It's convenient for them.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm not in a position to forgive either one, as neither did anything to me. It's up to their victims to forgive.
However, although I often separate the art from the artists, sometimes the artists becomes known by his non-artistic works. Albert Speer was a very talented residential architect.
And although I am, have been and will be boycotting the NFL until Vick is out of the league, his punishment is indeed over, he's cashing huge paychecks, has an adoring fan club, and you seem to care more about people's opinions of him than he himself does...
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)by "yellow journalists" like Martin Bashir and Diane Dimond for ratings and money.
The two aren't similar at all.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)one was found not guilty, is dead now, and still being trashed.
We have to agree to disagree.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)There's something of a difference between "actually torturing dogs so that they'll tear each other up" and "being accused by a liar for a payout and then getting crucified by the media over it"
Jackson was a victim. Vick was an abuser. BIG difference.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)point in carrying on about him
Vick did his time in jail so I don't see the point in rehashing.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)one on each.
I got disgusted reading thru them, resisted the urge to post in them and decided to post my own thread.
That ok with you?
Your ignore/trash thread button not working?
Um...I was agreeing with you - no need to get mad at me.
I'm sorry
I read your post incorrectly
Given the venom and misinformation slung around here, that's not hard to do.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I probably wasn't super clear about it either.
And you are right, with the chair flinging and such it's easy enough to do.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)It doesn't entitle them to complete and total forgiveness. What Vick did was sick, and yes he served his time and shouldn't be legally persecuted for it, but it doesn't mean I'm under any obligation to like him.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Sometimes you do things for other reasons.
840high
(17,196 posts)Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)I started the Michael Vick thread. Fuck that fucking fuck. I was watching a game, one that featured his team and I thought "fuck that fucking fuck". I am so fucking glad that i am never going to see that fucking fuck's fucking face again on TV and thought I might express my thoughts on that very subject.
I don't give a fuck about the guy really, he will ALWAYS have a better life than you and me, and that includes his treatment in the penal system. More athletic privilege.
I am glad his career is over. Glad he got his ass handed to him before he left too. I hope that I don't see his fucking face on fucking TV in any capacity.....
Now tell me what is the deal in Ukraine? Who do we support there?
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)Michael Jackson --------> Jonas Salk.
Best post in that thread.
And yes, I understand you don't give a fuck. You must be proud.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)I let myself get caught up in BB's little hatefest yesterday, and it was a real sick party.
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)It was a one day outdoor concert they had every year. We called it the white trash bash because there were some real pieces of work. One guy wore a shirt that said "fuck you you fucking fuck". I KNOW this 50 year old loser had this shirt sitting out for a week, thinking he would be a stud for wearing it.
Texasgal
(17,038 posts)Amazing that DU'ers are not allowed to have an opinion about a pedophile creep and a dog torturer without being lectured.
It's not up to anyone here on DU to tell me what to "let go" of.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)or that I was lecturing "you".
But you do need to let go of some things. Just an opinion.
Texasgal
(17,038 posts)I'll let it go when I want to. Until then I still think they are both assholes.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)"Pressed permed hair with glitter sprinkled on it" "Would you let your children sleep with Michael Jackson" Fuck NO!
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)and deserve any and all criticisms.
trumad
(41,692 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,494 posts)The stuff he put out after "Bad" was pretty unforgivable.
1000words
(7,051 posts)More accurately, the lack of these traits.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)Michael Vick did NOT serve any time for animal torture or slaughter: he was convicted and served time for shady financial dealings related to his profit from the dog fights. This is not complex or difficult to understand but time and time again apologists for this creep ignore it completely. Vick was convicted of "Conspiracy to Travel in Interstate Commerce in Aid of Unlawful Activities and to Sponsor a Dog in an Animal Fighting Venture". This is a RICO charge, not an animal cruelty charge. The animal cruelty was considered only an "aggravating circumstance" for sentencing. MICHAEL VICK DID NOT SERVE ANY TIME FOR TORTURING OR SLAUGHTERING ANY OF THOSE DOGS.
As for defending that serial pedophile, I couldn't be more disgusted. He never paid for his crimes against children and is still idolized as a hero by millions because he could dance and write a catchy little jingle. Pardon my French, but f*ck that noise.
Blus4u
(608 posts)You just blew some really fresh air into what had become a pretty stinky room.
as a rookie myself, welcome and......
Peace
JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)let it go. We have other stuff to bitch about!
