Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lostincalifornia

(3,639 posts)
1. you can go to coverca.com, and use the shop and compare tool. https://www.coveredca.com
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:12 PM
Dec 2013

Yes, it is California, not Texas, but whether you qualify for the subsidy is the same in all states. Also Kaiser has a similar tool

http://kff.org/interactive/subsidy-calculator/

In general, the Modified Adjusted Income rules are as follows:

To get a subsidy, the couple's modified adjusted gross income for 2014 income would need to fall below $62,040, which is 400 percent of poverty for a family of two. (For a single person, the cutoff is $45,960. For other size households, see www.tinyurl.com/pwugnus.)

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
2. Basically if you are making between 100% and 400% of poverty-level income, you qualify.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:12 PM
Dec 2013

For individuals this is around $11500 to $46000.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
3. I have a question about those percentages.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:20 PM
Dec 2013

Everyone keeps going on about 400% - but if you go to the Kaiser subsidy calculator and enter information for an individual:

US average
Age: 33 (this is the median age in the US, I believe)
single, no dependents, non-smoker
not covered by employer plan

Then the income you can enter that is eligible for a subsidy is not "around" $46000 - it's $32214 (exactly - which gives you a $1 subsidy).

Where does the 400% come into it?

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
4. Really? Everything I've read says 400%.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:22 PM
Dec 2013

I wonder if geography has anything to do with it? Have you tried different zip codes?

I thought it was tied to the Federal poverty level though, so this is news to me.

enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
5. Okay - I didn't enter 33 as the age.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 03:41 PM
Dec 2013

I thought I did. I entered 30.
If you enter 33 (with all other variables the same), you get a $160 annual subsidy - so the difference is age.

A 32 year old would get a $122 subsidy for the year.

However, if the income of the 32 year old went up to $33000 they would not receive a subsidy.

Hell. I don't know.


edited: location doesn't make a difference, as far as I can tell

Sienna86

(2,148 posts)
7. Another question on the subsidy
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 04:08 PM
Dec 2013

As I understand, if my employer offers insurance to me, a retired employee, I cannot take advantage of other plans offered under ACA or the subsidy. Is that correct?

rucky

(35,211 posts)
9. You can sign up for an ACA plan, but you won't qualify for a subsidy.
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:53 PM
Dec 2013

Your employer's plan will probably beat it out, but it's worth checking things out for comparison.

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
8. I thought I would get a subsidy
Sun Dec 15, 2013, 06:50 PM
Dec 2013

I'm single, make $45K a year. But no, I don't qualify. Maybe age or location changes it? Don't know...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Confused on health-care s...