General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUPDATE - Racketeering Romney Litigation - (? VEGAS odds on MittTwit answering Complaint?).
Down below is a look upon the docket of the federal court styled layout concerning the October 18, 2013 Racketeering lawsuit yours truly filed against Mitt Romney and his RICO Gang of unjust enrichment profiteers. We are now in day 55 of the lawsuit progressing forward (Specifically - no corruption rearing its ugly head and shutting the case down). A couple of decent introspects into the case can be found at PoliticusUSA.com articles by Rmuse (here) (here) & (here), DailyKos (here) & (here) and the ObamaCrat (here).
To tell you the truth, I find it a miracle that we've gotten this far. So much so, it boggles my mind that the Delaware bad faith adjudication upon the merits is not storming the castle. Each and every day I go to the docket through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system ("PACER" ; so doing to verify to myself - that undue influence has not taken over. My veins tighten, my heart speeds up and I get tense - each/every single time I go to the Los Angeles District Court website and look up case 2:13-cv-7738.
And yet, by miracle of miracles - here we are in day 55 of the "Haas v Romney" case; which IS going forward.
Here's the thing. I've got MittTwit and his gang of nefarious men/attorneys by the proverbial's. The evidence is profuse, overwhelming and irrefutable. Most of the proofs of the Racketeering is found in the court docket record. The reason the evidence trail is something a 1st failing law student could successfully prosecute them all - is because of hubris. Romney, Traub and MNAT simply did NOT give a damn how much lying, thieving and corruption they did openly. They stalwarts arduously believed that their "boss" was going to be THE BOSS of America (POTUS).
But - Mitt Didn't Make It!
Delaware Valley federal courts and agencies (U.S. Trustee & U.S. Attorney) - have rogue elements within who are also guilty of being duplicitous in the racketeering. Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to name the agencies as defendants; but I have named the former United States Attorney Colm F Connolly.
Next week I'm going to file a motion (and pay careful attention to this now) that is asking the court to stipulate (under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 201 "Judicial Notice" - and make a ruling on the fact that Mitt Romney & his co-Defendants are NOT above the Law. Obviously, that is an extraordinary request. After all, judges swear an oath to administrate the law equally to rich & poor alike. But I'm asking a legitimate question. Are parties like Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and Mitt Romney above the Law?
Prior to this good faith justice (His Honor Stephen V. Wilson) taking on the "Haas v Romney" Racketeering case and permitting it to go through proper procedure; everyone else (heretofore) has treated Mitt & his gang as "IF" they ARE above the law.
And that ain't right.
So, now that the case is proceeding along (thus far) in proper form - the next step is that the parties are to be served a Summons and have to answer within 21 days.
However - I've made a request that the judge (due to mayhem & homicides) order the U.S. Marshals to serve the Summonses.
But, I'm going to amend that request, now that I've studied the Federal Rule of Civil Procedures (specifically Rule 4); which states that you can request a party "waive" service. When such is done (by mail) in a federal lawsuit, the defendants canNOT be unreasonable. When that process goes its course, Romney & his gang will have 30 days (instead of 21) - to respond.
Which brings U.S. to the point - what would be the Las Vegas ODDs on such occurring?
There are many an attorney trying to help the bandits who bragged & sneered that the case would be tossed out by the Clerk of Court. When that didn't happen, the trolls and such said that the judge would FINE me (specifically under Fed.R.Civ.P 11) - for daring to bring the case into court. But none of those brown-nosers are looking at that little thing called evidence. We already have confessions to 34 acts of lying under oath to a chief federal justice. To win this case, I only need 2 acts (technically). Though, I'll grant this - that the court is going to require more than a mere two.
And I've got plenty proofs more!
So, being that Capone's ghost incarnate (Romney) has been caught with his pants down; how is that "magic" underwear of his going to get him out of this jam? He doesn't have his billion dollar advertising budget (though - technically - he still owns Clear Channel/Rush Lame-baugh)! So how will the case go? If Romney answers the Summons/ Complaint - the main stream media will have NO choice. They will have to pick up the story.
Again - what are the VEGAS odds that Mitt will answer the complaint?
Will Romney and his gang all get together and ask the court to have me shot? They simply can NOT answer the complaint. If they were honest (I think it is actually against the Law for Pitten's to not engage in flip flopping banter) - then the answer would be something like this;
"Surely the court understands that Romney was retroactively retired from Bain Capital as CEO"?
Besides, Corporations are people - and they deserve a "get out of jail free card" - too!
---
Will maniacal Mitt answer - Or will the powers that be - come into play?
[br][hr][hr][br]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:13-cv-07738-SVW-AGR
Steven Laser Haas v. Willard Mitt Romney et al
Assigned to: Judge Stephen V. Wilson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
[br]
Date Filed: 10/18/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
[hr]
Plaintiff
Steven Laser Haas
-----------------
Delmar, DE 19940
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Willard Mitt Romney
Defendant
Paul Traub
Defendant
Bain Capital
Defendant
John and Jane Does
1 thru 10
Defendant
Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel ("MNAT"
Defendant
Greg Werkheiser
Defendant
Barry Gold
Defendant
Michael Glazer
Defendant
Colm F Connolly
Defendant
Goldman Sachs
Defendant
Johann Hamerski
Date Filed # Docket Text
10/18/2013 2 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint - 1 as to defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser. (esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)
10/18/2013 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by plaintiff Steven Laser Haas, identifying Other Affiliate eToys, Other Affiliate Shareholders of eToys, Other Affiliate Wells Fargo-FootHill Capital, Other Affiliate Collateral Logistics, Inc, Other Affiliate Playco-Toys International, Other Affiliate Kay Bee Toys for Steven Laser Haas. (esa) (Entered: 10/24/2013)
10/24/2013 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg is participating in a pilot project regarding the submission of SEALED DOCUMENTS. Effective July 8, 2013, all proposed sealed documents pertaining to discovery matters referred to the magistrate judge must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address at AGR_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. Please refer to the judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/24/2013)
11/06/2013 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Bain Capital, Colm F Connolly, Michael Glazer, Barry Gold, Goldman Sachs, John and Jane Does, Morris Nichols Arsht and Tunnel, Willard Mitt Romney, Paul Traub, Greg Werkheiser, Johann Hamerski amending Complaint - (Discovery), 1 , filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3)(pj) (Entered: 11/07/2013)
12/02/2013 8 RACKETEERING CIVIL PRELIMINARY RICO CASE STATEMENT 1st Edition Part A filed by Plaintiff Steven Laser Haas (pj) (Entered: 12/10/2013)
[br]
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)There is presently no procedural reason to answer the complaint.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)(a felony) and gets probation. it hasnt happened yet b/c there's still lots of time. im crossing my fingers for you, davey, but goliath will probably not walk into this. remember stalling court cases till one side runs out of money is common. good luck to u
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)I do understand your analogy.
They simply can not answer;
so something has to give......
Appreciate your well wishing.