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Could never figure out whether he was a pedophile or just crazy. With normal people it's easier to understand their motivations, but with crazy people like MJ it's much more difficult to nail down.
At the trial he was found "not guilty" on all counts. His behavior was indicative of what I would think of as a pedophile, then again his behavior was also indicative of extreme eccentricity/mental problems. His behavior in other areas of his life made absolutely zero sense to me, so it's damn-near impossible for me to say beyond a reasonable doubt what he did.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)put a human being in a completely insane situation, i.e. lifelong global celebrity from Early Childhood.
Think of how most of us relate to the Universe; we all have solipsistic tendencies, to be sure.. yet the Universe is constantly offering us reminders that it does not, in fact, orbit around us.
With MJ, he never got that. He WAS constantly at the center of an attention, reality, and existence tempest, all whirling around, and because of, him.
That would fuck up even the most hardy, solid mind.
Edited to add: The British Royal family is probably the only comparable example, but they have had generations to come up with institutionalized coping mechanisms for it.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)As far as MJ, they were all alegations. So I won't comment there.
But may Vick suffer for the rest of eternity for what he has done!! Fuck him and fuck anyone who abuses innocent animals.
Have a nice evening.
CatWoman
(79,293 posts)as I stated, I watched my father do horrible things to dogs. Not just my dad, but other male family members.
I constantly donate to animal shelters (only the no kill ones). My neighbor and I catch, fix and release the feral cats back into the neighborhood. I pay for the procedures.
Having said that, am I supposed to hate on my father and piss on his grave for his transgressions, after all these years?
You have a nice evening as well.
Texasgal
(17,038 posts)these two people on a anonymous message board. I don't think you can really conflate the two.
mokawanis
(4,435 posts)and Vick is one of them. Paying the debt for his crimes doesn't make him a likable guy. In my opinion what he did was so awful he gets the "asshole" tag attached to his name for a long time to come.
Bodhi BloodWave
(2,346 posts)which quite honestly i agree with, he is somewhat of an asshole after all, what irks me to some degree though is those who makes posts and such suggesting he should never hold another job, that he never should be able to do the sport he loves, that every single positive thing he does is 'just another PR move' to trick people into liking him yadi yadi yadi.
the first(asshole view) is a simple dislike, but when people start to basically hope eternal misery and punishment on somebody i think they might take it juuuuuust a tad to far.
mokawanis
(4,435 posts)While I think Vick is an asshole I don't think the punishment should be ongoing. From what I know of the situation he paid for things he did and now he's getting on with his life. That sounds fair to me. I'll probably continue to think of him as an asshole for a long time, but I don't want to see him injured or have his career cut short.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)Yes.. I went there..
They both paid their dues...
Bush is still walking around free..and so are all the criminals on Wall Street..
JI7
(89,240 posts)ever did anything wrong.
the only thing people can say about him is he may have been weird.
the father of the first boy who accused him killed himself after jackson died . i wonder if he felt guilt.
bashir exploited jackson's weirdness to promote his interview.
but bashir even said afterwards that he never saw jackson do anything that was inappropriate.
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)On the Road
(20,783 posts)I am going to keep that expression around.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)IF he actually abused kids, sorry, not gonna "let that go". It's hard to whitewash something like that or "balance it against" the rest of the dude's life.
But I don't know.
All I can say about MJ is, I wasn't a big fan of his music. I do get a little annoyed when people think every damn teen in America spent 1983 listening to Thriller.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)he was like a child himself
but Vick? He is a sociopath.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Not very childlike
Skittles
(153,113 posts)not worth my time
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)13 year old boy wouldn't jump at the chance to have, or even look at, a porn stash?
MJ's chronological age and mental age were so disparate it wasn't even funny. I would say his mental age probably WAS about 13.
Which, IMO, is a child
A baby
So yeah...it's pretty child like...
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Here:
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/011805pltreqaseemd.pdf
He bribed the boy (over 20 million Dollars!). That's why he didn't serve time
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)I find it amazing how people dismiss the reality that MJ was the epitome of a child sexual groomer.
