General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYour Assumptions About Welfare Recipients Are Wrong
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/12/18/3081791/welfare-recipient-spending/The stereotype of the low-income people enrolled in government programs is that they spend the money on frivolities and are unwise with their budgets. But the data proves otherwise. Families who receive public benefits such as housing assistance, welfare cash assistance, food stamps, Medicaid, and Social Security Income (SSI) for the disabled or low-income elderly have much smaller spending budgets than those who dont receive benefits and spend a bigger portion on the basics such as food, housing, and transportation, according to an analysis by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
On average, families who are enrolled in these public programs spend less than half of what families who arent enrolled spend. They also put a bigger percentage of that money toward food, housing, and transportation, devoting 77 percent of their budgets to these necessities compared to about 65 percent for other families. Meanwhile, they spend less, on average, on some things thought to be luxuries like eating out and entertainment. A family that doesnt get public benefits spends 4.5 percent of its budget on food away from home, while a two-parent family who gets benefits spends 4 percent of its budget on eating out and a single parent spends 3.6 percent. Food away from home spending was higher in both dollar amount and percent of total spending among families not receiving assistance, the report notes. Families who dont need assistance also spend more on entertainment in both dollar and percentage terms and devote more of their budgets to other expenses.
Families who receive benefits are also more likely to go without higher priced items like houses and cars. Just 3 percent of families who dont get benefits went without a car, compared to nearly a quarter of those on the rolls. On average, a family that isnt enrolled in public programs has about two cars, while a family that is enrolled has about one. Meanwhile, more than three-quarters of families not receiving assistance are homeowners, while the opposite is true for families who do need the support: just about three-quarters are renters instead of homeowners.
And while the stereotype of the welfare queen is a woman who has more children to increase the benefits she gets from government programs, families who are enrolled look similar to those who arent. Average family size was the same (3.7 persons), whether or not a family received assistance, the report notes.
..................... more
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/12/18/3081791/welfare-recipient-spending/
Warpy
(111,237 posts)is that anyone with the capacity to get off public assistance does so as quickly as possible because the quality of life on assistance is so incredibly poor.
People who are on welfare generation to generation need to be looked at a little more closely instead of being blamed for a "culture of dependence." No one would voluntarily choose a life of penury and bureaucratic humiliation. Something else has to be going on, like borderline mental retardation or familial depression.
It's obscene that wages were pushed down so low that so many people rely on government assistance to feed themselves even with full time work. When work fails to support the worker, it's time for a revolution.
Let's hope we're allowed another peaceful revolution.
Iggo
(47,547 posts)bobclark86
(1,415 posts)the larger a percentage basic necessities -- generally a pretty set cost for everyone -- take up.
That would be the "duh" moment of the day, in my book.
But it's easier to hate people (poor people, black people, gay people, conservative people) than try to fix a problem.