Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPart of Utah's bigamy law struck down in victory for U.S. TV star
Source: Reuters
Part of Utah's bigamy law struck down in victory for U.S. TV star
BY JENNIFER DOBNER
SALT LAKE CITY Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:43am EST
(Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge struck down a portion of Utah's bigamy laws as unconstitutional on Friday, siding with a reality television star and his four wives.
Polygamy is illegal in all 50 states. But Utah's law is unique in that a person can be found guilty not just for having two legal marriage licenses, but also for cohabiting with another adult in a marriage-like relationship when they are already legally married to someone else.
U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups ruled that the second aspect is too broad because it bars consenting adults from living together and criminalizes their intimate sexual relationships.
He said the law violates both the First Amendment's clause ensuring religious rights and the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause designed to ensure liberty.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
BY JENNIFER DOBNER
SALT LAKE CITY Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:43am EST
(Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge struck down a portion of Utah's bigamy laws as unconstitutional on Friday, siding with a reality television star and his four wives.
Polygamy is illegal in all 50 states. But Utah's law is unique in that a person can be found guilty not just for having two legal marriage licenses, but also for cohabiting with another adult in a marriage-like relationship when they are already legally married to someone else.
U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups ruled that the second aspect is too broad because it bars consenting adults from living together and criminalizes their intimate sexual relationships.
He said the law violates both the First Amendment's clause ensuring religious rights and the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause designed to ensure liberty.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/14/us-usa-polygamy-sisterwives-idUSBRE9BD02720131214
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 975 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Part of Utah's bigamy law struck down in victory for U.S. TV star (Original Post)
Eugene
Dec 2013
OP
No, I think the rightwing reaction to this will be more like "this will lead to sharia law!"
Spider Jerusalem
Dec 2013
#2
valerief
(53,235 posts)1. This polygamy will lead to man on dog love. I just know it. nt
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)2. No, I think the rightwing reaction to this will be more like "this will lead to sharia law!"
RC
(25,592 posts)3. We still have parts of the Constitution that are still in force?
I was wondering about that. However I thought the Due Process part was one of the parts reserved for the rich and well to do.
Well, never mind, I answered my own question.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)4. Good!
What the hell business is it of the state's what type of relationship(s) a person has?
Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)5. Good ruling. Consenting adults should be able to marry whoever they wish. nt
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)6. I think Kody of "Sister Wives" should be in jail.
And his four wives need psychiatric help.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)7. Good decision. The state can't tell you who you can live with.