Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,492 posts)
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 12:04 AM Dec 2013

"White House to get aggressive on climate change?"

White House to get aggressive on climate change?

By Greg Sargent at the Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/12/18/white-house-to-get-aggressive-on-climate-change/


"SNIP...............................


Republicans are rightly outraged this morning because new White House counsel0r John Podesta compared the GOP to a “cult worthy of Jonestown” in an interview earlier this fall that Politico published today. Podesta has since apologized.

Beyond this flap, there is some important news in the piece about Podesta: He agreed to the job on the condition that he be allowed to oversee an aggressive climate change agenda via executive action.

As Politico’s Glenn Thrush reports:


The deal-sealer for Podesta, who has vowed to stay for only a year, was Obama’s assurance that he would be given broad oversight of the administration’s climate change agenda — even though Podesta has agreed to recuse himself from the decision on the Keystone pipeline, which he opposes. And here is where the template for Podesta in action might first become apparent: With chances of major legislation on climate change all but dead given congressional opposition, Podesta will push for aggressive executive action, in addition to backstopping new Environmental Protection Agency chief Gina McCarthy on controversial new emissions guidelines for power plants.

Moreover, he is almost certain to side with environmentalists over energy companies, as he did during the Clinton administration when he teamed with Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt to protect vast new tracts of national forest and wetlands from gas and oil exploration.





...............................SNIP"
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"White House to get aggressive on climate change?" (Original Post) applegrove Dec 2013 OP
Link? hedda_foil Dec 2013 #1
Thanks. Done applegrove Dec 2013 #2
I just finished watching Promised Land.... ohheckyeah Dec 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Dec 2013 #4
Aggressive on climate change=MORE CLIMATE CHANGE!!! EAT WHIRLED PEAS, MOTHERFUCKERS! TheKentuckian Dec 2013 #5

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
3. I just finished watching Promised Land....
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 01:00 AM
Dec 2013

God, it's depressing. Corporations won't be happy until they've screwed up the entire country and eventually the world. If someone doesn't do something really soon, it will be too late. It probably already is. It's way past time for someone to get aggressive about climate change.

Response to applegrove (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"White House to get ...