Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 02:53 PM Dec 2013

NYPost Backs Michael Moore's Bush-Saudi Claims from Fahrenheit 911: "Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup"

Last edited Mon Dec 16, 2013, 06:09 PM - Edit history (1)



Shock: today’s Murdoch owned highly conservative New York Post features an opinion piece backing Michael Moore’s Bush-Saudi claims from “Fahrenheit 911.” It’s the main story on the Post’s website with a huge photo and prominent placement. The story is also featured in a color block headline on the front page of today’s paper.

Moore must get a lot of satisfaction out of this. It’s only taken a decade for a conservative pundit writing in a conservative newspaper to endorse his movie.

Indeed, Paul Sperry’s editorial is a direct echo of a 2003 Vanity Fair story by Craig Unger, author of the book that was the underlying information for the Oscar winning movie. That book was called “House of Bush, House of Saud” and it still available for Kindle. The Vanity Fair article was called Saving the Saudis, publishing ten years ago. Here’s the link: http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2003/10/saving-the-saudis-200310

Today’s piece by Sperry is shocking first because he is a conservative. But second, Sperry’s piece questions why huge portions of a Congressional report about 9/11 remain redacted– blacked out–in his piece called “Inside the Saudi Cover Up.”

Inside the Saudi 9/11 coverup
http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/


Michael Moore's Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/mmflint




http://www.showbiz411.com/2013/12/15/murdochs-nypost-today-backs-michael-moore-bush-saudi-claims-from-fahrenheit-911
UPDATE- Paul Sperry responds: “Unger and Moore have their own agendas. mine aligns with the FBI WFO case agents and FCPD* detectives who say they’ll never forgive the Bush admin for throttling their investigation of leads back to Saudi Embassy and Bandar himself in McLean. they view the former POTUS as a traitor.”
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
1. When the Official "Bush/PNAC Glee Club" accepts the basic tenant of 9/11 LIHOP....
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:02 PM
Dec 2013

...it might be time to apologize to all the "DU Truthers" sent to the Dungeon over the past 12 years.

 

Penicilino

(97 posts)
2. Why do some people refer to specific columnists by the name of their newspapers?
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:38 PM
Dec 2013

If Eugene Robinson and George Will say something good and bad about Obama, in that order? what title should I use in an internet post?

"Washington Post' praises and slams President Obama?

I would probably stick with mentioning the specific columnist (in this case, Paul Sperry of the New York Post) instead of pretending his parents named him "NY Post".

It is very likely that many New York Post columnists disagree with Moore's view.

So implying that the NY Post and Michael Moore share the same views on 9-11 is highly misleading.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
9. When a paper with a dedicated agenda such as the NY Post publishes something,
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 05:41 PM
Dec 2013

it is serving as a filter. The medium is at least as important as the messenger in such a case.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
6. once it's too late they can admit it--when would we have learned about Iran-Contra
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:15 PM
Dec 2013

had Hasenfus not been shot down? they confess, and then their flacks say "see! it's impossible to keep up a coverup! all the plots being revealed means there's no more plots to be revealed! YOU WOO-SLINGING RACISTS"

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
7. To my memory,
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:46 PM
Dec 2013

...Michael Moore is the only private American citizen to be attacked by a sitting President from the podium during a State of the Union Address.

THAT is how much they fear Micheal Moore.


This is a difficult claim to Fact Check without reading every State of the Union Address every delivered,
so I added the disclaimer above "To My Memory".

I remember how pathetic it was for a President to attack a private citizen during a SOTU.

bucolic_frolic

(43,128 posts)
10. Lady Gaga is so hot
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:07 PM
Dec 2013

The Post is just blowing with the political winds to sell newspapers

From olive oil to whale blubber to coal to petroleum to wind and solar

There is an economic and financial elite making money from energy

because the whole world runs on it

Saddam had a lot of oil and gold and money

He doesn't have it anymore

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
14. Hmm, reading in "Dirty Wars", by Jeremy Scahill, sheds a differing light on Anwar al-Awlaki ...>
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:31 PM
Dec 2013

No doubt was murdered by a U.S. drone attack in Yemen. Although he was an American citizen, never got due process .. I am still scratching my head as to what role he really did play in assisting the hijackers. Scahill purports that Awlaki's involvement with these hijackers was coincidental if not circumstantial.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYPost Backs Michael Moor...