To establish a good relationship with the child and the childs family, child groomers might do several things. For example, they might take an undue interest in someone elses child, to be the childs special friend to gain the childs trust[citation needed]. They might give gifts or money to the child for no apparent reason (toys, dolls, etc.). They may show pornographyvideos or picturesto the child, hoping to make it easy for the child to accept such acts, thus normalizing the behavior. They may simply talk about sexual topics. These are just some of the methods a child groomer might use to gain a child's trust and affection to allow them to do what they want. Hugging and kissing or other physical contact, even when the child does not want it, can happen. To the groomer, this is a way to get close.[dubious discuss] Or rather could reflect their depraved intentions toward the child. They might talk about problems normally discussed between adults, or at least people of the same age. Topics might include marital problems and other conflicts. They may try to gain the childs parents trust by befriending them, with the goal of easy access to the child. The child groomer might look for opportunities to have time alone with the child. This can be done by offering to babysit. The groomer may invite the child for sleepovers. This gives them the opportunity to sleep in the same room or even the same bed with the child.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_grooming
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/011805pltreqaseemd.pdf
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)for the most replies to one of my comments (21 replies). Some folks don't like it when you say that they're basically holding a grudge against Vick even after he spent time behind bars, but that's the truth. They continue to harbor ill-will towards someone who has already been punished for his misdeeds. And constantly hating him will not bring all of those dead dogs back to life.
will bring those dogs back to life. That is the point.
Dorian Gray
(13,479 posts)but I dislike people out there for far less.
Julia Roberts gets on my last nerve and all she ever did was jump on Denzel's back.
And Paris Hilton? I can't even look at the woman without vomiting.
So, yeah, I judge people for their past actions. And someone who most like abused a bunch of kids and someone who killed a bunch of animals I'm going to dislike.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Not exactly sure why you are upset that people think they are both scum.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)over four years. He was a talented but troubled man. It serves no purpose to judge him now.
As for Vick, the courts dealt with him. He was released and allowed to get on with his life.
Kind of related--an old classmate of mine served a long sentence for a crime committed back in the late 1970's. You may have heard of him. He is Chris Boyce, the "falcon" of "The Falcon and the Snowman" fame. Back when he was in his early 20's he was given a top secret job as a clerk at defense contractor TRW. He was outraged when he found out that the CIA was interfering in Australia's internal affairs, and he and a buddy struck back by conspiring to sell classified documents to Russia. Thy were young and stupid. They were caught and both served lengthy sentences, much of it in solitary. Chris was paroled in 2003 and now lives a quiet life. He and his wife co-wrote a book recently about his experiences, a book which I mentioned on a Facebook post. The hatred that poured forth from former classmates was astounding. The courts set him free, but he remains a prisoner of people's hatred and inability to let go. More than one person said they 'd execute him if given the chance. I'd prefer to respect the judgement of the courts and let both Chris and Michael Vick get on with their lives.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)just let go of the fact that some people won't let some things go.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)As for Michael Vick...yes he served his time. Then he got out of prison and was given the opportunity to make millions again. He is not still being punished. He's an NFL quarterback. In every meaningful way, he has been given another chance. That doesn't automatically entitle him to anyone's respect, though.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)It includes a naked picture of the boy who accused him. It's plain to see why MJ paid over 20 million dollars to this boy. This evidence, plus the boy's description of his genitals would have landed him in prison
http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/011805pltreqaseemd.pdf
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)doesn't mean he was sexually attracted to them!
Michael loved children!
He loved them so much that he used to sleep with them, even after being accused of child molestation!
It was innocent!
Sharing photos of nude children with boys he slept with was innocent!
Showing his dick to boys he slept with was innocent!
What is wrong with you, tarnishing the reputation of a grown-ass man child? With a house full of kiddie porn?
All those little naked children in that one picture he had commissioned of himself are crying now because of you!
You should be ashamed!
zappaman
(20,606 posts)What grown man DOESN'T have naked pics of kids in his home?
What grown man DOESN'T like to sleep with little boys in the same bed?
Maybe we should not be so judge mental of this wonderful little boy who never grew up?
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)It's so easy to find these days.
Half the books I get at Barnes and Noble nowadays turn out to be kiddie porn. My mailbox is stuffed with kiddie porn. I go on my favorite websites and there's kiddie porn in the sidebar.
Seems like you can't leave the house without seeing a picture of a naked kid.
Child porn is a fact of life, and as long as it doesn't affect my close relationship with all the boys in the neighborhood, I don't really see a problem with it.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)I had not formed an opinion other than he might be a scapegoat, until reading that list of materials he had.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and Robert Byrd for being an Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan, than they are to forgive Michael Vick.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)Yeah, dog fighting is an ugly thing. Still I'm not one of these folks who think dogs or other animals are better than people.
