Nebraska model gets jail time for impious nude photo stunt at Catholic high school
I'm not a lawyer but doesn't someone have to witness a public nudity incident for the complaint to be valid? Either which way the sentence seems excessive.
An adult model was sentenced to jail time for sneaking onto the campus of her former Catholic high school to take raunchy photos, which included the highly unorthodox use of a crucifix on herself.
Valerie Dodds was found guilty in a bench trial last month of trespassing and public nudity for the May 13 stunt at her former high school, and Judge Thomas Fox sentenced her Friday to 45 days in jail.
Dodds filed notice of an appeal and was released later the same day on $75 bond.
The 19-year-old Dodds performs under the name Val Midwest, and she said she posed for the photos and posted them online as revenge against former classmates and teachers at Lincoln Pius X High School who criticized her for her post-graduation career choices.
“Everyone at my high school had something rude to say to me when I started my website and so this is my tribute to all of you lol,” Dodds wrote on her website. “I held nothing back I used my fingers, my toys and even my crucifix in my p*ssy! I used every part of the school I could get into, payback is a b*tch ha ha.”
Her attorney, Chad Wythers, didn’t ask for a specific sentence, but he argued that first-time drunken driving offenders cause more risk to others “than parading around naked,” and most initial DUI convictions result in no more than a week in jail.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/23/nebraska-model-gets-jail-time-for-impious-nude-photo-stunt-at-catholic-high-school/
= new reply since forum marked as read
