Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Unemployment
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:05 PM
Dec 2013

I don't understand this. I thought unemployment was for 99 weeks. Why suddenly are they cutting it? I think they should keep it 99 weeks until we are down to around 5 percent unemployment.

 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
2. State unemployment benefits run for 26 weeks. Normal federal unemployment runs an added 13 weeks
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:14 PM
Dec 2013

The normal total is 39 weeks combined. Federal unemployment benefits have been extended past 13 weeks during periods of high unemployment, but those are temporary and need to be reauthorized. Unemployment has been coming down - that is the likely reason why the extended federal benefits are being cut back or not reauthorized.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
3. They are cutting it because they hold as an article of faith that NO GOOD for the PEOPLE can be all
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:15 PM
Dec 2013

to come from the government.

To allow the people to have any benefit from the government
puts the lie to St. RayGun's statement
"The Government can not solve any problem, the government is the problem".

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
4. Yeah the puke civilians I know are calling it a 99 week vacation. They state how it demotivates
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:27 PM
Dec 2013

and are comparing it to feeding wildlife and the wildlife becoming dependent upon the hand out.

They make me want to fucking scream.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
5. I saw someone on Twitter parrot the RW talking point that UI leads to "dependence"
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:27 PM
Dec 2013

Seemed to imply that long-term unemployed were lazy and not looking for work.

Some people have given up. If the numbers actually counted those people, the rate would be much higher. No, they've given up but are not on UI, probably and subsisting by some other means.

The right wing talking point seems to be that taking unemployment means people quit looking and decide, what, to just live high off the hog on their $200 a week? It makes no sense and is a disgusting attitude no matter how you look at it. Rightwingers are cold, unfeeling assholes. I'm convinced they're all sociopaths incapable of empathy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unemployed Workers Need B...