Byrd repented. He turned his back on the Klan and sided with civil rights. Besides, one does not need to like the guy to appreciate whatever his public accomplishments are.
I don't know what happened at Chappaquiddick, but it was probably not murder (intent to kill). More likely, it was an involuntary manslaughter caused by the misdemeanor of DUI. Unfortunately, Ted's rich, white privilege shielded him from any legal consequences the same way it protected Dick Cheney after he shot a guy. Still, Ted Kennedy's public role was as a warrior against poverty and injustice.
catbyte
(34,333 posts)service to others afterwards. What has Vick done to show he truly regrets his torturing & killing animals for fun & profit? The only thing he is sorry about is that he got caught. You really don't see a difference?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Humane Society President and CEO Wayne Pacelle said he was approached with the idea of working with the former star quarterback several months ago by Vick's representatives. After meeting with Vick at the federal prison camp, Pacelle said, he decided just within the past week that working with Vick was the right move for the society and its missions. Specifics are to be determined, but Pacelle made it clear that the expectation on both sides is for Vick to contribute more to the cause than public service announcements. A source close to Vick said he has agreed to be more than a spokesman. Pacelle believes Vick can do the most good in the area the society believes is of greatest need -- urban outreach and prevention.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2009/05/michael-vick-to-work-with-humane-society.html#sthash.IYXnnFXe.dpuf
catbyte
(34,333 posts)MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)They get no forgiveness from me.
malaise
(268,693 posts)Some people are incapable of forgiving others.
840high
(17,196 posts)not to forgive Vick. The pictures of those poor dogs will remain with me.
flvegan
(64,406 posts)Animal lover, my ass.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)Would a person forgive them if it was their dog tortured.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)catbyte
(34,333 posts)that was not only illegal, but morally repugnant and on a par with horrific child abuse. He never really expressed any real remorse. I don't go out of my way to hate him, but as far as I'm concerned, he was, is, and always will be a colossal POS. He didn't spend nearly enough time in prison. Did you see his dogs?
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)I don't have to let anything go.
And the disgusting thing about Michael Vick, after he served his time, he had a job waiting for him in the NFL again. He's back to playing and earning his millions.
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)After scumbags like Michael Vick get done with them, living creatures sometimes remain. Sometimes. The nightmares that animals rescuers go through dealing with the remnants of dog-fighting are horrific, and that's not even considering what the animals themselves went through.
Then there's the human victims of child abuse, which I thankfully know nothing about.
People feel passionately about this, so expecting folks to "let it go" isn't logical. It's human nature to despise Vick and Jackson. Michael Vick is a disgusting excuse for a human, because he preyed on our animal friends who grew up alongside us as human beings and who've always looked to humans for companionship. Dogs aren't human, but nor are they chickens or cows. Dogs have always been something different. Even though Vick was charged and jailed, preying on dogs does something to the human psyche in most normal people, I think.
Michael Jackson was never convicted, so I'll let that go.
pecwae
(8,021 posts)MJ - for me, not enough tangible evidence to prove the man was a pedophile. Liked some of his music, thought he was weird, that's the extent of my opinion of him.
Vick - irrefutable proof the man abused animals for fun and profit. He's pond scum.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)I think you identify a little too closely with Vick, because of your father and other male relatives, as you have indicated. The fact that you have forgiven them for their evil deeds gives you no right to expect others to forgive as well.
Tim4319
(3,077 posts)In my opinion, Michael Jackson never had a childhood! He was performing continuously from a very early age. He was never afforded a normal life of a child growing up. I also believe the reasons why he gravitated to towards children so much, had to do with children did not want to use him for what he has. So, as he grew older, he found himself trusting children more than he could trust adults. So, he turned his home into an amusement park, had sleep overs, and surrounded himself with children so he could have a childhood.
Now, whether or not he molested children, I do not know! He was found innocent in the court of law, and from what I understand, a person is innocent until proven guilty.
As far as Mike Vick goes, as a kid growing up in Newport News, VA, he would watch dog fights when the police would arrive and do nothing. They would just leave and let the dog fighting continue. So, from a very young age dog fighting probably did not seem to be big of a deal as what it actually was. Plus, Mike Vick did not invent dog fighting. Dog fighting has been going on long before Mike Vick got caught, and it continues to go on to this day. There have been tons of dog fighting rings that were exposed and the worst some of those caught received was couple of thousand dollars in fines.
So, please don't get me wrong, I do believe dog fighting is a horrible act! But, I never hear anyone talk about what he has done with his life as far as animal rights since he has been released? It appears that that people love to have the "crabs in a barrel" mentality, when they refuse to allow someone who has done wrong in his/her past, but after having been rehabilitated, allowing them to prove to society that they truly regret their missteps and they have changed. It would be nice to judge Mike Vick for what he has done since being released from prison. I thought that is what prison is about, rehabilitation and reform!
I'm sure I'm gonna get flamed for my opinions, but again, these are my opinions.
StarrGazerr
(60 posts)The difference is that Michael Vick was punished for his crime, publicly apologized, and has worked to help animals ever since, while MJ bought off his victims and never even acknowledged his crimes, much less apologized for them. Not to mention that Michael Vick preyed on animals, while MJ preyed on human beings. I love animals, and agree that harming them is a criminal act, but it does not compare to victimizing innocent children in any way, shape or form. To say "well he was a talented musician" doesn't give him a pass on morality and legality. They always say "Well, Mussolini got the trains to run on time", but that doesn't excuse the fact that he was a Fascist dictator responsible for the deaths of millions.
OwnedByCats
(805 posts)Nobody will ever know, unless some video footage comes out, which is highly unlikely. He absolutely should have set some boundaries, it however doesn't make him a child molester. I don't know how anyone can know with complete conviction that he was. I have a lot of trouble doing that when I wasn't there.
Michael Vick, well seeing as how I don't think there is any question of his involvement, I have my reasons as to why I don't let go my bitterness over the whole thing. To make clear, I don't wish death or horrible disease on him but I haven't forgiven him because I don't forgive animal abuse. It's not a race thing, I don't care who does it. Makes no difference to me one iota. Not that it matters anyway. He doesn't need my forgiveness.
Here's the thing. Animal abuse hits me at my very core, in a devastating way. I have issues with animal abusers. It happens all around and I can't get away from it. I can't shut myself off from the world. I also can't help animals without knowing the abuse happens. I feel horrible about what the animals went through, how they were afraid, how they suffered, how they died. If I feel horrible for them, then it makes me miserable with a sadness I can't explain. It's how I'm wired. Some of it stems back to something that happened when I was 16. I always loved animals, always hated abuse of them. However, once I actually witnessed at only 16 years old an act of cruelty performed right in front of me and I couldn't stop it and save that animal, it traumatized me. It increased my hatred for it a million fold. I never wanted to kill a person ever in my life until that day. It's scary to actually feel, with no rationality at all, like you want to kill someone in a rage. If I had not been held back by several other people, I would have fought tooth and nail to do it in that moment. I probably wouldn't have succeeded as I had no real lethal weapon at hand, but it doesn't change the fact that it was scary to actually want to do it. Then I have to live through the guilt of not being able to stop it for the rest of my life no matter that I was powerless to do so. I still think if I had predicted what this person was setting out to do, I could have prevented it. Yes, I know - how was I to know? It doesn't stop the guilt for me though.
Michael Vick is just one of thousands who commit abuse to animals but we talk about him specifically because he's a well known celebrity. All abusers are scum. His conduct since leaving prison rubs me the wrong way too. It's not the talks at schools to tell kids not to get involved in dog fighting, it's not what he's done with the Humane Society, it's the fact that he has never reached out to those who helped his dogs. Never offered money to those who used their own to help his dogs, has not even asked how they are. Then he started complaining that he couldn't have pets in his home and his kids are missing out. Firstly, he should have thought about that before doing what he did. Secondly, that ban was temporary. All he had to do was wait 3 years for the ban to expire. Other people have been banned for life on much less forms of abuse, as they should. Then when it expired, he got two dogs, which made my stomach turn at the thought. Then we have the photo ops at Petsmart, him going for dog training. Was that really necessary? Why not hire a private dog trainer at his home, no pictures leaked to the press? Why did this need to come out? Well, I think we all know the reason for that.
I did not think he should serve a life sentence, but I did not feel he should have been allowed back in the NFL. How many other people can leave prison and land a job paying millions, or be able to slide back into their old one? Parolees struggle to live the straight life, but end up back in the system because they can't get anywhere, particularly if they are black. He seems to have landed perfectly on his feet after everything while others leaving prison on far less heinous crimes can't get anywhere.
It's mainly my issues that makes it impossible for me to forgive. If others want to forgive him, that's fine. I won't be mad about that. But others have got to understand - while they may be better people than me, I just can't do it.